11 research outputs found
Scatterplots of physical function against brain volumetric parameters.
<p>Note. The scatterplots are from the final models accounting for all listed covariates, with the regression line and 95% C.I. displayed. The β and p-value are for the physical function measure, while the R<sup>2</sup> is for the overall model. The final scatterplot shows the association between change in physical function and NAWM volume (the only significant association with change in physical function), and for clarity of illustration, extreme outliers were removed; the inclusion/exclusion of outliers did not alter the regression results. Scatterplots for the Wave 2 physical function measures were similar and are not reported here. See <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0080386#pone.0080386.s005" target="_blank">Figures S1-S3</a> for scatterplots for the individual physical function measures (extreme outliers in the final scatterplots of these figures were retained for illustrative purposes, though their inclusion/exclusion did not alter the regression results).</p
Number (%) of subjects with incidental findings (IF), WMH according to visual rating by Fazekas score and atrophy against a visual population normal for age template. Fazekas total score = sum of deep and periventricular WMH scores.
<p>Bold indicates WMH scores consistent with moderate to severe WMH and atrophy at or above the upper limit of normal for age. The scale indicates a) the summed deep (0–3) and periventricular (0–3) Fazekas scores = total WMH score of 0–6, and b) the atrophy scores where 1 = <25<sup>th</sup> centile, 2 = 25–50<sup>th</sup> centile, 3 = 50–75<sup>th</sup> centile, 4 = 75–95<sup>th</sup> centile, 5 = just above 95<sup>th</sup> centile and 6 = considerably above the 95<sup>th</sup> centile for age.</p
The proportion of subjects by Fazekas visual rating score.
<p>The proportion of subjects by Fazekas visual rating score.</p
Number of subjects with several of the same type of finding within the stroke lesion section of Table 1.
<p>Number of subjects with several of the same type of finding within the stroke lesion section of <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0071467#pone-0071467-t001" target="_blank">Table 1</a>.</p
Examples of incidental findings in the LBC1936: (a) pituitary adenoma, (b) giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm, (c) Lhermitte-Duclos disease and (d) pleomorphic salivary adenoma.
<p>Examples of incidental findings in the LBC1936: (a) pituitary adenoma, (b) giant middle cerebral artery aneurysm, (c) Lhermitte-Duclos disease and (d) pleomorphic salivary adenoma.</p
The proportion of subjects with each atrophy visual rating scores.
<p>The proportion of subjects with each atrophy visual rating scores.</p
Descriptive statistics for raw hippocampal, intracranial and total brain tissue volumes, grouped by genotype.
<p>Note. All volumes are in mm<sup>3</sup>, estimated marginal means adjusted for age and gender. ICV-corrected = additionally adjusted for intracranial volume, TBV-corrected = additionally adjusted for total brain tissue volume.</p
Basic demographic and clinical data for the current sample.
<p>Note. SD = standard deviation, MMSE = Mini-Mental State Exam (maximum score of 30). These data are based on the sample of participants with successfully segmented hippocampal volumes, once those participants with reported dementia, or with MMSE scores ≤24 (or missing) around the time of MRI, were removed. </p
Translocase of outer membrane 40 (<i>TOMM40</i>) ‘<i>523</i>’ poly-T repeat genotype and hippocampal volumes.
<p>Note. Age at time of testing and gender statistically controlled. ICV-corrected = intracranial volume included as a covariate, TBV-corrected = total brain tissue volume included as a covariate.</p
Summary of previous large cross-sectional studies (i.e. N > 135) examining <i>APOE</i> ε4 genotype and hippocampal volumes in non-demented, community dwelling older adults.
<p>Note. The age mean and standard deviation data provided above for Lemaitre et al., Den Heijer et al. and Hostage et al. are weighted estimates; see those reports for exact age data</p