The relationships between HCAHPS communication and discharge satisfaction items and hospital readmissions

The Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (HCAHPS) survey has become a key metric used by organizations and patients to evaluate patient experience. Readmissions also continue to be a metric used to evaluate performance because of the added cost to both healthcare systems and patients. Both measures are also seen in programs such as Value Based Purchasing that have an effect on hospital reimbursements. Previous studies have demonstrated a relationship between patient perceptions and quality of care, and have found patients to be reliable evaluators of their care. While good communication and positive provider relationships have been related to higher satisfaction and higher rates of treatment compliance, past research has been limited to evaluating the relationship between readmissions and satisfaction at an organizational level. This retrospective, cross-sectional study will examine the relationship between communication and discharge HCAHPS questions and readmissions at 30 days, specifically at the patient level. Of the eight HCAHPS questions analyzed, higher scores on questions regarding “nurses listening” and “doctors explaining information” were linked to a decreased risk of readmission, while higher scores regarding “help after discharge” were linked to an increased risk for readmission. These results show the importance that a patient’s severity of illness and hospital procedures have on explaining HCAHPS results. This study’s seemingly paradoxical findings suggest the need to recognize potential trade-offs when reviewing HCAHPS results and using them to drive patient experience initiatives

Impact of Inpatient Unit Design Features on Overall Patient Experience and Perceived Room-Level Call Button Response

This study explores the relationship between inpatient unit design and patient experience and how spatial features and visibility impact patients’ perception of staff responsiveness. The first part of this study is a retrospective pre–post and cross-sectional study evaluating the impacts of unit design on patient experience at the unit level. This study compares patient experiences based on Press Ganey and HCAHPS surveys in two orthopedic units (existing unit in Atrium building and new unit in Tower) with differing design features at Rush University Medical Center. The chi-square test results show that when moving from the old orthopedic unit to the new unit, almost all patient survey items related to patient experience showed statistically significant improvements. The second part of this study is a room level on the new unit. The ANOVA and Pearson correlation tests revealed that the visibility measure of metric step depth had significant impacts on patients’ perception of staff’s “promptness in responding to call button” and “help with toileting”. This study confirms that inpatient unit design plays a direct role in improvement for patient experience and should be considered as an important area of focus for future development