30 research outputs found

    What is self-archiving - and why should I care?

    No full text
    <p>Slides for the workshop "What is self-archiving - and why should I care?" held on 2013-09-26 at the Free University of Bozen-Bolzano.</p> <p>The workshop aim is to inform the researchers of the Faculty of Computer Science @ Unibz on the right to self-archive their research articles, how to achieve it, when to perform it, and why they should do it.</p

    Presentation: guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering

    No full text
    <p>Abstract: Affects--emotions and moods--have an impact on cognitive processing activities and the working performance of individuals. It has been established that software development tasks are undertaken through cognitive processing activities. Therefore, we have proposed to employ psychology theory and measurements in software engineering (SE) research. We have called it "psychoempirical software engineering". However, we found out that existing SE research has often fallen into misconceptions about the affect of developers, lacking in background theory and how to successfully employ psychological measurements in studies. The contribution of this paper is threefold. (1) It highlights the challenges to conduct proper affect-related studies with psychology; (2) it provides a comprehensive literature review in affect theory; and (3) it proposes guidelines for conducting psychoempirical software engineering.</p> <p>Ā </p> <p>This is the presentation of the articleĀ </p> <p>D. Graziotin, X. Wang, and P. Abrahamsson, ā€œUnderstanding the Affect of Developers: Theoretical Background and Guidelines for Psychoempirical Software Engineeringā€, Proc. 2015 ACM 7th International Workshop on Social Software Engineering (SSE 2015), pp. 25-32, 2015. DOI 10.1145/2804381.2804386</p> <p>It only mentions the guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering because of restricted presentation time.</p

    PDF for embedding: guidelines for psychoempirical software engineering

    No full text
    <p>This file is for embedding purposes. Please seeĀ http://figshare.com/articles/Presentation_guidelines_for_psychoempirical_software_engineering/1528237</p

    Making Sense out of a Jungle of JavaScript Frameworks PROFES 2013 Presentation

    No full text
    <p>This is the presentation for the short paper "Making Sense out of a Jungle of JavaScript Frameworks - Towards a Practitioner-friendly Comparative Analysis" presented at the 14th International Conference on Product-focused Software Process Improvement, 12-14 June, Paphos, Cyprus.</p> <p>The final publication is available at link.springer.com but an eprint is also availabe.</p> <p>Abstract</p> <p>The field of Web development is entering the HTML5 and CSS3 era and JavaScript is becoming increasingly influential. A large number of JavaScript frameworks have been recently promoted. Practitioners applying the latest technologies need to choose a suitable JavaScript framework (JSF) in order to abstract the frustrating and complicated coding steps and to provide a cross-browser compatibility. Apart from benchmark suites and recommendation from experts, there is little research helping practitioners to select the most suitable JSF to a given situation. The few proposals employ software metrics on the JSF, but practitioners are driven by different concerns when choosing a JSF. As an answer to the critical needs, this paper is a call for action. It proposes a research design towards a comparative analysis framework of JSF, which merges researcher needs and practitioner needs</p
    corecore