9 research outputs found

    Graphical representation of the frequency distribution of proteases with modified activity associated with RA.

    No full text
    <p>Percentage frequency of peptide occurrences in the down-regulation group is plotted on the x-axis, whereas the percentage frequency of occurrences in the up-regulated group is plotted on the y-axis. Circled data points represent the proteases which activity is the most affected in RA compared to that of healthy controls (see <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0104625#pone-0104625-t004" target="_blank">Table 4</a>).</p

    Predictive analysis of changes in protease activity associated with peptides differentially regulated in RA <sup>1</sup>.

    No full text
    1<p>Frequency distribution analysis based on all peptides (n = 131).</p><p>Mathematical calculations are based on the following parameter and calculations:</p><p><b>occ(up)</b> = Sum of all occurrences for each individual protease in the up-regulated peptides,</p><p><b>occ(down)</b> = Sum of all occurrences for each individual protease in the down-regulated peptides,</p><p><b>N(up)</b> = Total number of peptides being up-regulated,</p><p><b>N(down)</b> = Total number of peptides being down-regulated,</p><p><b>% frequency(up)</b> = (occ(up)/N(up)) * 100.</p><p><b>% frequency(down)</b> = (occ(down)/N(down)) * 100.</p><p><b>% frequency difference ratio</b> = | ((freq%(up) − freq%(down))/(freq%(up)+freq%(down)) * 100 |.</p><p><b>Frequency scores</b> = %freq * (occ(up)-occ(down)).</p

    Urinary polypeptide signatures in cases and controls from the validation set based on 39 significantly different sequenced peptides.

    No full text
    <p>Normalized molecular weight (500–15000 Da) in logarithmic scale is plotted against normalized migration time (18–45 minutes). The mean signal intensity of the polypeptide peak is given in 3-dimensional depiction (n = 15 controls and 16 cases).</p

    Baseline characteristics of the training and test set populations (case and control)<sup>1</sup>.

    No full text
    <p>nd, not determined; ACPA, anti-citrullinated protein antibodies; RF, rheumatoid factor; DAS28, 28 joint count disease activity score; HAQ, health assessment questionnaire score; CRP, C-reactive protein.</p>1<p>Differences between training set and test set within both RA and control groups were not statistically significant (Mann-Whitney for continuous values and Chi Square for categorical values; p<0.05) with the exception for the proportion of female in the control group between the training and test sets (p<0.05).</p>2<p>Difference in the median age value between groups is statistically significant between RA and control groups of the training set (p = 0.0023) and between RA and control groups of the test set (p = 0.0059).</p>3<p>Difference in the gender distribution between groups is statistically significant between RA and control groups of the training set (p<0.01) but not between RA and control groups of the test set (p>0.05) (Chi Square test).</p>4<p>Data missing for 18 patients in the training set and 9 patients in test set, percentage refers to proportion of patients tested.</p
    corecore