Birds of isolated small forests in Uganda

This study concerns birds recorded from four small forests in Uganda, three of them being naturally isolated and the fourth being a fragment of the once extensive forests of southern Uganda. Whilst the forest interior birds in the natural forest islands might be considered subsets of those found in larger forests, the fact that the species composition in the three naturally isolated patches are almost completely different from each other, and in one case appear to have changed with time, suggests a major element of chance in which species occur where. There is also a strong indication of species turnover amongst the forest interior birds in these forests. The fact that, together and over time these small forests supported 37 forest interior species, suggests that, collectively, small forests (of which there are many in Uganda) do have conservation value. The evidence of species turnover with time, if confirmed, would increase the numbers of species involved and implies that even interior species do sometimes travel significant distances across other habitats

Two new records for Uganda

Volume: 14Start Page: 32End Page: 3

The Forest Birds of Kenya and Uganda

Robust and rapid ways of assessing and monitoring forest biodiversity are increasingly necessary. To this end, we present a classification of forest birds in Kenya and Uganda into three simple categories: forest-specialists (FF species), forest generalists (F species) and forest visitors (f species). FF and F species, but not f species, are dependent on forests. Out of 479 forest birds in the two countries, 214 are FF, 156 F and 109 f species. Forest-dependent birds, and particularly forest specialists, are less widespread than forest visitors. Uganda has 420 forest birds compared to Kenya's 335, and a higher proportion of forest specialists: this reflects differences in forest structure and biogeography, rather than the area of natural forest. Using this classification allows species lists and densities to be interpreted more meaningfully. The number of FF species is an initial measure of a forest's relative conservation importance, while the proportion of FF, F and f species and their relative abundance will shift according to changes in forest structure. Journal of East African Natural History Vol. 85 (1&2) 1996: pp. 23-4

Welfare and health of captive african grey parrots in Kampala, Uganda

A cross-sectional study was conducted to assess the living environment, feeding and health care of parrots kept as pets in homes within Kampala city, Uganda between January and May 2005. A multivariable logistic regression model was fitted to test the significance of housing attributes on the occurrence of feather loss and reported as adjusted odds ratios (AOR). A total of 148 parrots were studied in 97 homes, where 56 (38%) of the birds were in solitary confinement, while 82 (62%) were paired. All the parrots except a pair were apparently caught from the wild. Many (41%) cages were less than 1m2 in floor area while 44% of the cages had no perches. Most owners fed fresh unpelleted peanuts (91%), sugar cane (69%) and pepper (67%). Feather loss was the most prevalent condition observed with the risk of feather loss higher in birds kept solitary (AOR = 2.18: CI, 1.24, 3.98), those in small cages (AOR = 2.15: CI, 1.21, 2.47) and those in cages without perches (AOR = 2.12; 95% CI: 1.13-3.47). We observed that more than 40% of grey parrots kept as pets in Uganda were not provided comfortable living cages and were all fed principally on unprocessed seeds and grains, posing risks of malnutrition. Keywords: African grey parrots; pets; welfare; UgandaAnimal Production Research Advances Vol. 2 (3) 2006: pp. 139-14