Test of variables of attention (TOVA) as a predictor of early attention complaints, an antecedent to dementia

The goal of this study was to determine if impairments detected by the test of variables of attention (TOVA) may be used to predict early attention complaints and memory impairments accurately in a clinical setting. We performed a statistical analysis of outcomes in a patient population screened for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder or attention complaints, processing errors as measured by TOVA and the Wechsler Memory Scale (WMS-III) results. Attention deficit disorder (ADD) checklists, constructed using the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders 4th Edition criteria, which were completed by patients at PATH Medical, revealed that 72.8% of the patients had more than one attention complaint out of a total of 16 complaints, and 41.5% had more than five complaints. For the 128 males with a significant number of ADD complaints, individuals whose scores were significantly deviant or borderline (SDB) on TOVA, had a significantly greater number of attention complaints compared with normals for omissions (P < 0.02), response time (P < 0.015), and variability (P < 0.005), but not commissions (P > 0.50). For males, the mean scores for auditory, visual, immediate, and working memory scores as measured by the WMS-III were significantly greater for normals versus SDBs on the TOVA subtest, ie, omission (P < 0.01) and response time (P < 0.05), but not variability or commissions. The means for auditory, visual, and immediate memory scores were significantly greater for normals versus SDBs for variability (P < 0.045) only. In females, the mean scores for visual and working memory scores were significantly greater for normals versus SDBs for omissions (P < 0.025). The number of SDB TOVA quarters was a significant predictor for “impaired” or “normal” group membership for visual memory (P < 0.015), but not for the other three WMS-III components. For males, the partial correlation between the number of attention complaints and the number of SDB TOVA quarters was also significant (r = 0.251, P < 0.005). For the 152 females with a significant number of attention complaints, no significant differences between SDBs and normals were observed (P > 0.15). This is the first report, to our knowledge, which provides evidence that TOVA is an accurate predictor of early attention complaints and memory impairments in a clinical setting. This finding is more robust for males than for females between the ages of 40 and 90 years

Usability Evaluation of Access Ramps in Transit Buses: Preliminary Findings

The research literature on access ramps used in transit vehicles is undermined by inconsistent methodologies used across studies, thus providing an inconclusive evidence base for proposed Federal guidelines that would impose a maximum 1:6 slope for all deployment situations. The current study assessed the usability of ramp slope for mobility aid users. Four access ramp slopes were evaluated, with 27 adults representing three populations: manual wheelchair users, power wheelchair users, and people with vision impairment who use a cane or service animal. The dependent variables included five usability measures. The 1:8 and 1:12 slopes were usable and acceptable for most participants. The data indicate that the 1:4 slope is too steep for safe unassisted boarding and disembarking. Many manual wheelchair users lacked the strength needed for unassisted ascent. Power wheelchair users and people with vision impairment expressed safety concerns about descent of steeper slopes. Conclusive interpretations should be cautiously drawn because the sample size was relatively small and did not include users of scooters or ambulation aids

Improving Emergency Department Efficiency Through Easier Access to Policies

Objectives We aim to help residents, faculty and auxiliary staff to more easily locate and use institutional clinical policies. To improve patient safety by having the institutionally developed policies be more readily available.https://jdc.jefferson.edu/patientsafetyposters/1101/thumbnail.jp

Amnestic <i>vs.</i> Nonamnestic in NM and HM patients.

*<p>The majority of hypometabolic patients were found to be multi domain according to the MCI Domain Assessment.</p

Means, SDs, and t-tests of HM <i>vs.</i> NM subjects.

*<p>TOVA = Test of Variables of Attention; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam; CNSM = Memory score from the CNS Vital Signs Test.</p

Means, SDs, and significance of subjects with and without memory complaints (Cx).

*<p>TOVA = Test of Variables of Attention; MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam.</p

Overall Classification of Subjects.

<p>Overall Classification of Subjects.</p

Brain regions affected in HM subjects.

*<p>Subjects overlapped in categories.</p

MCI Domain Assessment.

*<p>MCI Patient Checklist.</p