Continuing Medical Education in six European countries: A comparative analysis

Objective We examined Continuing Medical Education (CME) systems in a sample of six EU countries: Austria, Belgium, France, Italy, Norway, and the UK. The aim of this comparative study was to assess the main country-specific institutional settings applied by governments.Methods A common scheme of analysis was applied to investigate the following variables: (i) CME institutional framework; (ii) benefits and/or penalties to participants; (iii) types of CME activities and system of credits; (iv) accreditation of CME providers and events; (v) CME funding and sponsorship. The analysis involved reviewing the literature on CME policy and interviewing a selected panel of local experts in each country (at least one public manager, one representative of medical associations and one pharmaceutical manager).Results CME is formally compulsory in Austria, France, Italy and the UK, although no sanctions are enforced against non-compliant physicians in practice. The only two countries that offer financial incentives to enhance CME participation are Belgium and Norway, although limited to specific categories of physicians. Formal accreditation of CME providers is required in Austria, France and Italy, while in the other three countries accreditation is focused on activities. Private sponsorship is allowed in all countries but Norway, although within certain limits.Conclusions This comparative exercise provides an overview of the CME policies adopted by six EU countries to regulate both demand and supply. The substantial variability in the organization and accreditation of schemes indicates that much could be done to improve effectiveness. Although further analysis is needed to assess the results of these policies in practice, lessons drawn from this study may help clarify the weaknesses and strengths of single domestic policies in the perspective of pan-European CME harmonization.Continuing Medical Education European Union Comparative analysis

A Review of the Costs of Managing Childhood Epilepsy

Epilepsy is a chronic treatable condition for which new diagnostic tools and several new drugs and non-pharmacological treatments are now available. The cost profile of these options is assessed here through an overview of the available literature focusing on studies of childhood epilepsy. Several methodological problems arise when interpreting the results of economic studies in epilepsy, including the variability of the study population and costs items, the reliability of the sources of cost, the limitations of the methods of data collection and the deficiencies of the study designs, with reference to the measures of treatment benefits. International comparisons are then difficult because economic results cannot be compared on account of differences in monetary issues, clinical practice patterns and healthcare system frameworks. The economic aspects of epilepsy are different in children and adults. Differences are detectable in the incidence and expression of epileptic syndromes, social and emotional impact, availability of antiepileptic drugs, hospital admissions, diagnostic tests and referral to specialists, social assistants and other healthcare professionals. In addition, children have access to medical services only with the help of a caregiver, for whom there may be lost work days or under-employment. The mean annual cost per child with epilepsy was $US1853 for controlled epilepsy and$US4950 for uncontrolled epilepsy in a Spanish study performed in 1998 and the annual direct costs per child with epilepsy ranged from _844 for patients in remission to _3268 for patients with drug-resistant epilepsy in an Italian study done between 1996 and 1998. The Spanish study showed that direct costs are the major source of expenditure for children with epilepsy. These studies along with a number of other cost-of-illness studies in combined populations of adults and children showed that service use and costs increase with more severe forms of illness and seizure frequency, this being more marked in adults than in children. Moderate cost differences may be expected between children (higher) and adults (lower), particularly with reference to initial investigations. Costs of epilepsy are mostly explained by hospital admissions and drugs; in particular, drug costs tend to dominate in more well controlled epilepsy, while both hospital admissions and drugs are significant costs in less well controlled epilepsy. Newly diagnosed patients can incur significant hospital and diagnostic costs. Costs for epilepsy tend to be lower for patients cared for in general practice or outpatient settings than in hospital settings. Seizure control by drugs, ketogenic diet or surgery is associated with a significant reduction in the costs of epilepsy.Adolescents, Antiepileptic-drugs, Children, Cost-of-illness, Epilepsy, Pharmacoeconomics