Obstetrical Trauma: Reducing the Burden of Trauma Transfer to Tertiary Care Centers

BACKGROUND: In rural state trauma systems, management of the obstetrical trauma patient often defaults to transfer to level I trauma centers. We evaluate the necessity of transferring obstetrical trauma patients without severe maternal injury. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective 5-year review of obstetrical trauma patients admitted to a rural state-level I trauma center was conducted. Injury severity measures such as abdominal AIS, ISS, and GCS were correlated with outcomes. Furthermore, the impact of maternal and gestational age on uterine compromise, uterine irritability, and the need for cesarean section intervention are presented. RESULTS: Twenty-one percent of patients were transferred from outside facilities with a median age of 29 years, average ISS of 3.9 ± 5.6, GCS of 13.8 ± 3.6, and abdominal AIS of 1.6 ± .8. Outcomes included maternal fatality of 2%, fetal demise of 4%, 6% experienced premature rupture of membranes, 9% experienced fetal placental compromise, 15% had uterine contractions, 15% of cesarean deliveries, and fetal decelerations occurred in 4%. Predictors of fetal compromise are strongly associated with high maternal ISS and low GCS. DISCUSSION: The frequency of traumatic injury in this unique population of patients is fortunately limited. The best predictor for fetal demise and uterine irritability is maternal injury severity, measured by ISS and GCS. Therefore, without severe maternal trauma, obstetrical trauma patients with minor injuries can safely be managed at non-tertiary care facilities with obstetrical capabilities

Assessing the Need for Transfer to a Trauma Center for Isolated Craniofacial Injury in a Rural State

Management of craniofacial injuries typically defaults to plastic, ophthalmology, and oral maxillofacial surgeons which can challenge these surgical subspecialists\u27 capacity to care for both trauma victims and non-trauma patients. Evaluating the need to transfer patients to a higher level of trauma care for isolated craniofacial injuries warrants investigation. Our 5-year retrospective study measured the frequency of craniofacial injuries and subsequent surgical interventions in elderly trauma patients\u27 ≥65 years old. Eighty-one percent of patients consulted with plastic surgeons and 28% with ophthalmology. Twenty percent had craniofacial surgery with the majority of surgical interventions were in soft tissue (97%), mandible (48%), and Le Fort III (29%) injuries. A patient\u27s ISS, GCS, head and face AIS, and presents of spinal or brain injury had no statistically significant impact on injury repair. Elderly patients with isolated craniofacial trauma may be better served by pretransfer consultation with a surgical subspecialist to determine the necessity

Biometric Analysis of Surgeons\u27 Physiologic Responses During Surgery

BACKGROUND: Much has been written from the social science perspective surrounding surgeons\u27 stress and burn out. The literature is sparse in reference to scientific investigations of the hemodynamic effect of that stress. This prospective clinical study quantifies the physiologic impact of performing surgery upon the acute care surgeon. METHODS: Over 2.5 years, monitoring devices were affixed to surgeons prior to entering the operating room, and physiologic variables were documented every 30 minutes. Qualifying cases were projected as being greater than 2 hours with a baseline preoperative measurement obtained. Variables recorded included blood pressure (BP), heart rate (HR), rate pressure product (RPP), oxygen saturation (O sat), and end-tidal carbon dioxide (ET CO). RESULTS: Statistically significant differences ( \u3c .05) were found between baseline data to the maximum recording during the surgical operation for: BP (min 101 ± 6.6 (mmHg)-max 117 ± 5.1 (mmHg)), HR (min 70.5 ± 6.2 (bpm)-max 83.7 ± 9.0 (bpm)), O sat (min 97 ± 2.0 (%)-max 100 ± 0.22(%)), and ET CO (min 34.1 ± 1.15 mmHg-max 38 ± 1.7 mmHg) ( \u3c .0001). The RPP ranged from 10.49 mmHg/min to 15.88 mmHg/min with a mean of 14.00 mmHg/min. DISCUSSION: The practice of surgery is considered demanding in training and lifestyle in comparison to other medical specialties. This data is among the first to demonstrate the negative physiological impact of surgery upon the metabolic demand of the surgeon. The longitudinal implications of increased physiologic demand over time may have cardiovascular and cerebrovascular consequences

Variability in Perioperative Fasting Practices Negatively Impacts Nutritional Support of Critically Ill Intubated Patients.

The aim of the study was to quantify nutritional losses related to pre- and postoperative fasts in critically ill intubated patients and to explore whether shorter fasts are safe and appropriate in this population. A retrospective review of mechanically ventilated adults undergoing surgery more than 24 hours after admission to a Level I trauma center over 15 months was done, which yielded 132 procedures and 81 unique patients. Ninety per cent of preoperative periods and 43 per cent of postoperative periods were affected by nonmedical barriers to feeding. Eighty-two per cent of gastrically fed nonemergent cases were fasted for longer than the 6-hour American Society of Anesthesiologists guideline, whereas 91 per cent of emergent cases had shorter fasts. There were no anesthetic complications, placing an upper limit of 6 per cent on the rate of aspiration for fasts shorter than six hours (95% confidence). Forty-three per cent of cases did not resume tube feeds within 90 minutes postoperatively, and only 37 per cent had a documented justification for delay. Intubated patients were frequently fasted preoperatively for longer than recommended and postoperatively for longer than medically indicated. No complications were observed with shorter-than-guideline fasts. This strengthens the evidence that standard preoperative fasting is unnecessary and deleterious in many critically ill intubated patients. New protocols and national guidelines are needed to ensure adequate nutrition

American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Stop the Bleed Program : Quantifying the Impact of Training Upon Public School Educators Readiness

BACKGROUND: School violence continues to afflict our educational institutions. In response, an institutional initiative was launched to train educators and school support staff in life-saving skills aimed at hemorrhage control. METHODS: The American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma Stop the Bleed (STB) Program was promoted as a quality improvement initiative to schools within the geographic catchment area of this Level I Trauma Center. Participants were given the opportunity to take precourse, and postcourse confidence inventories using a Likert Scale. Statistical analysis of the 324 precourse to postcourse evaluations measuring change in confidence was used to evaluate improvement in readiness of school systems to respond in mass casualty incidents. RESULTS: Students enrolled in the STB Program were offered the opportunity to assess their confidence precourse and postcourse in reference to 7 questions. Precourse and postcourse Likert Scale inventories were compared and analyzed to assess the strength of the improvement in confidence using Student\u27s -test, where \u3c .05 is statistically significant. Students demonstrated improvement ( \u3c .006) that was statistically significant across all 7-question relating to enhance confidence postcourse compared with the precourse. DISCUSSION: This STB quality initiative has demonstrated a statistically significant improvement in the confidence of teachers and school personnel to render lifesaving care in the event of a mass casualty or isolated incident of life-threatening hemorrhage. These results support the validity of the training in making a difference in this subpopulation of responders

Assessing the Need for Transfer to a Trauma Center for Isolated Craniofacial Injury in a Rural State

Management of craniofacial injuries typically defaults to plastic, ophthalmology, and oral maxillofacial surgeons which can challenge these surgical subspecialists\u27 capacity to care for both trauma victims and non-trauma patients. Evaluating the need to transfer patients to a higher level of trauma care for isolated craniofacial injuries warrants investigation. Our 5-year retrospective study measured the frequency of craniofacial injuries and subsequent surgical interventions in elderly trauma patients\u27 ≥65 years old. Eighty-one percent of patients consulted with plastic surgeons and 28% with ophthalmology. Twenty percent had craniofacial surgery with the majority of surgical interventions were in soft tissue (97%), mandible (48%), and Le Fort III (29%) injuries. A patient\u27s ISS, GCS, head and face AIS, and presents of spinal or brain injury had no statistically significant impact on injury repair. Elderly patients with isolated craniofacial trauma may be better served by pretransfer consultation with a surgical subspecialist to determine the necessity

Transdiaphragmatic Chest Wall Herniation

BACKGROUND: The combination of traumatic simultaneous diaphragmatic rupture and chest wall herniation remains rare, with 42 cases of traumatic transdiaphragmatic intercostal hernia (TDIH) reported in the literature since 1946. An accurate count of cases is difficult to obtain, as TDIH nomenclature has been variable. Risk factors for traumatic TDIH are not well established. As these injuries are uncommon, best management techniques have yet to be established. Reported repair techniques include primary closure, closure with mesh, and implantation of prosthetic or autologous material. We present our single-center series of 7 patients, the largest reported to our knowledge, and discuss the challenges of repairing these difficult injuries. METHODS: After obtaining institutional review board approval, data were abstracted from the electronic medical record on all adults who underwent evaluation and treatment for traumatic TDIH between July 2014 and January 2019. RESULTS: Of the 7 cases of traumatic TDIH, 6 patients developed TDIH secondary to cough; the seventh patient presented with chronic chest wall pain after an episode of heavy lifting. All patients were obese or overweight. Pain and a popping sensation were the most common presenting symptoms. All patients underwent operative intervention with primary repair of the diaphragm and suture approximation of the ribs. 3 patients had onlay mesh repair of the chest wall and/or abdominal wall. 1 patient had plating of his rib fracture. 3 patients had a recurrence of the intercostal portion of the hernia No patients have undergone reoperation thus far. DISCUSSION: While previously thought to more commonly occur on the left side due to the protective effects of the diaphragm, the majority in this series had right-sided injuries. Herniation through the ninth-10th interspace remains the most common location. Computed tomography imaging should be used for diagnosis and operative planning. It is best to manage these hernias acutely to re-establish normal anatomy. Mesh may be required in delayed reconstructions of if the chest wall cannot be re-approximated. Rib plating should be considered in cases of instability or flail. High rates of complications are not unexpected given the complicated and rare nature of the injury. Given the high rate of intercostal hernia recurrence, it is likely that mesh repair or should be more often used in the treatment of this injury

An assessment of patient satisfaction with nonoperative management of clavicular fractures using the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure.

BACKGROUND: Clavicle fractures historically have been managed without internal fixation. Current literature is raising questions regarding this management as opposed to offering operative fixation in some instances. This study addresses the use of the Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder and Hand (DASH) outcomes measure to identify those that have the least satisfaction with nonoperative care of the clavicle fracture based upon clavicular deformity and variation in fracture location based upon Allman Classification. METHODS: Patients having suffered clavicle fractures were mailed the DASH Outcomes Questionnaire to be completed and returned. A total of 113 surveys were returned completed with 92 being of value for evaluation. Patient chest or clavicle radiographs were evaluated, and measurements were made of the clavicle fractures for amount of separation or shortening and grade according to Allman Classification. Statistical evaluation compared DASH Scores (patient satisfaction as outcome measure) to the Allman Classification and the degree of separation or shortening. Comparison of categorical variables was performed using Fisher\u27s exact test. Comparison of continuous variables was preformed using Student\u27s t test. Statistical significance was demonstrated by a p value of less than 0.05. RESULTS: Patients with clavicular shortening of greater than 2 cm were found to have the highest DASH score indicating dissatisfaction and disability with their outcome postinjury (p = 0.0001). Separation or lengthening seemed to be associated with lower DASH Scores. Patients with Allmen Classification I (midshaft clavicle) fractures had higher DASH score than other fracture locations (p = 0.0001). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with midshaft clavicle fractures with shortening of greater than 2 cm may be good candidates for operative repair given the degree of dissatisfaction with nonoperative management of these fractures as assessed by long-term outcome measures of disability