Acceptability and attitude towards use of digital interventions in substance use disorders psychosocial treatment: : a study of healthcare providers at a Methadone Clinic in Kenya

Digital interventions have been used for psychosocial treatment in substance use disorder but there is limited research on their application in Kenya. Determining the acceptability and attitude towards use of digital intervention in substance use disorder psychosocial treatment is important. The aim of this study was to assess the acceptability and attitude of healthcare providers towards use of digitalinterventions for psychosocial treatment at a methadone clinic in Kenya. A descriptive cross-sectional survey was carried out among healthcare providers. A structured self-administered questionnaire was used to collect data on sociodemographic variables, acceptability and attitude towards use of digital interventions in substance use disorder treatment. Technology acceptance model (TAM) was used as conceptual basis for this study. Data was analyzed using SPSS whereby a descriptive analysis was conducted and Pearson’s coefficient used to assess the relationship between the TAM constructs. The data is summarized in tables, figures graphs. Twenty-one health care providers participated comprising 76.2% females and mean age of 33 (SD 6.9) years, of which 66.7% had training in addiction and 23.8% had ever used digital intervention previously. Acceptability was high with 90.5% agreeing that psychosocial treatment can be provided through digital interventions, 80.9% reported digital intervention would improve access to treatment and 76.2% viewed a digital intervention as cost effective. Majority (76.2%) agreed that digital intervention can influence substance use and patients would benefit from the intervention. Using the technology acceptance model, perceived ease of use was associated with perceived usefulness and attitude toward using; and perceived usefulness was associated with attitude towards use. The findings show  high acceptability and positive attitude towards use of digital interventions in substance use disorder treatment among the health care providers at a methadone clinic. This can inform design and implementation of digital interventions among individuals with substance use disorders in Kenya

The burden of care, quality of life and depression in relatives of patients with serious mental illness treated at Lentegeur Hospital

Background: The association between caregiver burden, quality of life and depression in patients with mental illness in a resource-limited setting is underresearched. Factors associated with caregiver burden may be amenable to intervention. Aim: To describe the level of caregiver burden and its association with quality of life and depression. Methods: The cross-sectional study was carried out in a psychiatric hospital in the Cape Flats, which is an urban area on the periphery of Cape Town. Data were collected from 104 caregivers of patients attending the outpatients service. Caregiver burden was measured using the Zarit Burden Interview questionnaire. The PHQ-9 questionnaire was to screen and measure severity of symptoms of depression. The WHOQOL-BREF was used to measure the subjective evaluation of the quality of life. Results: Most caregivers were female (76.92%), and caregivers were mild to moderately stressed (mean ZBS score 33.38 ± 21.59) and experienced moderate depression (mean PHQ-9 score). These effects were significantly associated with quality of life in psychological and social domains. Conclusion: Caring for patients with mental illness can lead to immense physical and psychological distress, leading to poor quality of life. Strategies that may reduce the burden of care may include improving the patients’ quality of life and addressing psychosocial support, and clinicians should consider screening for symptoms of depression in caregivers

Traditional and faith-based healthcare in the management of psychotic disorders in Africa:in search for synergy

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review summarizes the current literature on the role of traditional and faith-based healthcare in the management of psychotic disorders in Africa.RECENT FINDINGS: In contemporary Africa, individuals with psychosis and traditional and faith healers (TFH) are pluralistic towards their understanding of psychosis and their help-seeking behaviour. Traditional healing is perceived to be helpful to patients with psychotic disorders and their family members and may have a positive influence on the course of psychosis in some selected individuals. Studies show that potentially harmful practices are commonly used by African TFH, but that these are associated with a lack of resources and are susceptible to training. Although various TFH and biomedical practitioners are open to collaboration, the many identified obstacles hinder actual partnerships. However, the few studies that have been conducted on collaborative care for patients with psychotic disorders on the continent, show positive outcomes.SUMMARY: Rather than harmonizing the two healing paradigms, synergistic collaboration between traditional/faith-based and biomedical mental healthcare in the management of individuals with psychosis seems to be possible within certain limits. Synergistic collaboration is more culturally syntonic and may actually contribute to bridging the treatment gap for mental disorders in present-day Africa.</p

Large scale genetic research on neuropsychiatric disorders in african populations is needed

In recent years there have been significant insights into the complex aetiologies of neurodevelopmental brain disorders. For example, neuropsychiatric genetics has achieved success with the identification of 108 loci for schizophrenia (Schizophrenia Working Group of the Psychiatric Genomics Consortium, 2014). Furthermore, meta-analyses of genomewide association study (GWAS) results encompassing thousands of samples have been completed for other psychiatric disorders including attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), autis

Factors affecting specialist psychiatry training in South Africa: Bullying during specialist psychiatric training?

CITATION: Beath, N. et al. 2021. Factors affecting specialist psychiatry training in South Africa : bullying during specialist psychiatric training? South African Medical Journal, 111(4):280, doi:10.7196/SAMJ.2021.v111i4.15518.The original publication is available at http://www.samj.org.zaAs many of us served as members of the Council of Psychiatrists, Colleges of Medicine of South Africa, for the triennium 2017 - 2020, we were keen to understand how workplace experiences and supervision could affect training and examination outcomes in South African (SA) centres. We conducted a cross-sectional, descriptive study of registrar trainees in psychiatry at the University of the Witwatersrand, the University of Cape Town, the University of KwaZulu-Natal, the University of Pretoria, the University of the Free State, Stellenbosch University, the University of Limpopo, and Walter Sisulu University between 1 June and 30 November 2019. We made use of an online survey that included questions on bullying/discrimination. All questions were closed-ended.Publisher's versio

South Africa’s Psychiatric training capacity in 2008 and in 2018. Has training capacity improved?

Background: There is a deficit of psychiatrists in South Africa, and to our knowledge, there is no situational analysis of training posts for psychiatrists in the country. Aim: To compare the number of specialists and subspecialists in training and training posts available in 2008 and 2018. Setting: South African medical schools with departments of psychiatry. Methods: A situational analysis involving data collection through a survey completed by eight heads of academic psychiatric departments followed by a comparative analysis of the two aforementioned years. Results: Data shows an 11% increase in funded and unfunded posts combined and a 9.3% increase in funded posts. The occupancy of funded posts decreased (92% in 2008 to 82% in 2018). When considering both funded and unfunded posts, only three more psychiatrists were being trained in 2018. Supernumeraries appointed in unfunded posts can be expected to return to their countries of origin. As such, a decrease in filled funded posts likely reflects a decrease in training psychiatrists destined to work in South Africa. While child and adolescent psychiatry was the only sub-speciality with accredited training posts in 2008, all sub-specialities included on the questionnaire had accredited training posts in 2018, and the number of accredited training posts in child and adolescent psychiatry doubled. That said, many of the posts were unfunded and vacant. Conclusion: While there was an increase in posts from 2008 to 2018, many posts remained unfilled. As such, not only are additional funded training posts required but also strategies to increase post-occupancy and successful completion of training. Contribution: This study is the first situational analysis of specialist and subspecialist training posts in Psychiatry in South Africa, at two time points over a 10 year period, that draws on academic heads of departments of psychiatry as respondents. The study highlights the nominal increase in funded training posts over this period, especially subspecialist training posts. The majority of Health Professions Council of South Africa (HPCSA) accredited subspecialities in Psychiatry have no funded training posts which is particularly concerning

The African Global Mental Health Institute: Increasing capacity, inclusivity and translation of psychiatric research and care

The largest treatment gap for mental, neurological and substance use (MNS) disorders to date exists in Sub-Saharan Africa (e.g., South Africa, Malawi, Nigeria).  While efforts have been made to reduce the global burden of MNS disorders, there remain significant barriers to delivery of equitable mental health care in Africa and the diaspora. These barriers are deeply rooted in a lack of research structures to inform care delivery, few outlets to train in-country mental health professionals, and limited involvement of policymakers in translation of research findings. Given the demonstrated need across domains of research, education, service delivery and policy in Africa, it is in the purview of global leaders and mental health professionals to build the infrastructure necessary to make systematic, targeted strides to develop each of these areas. With this conceptual framework in mind, over fifty global leaders, psychiatrists, mental health professionals and advocates with expertise in cultural psychiatry convened at a global conference in Cape Town, South Africa in 2016 to establish the African Global Mental Health Institute (AGMHI). The AGMHI is an organizational effort that aims to reduce the global burden of mental illness through research, education and training, service delivery, and policy. Aligned with mental health initiatives posited by the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank, the AGMHI represents an opportunity to explore and understand cultural nuance among populations in Africa and the diaspora. This article focuses on the AGMHI’s targeted strategies in the following actions: 1) bolstering training and education programs for clinicians and/or researchers in Africa and the diaspora to increase human capacity for mental health; 2) conducting and disseminating inclusive, culturally-relevant research (e.g., research that involves community stakeholders in its design and conduct) to meet the urgent need for a culturally-relevant evidence base;  3) identifying key stakeholders to promote sustainable mental health care and inform policy; and 4) fostering local and global collaborations (e.g., engaging local and national governments, non-governmental organizations (NGO), academic institutions, etc.) to share methods of improving access to mental health services. In concert with empirical data, these strategies were devised by members of the AGMHI, which is comprised of international leaders with decades of expertise in global psychiatry. While the MNS disorder treatment gap remains at large, the AGMHI believes these specific strategies are a step toward reducing the treatment gap and enhancing mental health care access globally

Global mental health: the role of collaboration during the COVID-19 pandemic

T32 MH116140 - NIMH NIH HHSPublished versio

Epidemiology of Untreated Psychoses in 3 Diverse Settings in the Global South

Importance: Less than 10% of research on psychotic disorders has been conducted in settings in the Global South, which refers broadly to the regions of Latin America, Asia, Africa, and Oceania. There is a lack of basic epidemiological data on the distribution of and risks for psychoses that can inform the development of services in many parts of the world. / Objective: To compare demographic and clinical profiles of cohorts of cases and rates of untreated psychoses (proxy for incidence) across and within 3 economically and socially diverse settings in the Global South. Two hypotheses were tested: (1) demographic and clinical profiles of cases with an untreated psychotic disorder vary across setting and (2) rates of untreated psychotic disorders vary across and within setting by clinical and demographic group. / Design, Setting, and Participants: The International Research Program on Psychotic Disorders in Diverse Settings (INTREPID II) comprises incidence, case-control, and cohort studies of untreated psychoses in catchment areas in 3 countries in the Global South: Kancheepuram District, India; Ibadan, Nigeria; and northern Trinidad. Participants were individuals with an untreated psychotic disorder. This incidence study was conducted from May 1, 2018, to July 31, 2020. In each setting, comprehensive systems were implemented to identify and assess all individuals with an untreated psychosis during a 2-year period. Data were analyzed from January 1 to May 1, 2022. / Main Outcomes and Measures: The presence of an untreated psychotic disorder, assessed using the Schedules for Clinical Assessment in Neuropsychiatry, which incorporate the Present State Examination. / Results: Identified were a total of 1038 cases, including 64 through leakage studies (Kancheepuram: 268; median [IQR] age, 42 [33-50] years; 154 women [57.5%]; 114 men [42.5%]; Ibadan: 196; median [IQR] age, 34 [26-41] years; 93 women [47.4%]; 103 men [52.6%]; Trinidad: 574; median [IQR] age, 30 [23-40] years; 235 women [40.9%]; 339 men [59.1%]). Marked variations were found across and within settings in the sex, age, and clinical profiles of cases (eg, lower percentage of men, older age at onset, longer duration of psychosis, and lower percentage of affective psychosis in Kancheepuram compared with Ibadan and Trinidad) and in rates of untreated psychosis. Age- and sex-standardized rates of untreated psychoses were approximately 3 times higher in Trinidad (59.1/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 54.2-64.0) compared with Kancheepuram (20.7/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 18.2-23.2) and Ibadan (14.4/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 12.3-16.5). In Trinidad, rates were approximately 2 times higher in the African Trinidadian population (85.4/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 76.0-94.9) compared with the Indian Trinidadian (43.9/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 35.7-52.2) and mixed populations (50.7/100 000 person-years; 95% CI, 42.0-59.5). / Conclusions and Relevance: This analysis adds to research that suggests that core aspects of psychosis vary by historic, economic, and social context, with far-reaching implications for understanding and treatment of psychoses globally