Dialysis and pediatric acute kidney injury: choice of renal support modality

Dialytic intervention for infants and children with acute kidney injury (AKI) can take many forms. Whether patients are treated by intermittent hemodialysis, peritoneal dialysis or continuous renal replacement therapy depends on specific patient characteristics. Modality choice is also determined by a variety of factors, including provider preference, available institutional resources, dialytic goals and the specific advantages or disadvantages of each modality. Our approach to AKI has benefited from the derivation and generally accepted defining criteria put forth by the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative (ADQI) group. These are known as the risk, injury, failure, loss, and end-stage renal disease (RIFLE) criteria. A modified pediatrics RIFLE (pRIFLE) criteria has recently been validated. Common defining criteria will allow comparative investigation into therapeutic benefits of different dialytic interventions. While this is an extremely important development in our approach to AKI, several fundamental questions remain. Of these, arguably, the most important are “When and what type of dialytic modality should be used in the treatment of pediatric AKI?” This review will provide an overview of the limited data with the aim of providing objective guidelines regarding modality choice for pediatric AKI. Comparisons in terms of cost, availability, safety and target group will be reviewed

Use of mycophenolate mofetil in steroid-dependent and -resistant nephrotic syndrome

Cyclosporin (Cs-A) is an effective treatment for difficult cases of nephrotic syndrome (NS), but its use can be complicated by renal toxicity and a high incidence of relapses after withdrawal. We reviewed the charts of 10 Cs-A-dependent patients and 4 patients with steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS) not previously treated with Cs-A therapy. All patients had persistent NS, even after prior treatment with oral cyclophosphamide. Of 10 patients treated with Cs-A, 4 had surveillance renal biopsies consistent with Cs-A toxicity, and 8 of 10 had interstitial fibrosis prior to mycophenolate mofetil (MMF). Patients were treated with MMF, at 1,200 mg/m 2 per day, in an attempt to allow weaning of Cs-A and/or steroid therapy, and reduce the frequency of relapses. Overall, a significant decrease in frequency of relapses was noted after initiation of MMF therapy. In addition, 5 patients were weaned off Cs-A by 1–2 years of follow-up. One patient was weaned off Cs-A and MMF, and remained in complete remission. However, the subgroup of patients with frequently relapsing SDNS not treated with Cs-A appeared to have a reduction in the number of relapses while on MMF that did not reach statistical significance. Two patients with intractable steroid-resistant NS continued to relapse repeatedly on MMF and Cs-A therapy. We conclude that in this small, single-center, uncontrolled experience, MMF therapy in patients with Cs-A-dependent NS appears to be effective in reducing Cs-A exposure. In addition, MMF appears to significantly decrease the frequency of relapses in this patient population. Further controlled studies are warranted to better define the potential efficacy and side effects of long-term MMF therapy in this setting.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47822/1/467_2003_Article_1175.pd

Neoral induction in pediatric renal transplantation

Neoral was instituted in pediatric renal transplant patients with the hypothesis it would have more predictable kinetics than Sandimmun. However, significant questions have arisen concerning potential toxicity and dosing interval related to its rapid absorption with subsequent high initial peak. This is compounded by the fact that children appear to metabolize cyclosporine at a greater rate than adults. This combination of a rapid peak and rapid absorption may then result in lower trough levels at 12 h. We compared the trough cyclosporine levels of nine children who received Neoral with nine who received Sandimmun at the time of initial transplantation. More frequent dosing (every 8 h) was required in the Neoral population compared with the Sandimmun population for the 1st month in order to obtain comparable trough levels. Beyond the initial 4–6 weeks, trough levels were similar for Neoral and Sandimmun. Whereas 1-month creatinine levels and blood pressures were similar, the number of blood pressure medications was significantly higher in the Neoral group. At 5.5 ± 1.1 months’ followup, a single patient in the current Neoral group and in the retrospective Sandimmun group each experienced a single OKT3 allograft-treated rejection. We suggest that the area under the curve is different in Neoral than Sandimmun, and the initial dosing frequency may need to be adjusted accordingly.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/42295/1/467-12-1-2_80120002.pd

Hemodialysis in infants and small children

Hemodialysis in infants and small children requires specialized nursing staff, equipment and adequate access. The techniques, requirements and available equipment for this population are discussed.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/47834/1/467_2004_Article_BF00868283.pd

Normal growth and intravascular volume status with good metabolic control during peritoneal dialysis in infancy

Peer reviewe