CCC meets ICU: Redefining the role of critical care of cancer patients

<p>Abstract</p> <p>Background</p> <p>Currently the majority of cancer patients are considered ineligible for intensive care treatment and oncologists are struggling to get their patients admitted to intensive care units. Critical care and oncology are frequently two separate worlds that communicate rarely and thus do not share novel developments in their fields. However, cancer medicine is rapidly improving and cancer is eventually becoming a chronic disease. Oncology is therefore characterized by a growing number of older and medically unfit patients that receive numerous novel drug classes with unexpected side effects.</p> <p>Discussion</p> <p>All of these changes will generate more medically challenging patients in acute distress that need to be considered for intensive care. An intense exchange between intensivists, oncologists, psychologists and palliative care specialists is warranted to communicate the developments in each field in order to improve triage and patient treatment. Here, we argue that "critical care of cancer patients" needs to be recognized as a medical subspecialty and that there is an urgent need to develop it systematically.</p> <p>Conclusion</p> <p>As prognosis of cancer improves, novel therapeutic concepts are being introduced and more and more older cancer patients receive full treatment the number of acutely ill patients is growing significantly. This development a major challenge to current concepts of intensive care and it needs to be redefined who of these patients should be treated, for how long and how intensively.</p

Hemodynamic effects of continuous positive-pressure ventilation and high-frequency jet ventilation with positive end-expiratory pressure in normal dogs

The hemodynamic effects of high-frequency jet ventilation (HFJV) at 60, 120, 240, and 480 breath/min, and conventional ventilation at 15 breath/min were compared in 6 anesthetized, paralyzed dogs, at 0, 10, and 20 cm H2O of positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP). On HFJV at the same inspired oxygen, PaCO2, and PEEP levels, hemodynamic function improved significantly. Cardiac output was higher, whereas transmural CVP and pulmonary vascular resistances were lower. The improvement was primarily related to a decrease in mean airway pressure, particularly at higher PEEP levels. When PEEP was applied, hemodynamic function improved even when mean airway pressure was maintained constant. The findings suggest that lung volume was smaller during HFJV, and/or that lung volume changes during each respiratory cycle contributed to differences in venous return and ventricular function