47 research outputs found
A software tool for evaluating the effects of culture on military operations
This paper presents the military rationale for developing an
improved understanding of the effects of culture on the
performance of military organizations and their partners. In
particular the change from conventional high intensity warfare
to asymmetric warfare increases the interactions
between different cultures within multi-national military
forces and in the local populations. A brief description of
culture and cultural attributes is presented. A culture-based
evaluation tool (the Soft Factors Modeling Tool), which has
been developed by the authors, is described
The evaluation of cultural factors and their potential effects on military operations
This paper provides the background rationale for and description of a prototype culture tool,
the Soft Factors Modelling Tool (SFMT), which is one of the outputs of a DTC-funded
research project. Following an introduction, the paper considers several issues associated
with autonomy and culture. A description of the researchersâ Soft Factors Modelling Toolâ
and its application is provided
Managing the lifecycle of your robot
âRobotâ for this paper is assumed to be a cognitive device, acting as a co-worker within a team of human workers: a mobile device, with a degree of autonomy, interchangeable prostheses, interacting freely with surrounding humans, in a civilian environment.
An exemplar lifecycle is the MoDâs CADMID lifecycle., and the paper concentrates on the In-service phase, for reasons of space. The approach is from a management perspective; a road-map is provided to acquire a robot, to put it to work, and to support both it and the team during its in-service phase. The emphasis is on what management needs to consider and the structures that need to be in place in order to run this process
Ergonomic issues arising from the `Next Manufacturing Revolution'
The paper outlines briefly the contents of the government-sponsored document, âThe Next Manufacturing Revolutionâ, with its emphasis on practices appropriate to the demands for sustainability required by population growth and emissions control, and then explores some of the implications of the contents for the practice of ergonomics, particularly in relation to job design. It is clear that there are some significant extensions required to the knowledge classes, processes and practices of ergonomists; there are also some implications for the Instituteâs role as a source of advice
Maintaining systems-of-systems fit-for-purpose
The objective of this research is to create a method and process for the engineering of system characteristics so that composing Systems-of-Systems (SoS) that have experienced unpredictable changes in operation, composition or external factors can be maintained Fit-For-Purpose (FFP)
Global drivers, sustainable manufacturing and systems ergonomics
This paper briefly explores the expected impact of the âGlobal Driversâ (such as population demographics,
food security; energy security; community security and safety), and the role of sustainability engineering
in mitigating the potential effects of these Global Drivers. The message of the paper is that sustainability
requires a significant input from Ergonomics/Human Factors, but the profession needs some expansion in
its thinking in order to make this contribution.
Creating a future sustainable world in which people experience an acceptable way of life will not
happen without a large input from manufacturing industry into all the Global Drivers, both in delivering
products that meet sustainability criteria (such as durability, reliability, minimised material requirement
and low energy consumption), and in developing sustainable processes to deliver products for sustainability
(such as minimum waste, minimum emissions and low energy consumption). Appropriate
changes are already being implemented in manufacturing industry, including new business models, new
jobs and new skills.
Considerable high-level planning around the world is in progress and is bringing about these changes;
for example, there is the US âAdvanced Manufacturing National Programâ (AMNP)â, the German âIndustrie
4.0â plan, the French plan âla nouvelle France industrielleâ and the UK Foresight publications on the
âFuture of Manufacturingâ.
All of these activities recognise the central part that humans will continue to play in the new
manufacturing paradigms; however, they do not discuss many of the issues that systems ergonomics
professionals acknowledge. This paper discusses a number of these issues, highlighting the need for
some new thinking and knowledge capture by systems ergonomics professionals. Among these are
ethical issues, job content and skills issues.
Towards the end, there is a summary of knowledge extensions considered necessary in order that
systems ergonomists can be fully effective in this new environment, together with suggestions for the
means to acquire and disseminate the knowledge extensions
The identification of knowledge gaps in the technologies of cyber-physical systems with recommendations for closing these gaps
The paper reports some training, education, and operational findings from an EU Horizon 2020 project that included the production of technology roadâmaps for the domain of cyberâphysical systems (CPS). The project reviewed Deliverables from 72 CPS projects, all within Framework Programme 7 and Horizon 2020, including 18 from the ARTEMIS and ECSEL subprograms. This analysis led to the production of a âKnowledge Mapâ containing 75 technologies identified within the 72 projects as nodes in this map, connected by interoperability links. Filtering this map for each node, in turn, has led, in combination with other parts of the project, to some 48 recommendations for future focus and funding of developments in these technologies to assist in the rapid adoption of CPS in all domains. While the focus has been limited to European Union research and innovation, it is believed that the recommendations are transferable to other regions of the world
Evaluating the effects of culture on military operations
Evaluating the effects of culture on military operation
Effective and efficient preparation for the unforeseeable
This paper hypothesizes that a System-of-Systems (SoS) that is not fit-for-purpose is
so because it cannot implement the correct, timely and complete transfers of Material, Energy
and/or Information (MEI) between its constituents and with its external environment that are
necessary to achieve a particular result. This research addresses the problem of maintaining a
SoS fit-for-purpose after unpredictable changes in operation, composition or external factors
by creating a method, implemented as an engineering process and supported by an analysis
technique to enhance the affordance {âFeatures that provide the potential for interaction by
âAffording the ability to do somethingâ [1]} of SoS constituents for MEI transfer and reveal
potential undesirable transfers