Behavioral results obtained in Experiment 2.

<p>(A) Hit rates. (B) Reaction times. Bars represent the averaged hit rates or reaction times for the three modalities in the right (blue), or left IFC (red), and control region PZ (green). Error bars represent the standard error of the mean (<i>N</i> = 13).</p

Stimulation sites in the lateral frontal cortex.

<p>Location of (A) the left hemispheric and (B) the right hemispheric target area.</p

Stimulation sites in the superior temporal cortex.

<p>Location of (A) the left hemispheric and (B) the right hemispheric target area.</p

Impact of emotional intelligence on reaction times.

<p>Scatterplots illustrate the correlation between total EI and the reaction times for the “ironic” category calculated for slightly incongruent stimuli (<i>N</i> = 20, <i>r</i> = -.48, <i>p</i> = .02, one-tailed).</p

Overview of the different stimulus combinations.

<p>Overview of the different stimulus combinations.</p

Reaction times (mean ± standard deviation, measurement unit: ms) corresponding to congruent (CT), low conflict (LT) and high conflict trials (HT) as well as reaction time differences (mean ± standard deviation, measurement unit: ms) among trials obtained within each task (PI = prosody identification, SI = semantics identification, VI = vowel identification).

<p>Note: Slight discrepancies between (CT-HT)/(CT-LT)/(LT-HT) subtraction values and mean difference values reported in this table are due to rounding.</p

Reaction times (mean±standard deviation, measurement unit: ms) corresponding to congruent (CT), low conflict (LT) and high conflict trials (HT) as well as reaction time differences (mean±standard deviation, measurement unit: ms) between the different trial types obtained within each task (PI = prosody identification, SI = semantics identification, VI = vowel identification) and experimental group.

<p>Note: Slight discrepancies between (CT-HT)/(CT-LT)/(LT-HT) subtraction values and mean difference values reported in this table are due to rounding. Similarly discrepancies between overall means and corresponding averages of values reported for the patient group and healthy control group are introduced by rounding effects.</p

Additional file 1: of Effects of cue modality and emotional category on recognition of nonverbal emotional signals in schizophrenia

Signal detection analyses: Additional analysis of group specific signal detection rates and error patterns. (DOCX 33 kb

Accuracy rates (mean ± standard deviation) and reactions times (mean ± standard deviation; measurement unit: ms) obtained for the PD patients group and the group of healthy control participants within each task (PI = prosody identification, SI = semantics identification, VI = vowel identification).

<p>Accuracy rates (mean ± standard deviation) and reactions times (mean ± standard deviation; measurement unit: ms) obtained for the PD patients group and the group of healthy control participants within each task (PI =  prosody identification, SI =  semantics identification, VI  =  vowel identification).</p

Spearman’s rho values between emotional intelligence and nonverbal dominance for the two incongruent conditions.

<p>Spearman’s rho values between emotional intelligence and nonverbal dominance for the two incongruent conditions.</p