9 research outputs found
Paradoks Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kriminologi di Indonesia
Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia on the Criminology perspective in Indonesia actually happened because it is contrast and opposed one another among the legal upholders in upholding and not understanding enough the legislation and legal theories comprehensively, because the legislation and legal theories essentially as a analysis knife in upholding the criminal law in Indonesia. Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia generally because of being less the legal apparatus’ knowledge themselves in understanding the legislation and legal theories so in enforcing the criminal law often produced some mistakes, whereas the legal theories are the legal resource to solve the events that are being happened in legal process and in the society noussays. Causes factors that happened and invited the paradox of criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective in Indonesia are the legal factor itself, the law enforcement factor, means factor, community factor and cultural factor. The effort of paradox criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective could be done by having improvement of system, the moralistic improvement and the ethics of legal upholders, improvement of legal education and the realization of religion.  
Paradoks Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Kriminologi di Indonesia
Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia on the Criminology perspective in Indonesia actually happened because it is contrast and opposed one another among the legal upholders in upholding and not understanding enough the legislation and legal theories comprehensively, because the legislation and legal theories essentially as a analysis knife in upholding the criminal law in Indonesia. Paradox of criminal law enforcement in Indonesia generally because of being less the legal apparatus' knowledge themselves in understanding the legislation and legal theories so in enforcing the criminal law often produced some mistakes, whereas the legal theories are the legal resource to solve the events that are being happened in legal process and in the society noussays. Causes factors that happened and invited the paradox of criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective in Indonesia are the legal factor itself, the law enforcement factor, means factor, community factor and cultural factor. The effort of paradox criminal law enforcement on the criminology perspective could be done by having improvement of system, the moralistic improvement and the ethics of legal upholders, improvement of legal education and the realization of religion
Kombinasi Limbah Kelapa Sawit Danampas Tahu Sebagai Media Budidaya Maggot (Hermetia Illucens) Salah Satu Alternatip Pakan Ikan
This experiment aims to determine the effect of the combination of palm oil waste residue / Palm Kernel Meal (PKM) and pulp out as a growth medium for the cultivation and production of maggot (Hermetia illucens) which can be used as an alternative to fish feed. Media culture is a combination of material experiments 4 kg PKM (100%) and pulp out (0%) treatment A, 3 kg PKM (75%) and 1 kg pulp out (25%) treatment B, 2 kg PKM (50%) and 2 kg of pulp out (50%) treatment C, and 1 kg of PKM (25%) and 3 kg of pulp out (75%) treated D. All of these treatments using a container closed the outdoors. Each container treatment added as much as 5.2 liters of fresh water, then stirred evenly. Data were analyzed by ANOVA and LSD test.The results of the analysis of the experiment 21 days for growth are not significantly different (P <0.05). The average value of the best treatment in A (weight 0.18 ± 0.68 g/individul and length 17.26 ± 1.06 mm), followed by treatment B. (weight 0.17 ± 0.68 g/individual and length of 17.07 ± 1.06 mm), C (weight 0.17 ± 0.68 g/individual and 17.04 ± 1.06 mm of length) and the lowest in the D (0.16 ± 0.68 g/individual and 16.98 ± 1.06 mm). While the yield significantly different (P <0.05), the best biomass production of 1.66 ± 0.1/kg for A, in the lowest treatment 0.57±0.13/kg inD
Kebijakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Tindak Pidana Pencurian dengan Modus Pecah Kaca Mobil dalam Perspektif Kriminologi (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Negeri Stabat No. 404/pid.b/2013/pn.stabat)
Thefts with modus operandi by breaking windshields happen frequently in Indonesia. Since it increases in number, research on it from the criminological perspective in necessary in order to find out the causing factors. The Penal law can be used as the means to overcome this theft. Overcoming this crime by penal law can be categorized into the forms of penal and non penal efforts. The objective of teh research is to find out the factors that constitute this theft and the policy of penal law to overcome it. The formulation of problems in the research are how the legal regulation are in regard to this theft, what the causing factors are, modus operandi are, and how the penal law policy is to overcome this theft.The method used in the research is the judicial normative method, namely a method based on the library study in order to obtain the materials that meet the requirements. The instruments of data gathering are guidelines of interviews and library study. According to the research result, the theft with modus operandi by breaking the windshields is categorized into a theft with aggravation which is regulated in the Article 363 of the Penal Law. Theaggravating element is that there is an effort from the perpetrators to break a thing that prevents them from conducting their action and it is conducted by more than 2 persons. The factors that cause the theft with modus operandi by breaking the windshields are habit, environment, and benefit. The policy of the penal law to overcome this kind of theft can be divided into the penal and non penal forms. These are divided again into pre-adjudication phase. The pre-adjudication phase is the phase of filing to the police before getting into phase of court session and the adjudication is the hearing of the theft perpetrator to the court. Meanwhile, in the non penal efforts, the police have made preventive efforts, such as, by patrolling at critical hours either while wearing casual clothes or uniform to prevent the occurence of the theft
Implementing ecological intensification in fish farming : definition and principles from contrasting experiences
Ecological intensification is a new concept in agriculture that addresses the double challenge of maintaining a level of production sufficient to support needs of human populations and respecting the environment in order to conserve the natural world and human quality of life. This article adapts this concept to fish farming using agroecological principles and the ecosystem services framework. The method was developed from the study of published literature and applications at four study sites chosen for their differences in production intensity: polyculture ponds in France, integrated pig and pond polyculture in Brazil, the culture of striped catfish in Indonesia and a recirculating salmon aquaculture system in France. The study of stakeholders' perceptions of ecosystem services combined with environmental assessment through Life Cycle Assessment and Emergy accounting allowed development of an assessment tool that was used as a basis for co-building evolution scenarios. From this experience, ecological intensification of aquaculture was defined as the use of ecological processes and functions to increase productivity, strengthen ecosystem services and decrease disservices. It is based on aquaecosystem and biodiversity management and the use of local and traditional knowledge. Expected consequences for farming systems consist of greater autonomy, efficiency and better integration into their surrounding territories. Ecological intensification requires territorial governance and helps improve it from a sustainable development perspective