Probabilities of regaining some upper limb capacity at 6 months post-stroke in patients who initially did not show finger extension.

<p>Probabilities of regaining some upper limb capacity at 6 months post-stroke in patients who initially did not show finger extension.</p

Candidate baseline determinants associated with regaining some upper limb capacity at 6 months post-stroke.

<p>Candidate baseline determinants associated with regaining some upper limb capacity at 6 months post-stroke.</p

Kaplan-Meier cumulative ‘event’ curve for recovery of VFE in the group of patients who regain some upper limb capacity at 6 months post-stroke (N = 45).

<p>The numbers represent the number of patients with VFE at each time point (Fugl-Meyer Assessment hand sub item FE≥1).</p

Kaplan-Meier cumulative ‘event’ curve for recovery of VFE (N = 100).

<p>The numbers represent the number of patients with VFE at each time point (Fugl-Meyer Assessment hand sub item FE≥1). Three patients were lost to follow-up.</p

Patient characteristics.

<p>Patient characteristics.</p

Multilevel unstandardized regression coefficients, confidence intervals (CI) and level of significance for the association between clinical severity and time-dependent recovery of ipsilesional and contralesional omissions on the letter cancellation test during the first 26 weeks post-stroke, corrected for trial (N = 90).

<p>Multilevel unstandardized regression coefficients, confidence intervals (CI) and level of significance for the association between clinical severity and time-dependent recovery of ipsilesional and contralesional omissions on the letter cancellation test during the first 26 weeks post-stroke, corrected for trial (N = 90).</p

Multilevel unstandardized regression coefficients, confidence intervals (CI) and level of significance for the association between clinical severity and time-dependent recovery of ipsilesional and contralesional omissions on the letter cancellation test during the first 26 weeks post-stroke, corrected for trial (N = 90).

<p>Multilevel unstandardized regression coefficients, confidence intervals (CI) and level of significance for the association between clinical severity and time-dependent recovery of ipsilesional and contralesional omissions on the letter cancellation test during the first 26 weeks post-stroke, corrected for trial (N = 90).</p

Proportional recovery of the lower extremity: Predicted maximum potential recovery (FMA-LE_max−FMA-LE_initial) versus observed ΔFMA-LE.

<p>◻ subgroup of fitters (N = 175; blue), ○ subgroup of non-fitters (N = 27; red). For the fitters, R² of the FMA-LE_max for ΔFMA-LE was 76.8%, and the regression line y = 0.64 (95%CI 0.59–0.69) x– 0.24 (95%CI -1.15–0.66). Note that the two data points at the top right corner were also identified as a subgroup in the hierarchical cluster analysis. However, they were added to the ‘fitter’ group because their ΔFMA-LE_observed was almost identical with the predicted maximum potential recovery. Also, note that there were 15 patients who scored 1 to 3 points lower on the FMA-LE at 6 months, in comparison to the baseline measurement. See further explanation in text. CI, Confidence Interval; FMA, Fugl-Meyer Assessment; LE, Lower Extremity.</p

Demographical and stroke characteristics of patients with VSN, per group at baseline (TACI versus non-TACI).

<p>Demographical and stroke characteristics of patients with VSN, per group at baseline (TACI versus non-TACI).</p

The median number of omissions (and IQR), per side (ipsilesional versus contralesional), per week, split for group (TACI versus non-TACI).

<p>The median number of omissions (and IQR), per side (ipsilesional versus contralesional), per week, split for group (TACI versus non-TACI).</p