A randomized prospective long-term (\u3e 1 year) clinical trial comparing the efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation to 980nm laser ablation of the great saphenous vein

Purpose To compare the short- and long-term (\u3e1 year) efficacy and safety of radiofrequency ablation (ClosureFAST™) versus endovenous laser ablation (980 nm diode laser) for the treatment of superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein. Materials and methods Two hundred patients with superficial venous insufficiency of the great saphenous vein were randomized to receive either radiofrequency ablation or endovenous laser ablation (and simultaneous adjunctive therapies for surface varicosities when appropriate). Post-treatment sonographic and clinical assessment was conducted at one week, six weeks, and six months for closure, complications, and patient satisfaction. Clinical assessment of each patient was conducted at one year and then at yearly intervals for patient satisfaction. Results Post-procedure pain (p \u3c 0.0001) and objective post-procedure bruising (p = 0.0114) were significantly lower in the radiofrequency ablation group. Improvements in venous clinical severity score were noted through six months in both groups (endovenous laser ablation 6.6 to 1; radiofrequency ablation 6.2 to 1) with no significant difference in venous clinical severity score (p = 0.4066) or measured adverse effects; 89 endovenous laser ablation and 87 radiofrequency patients were interviewed at least 12 months out with a mean long-term follow-up of 44 and 42 months (p = 0.1096), respectively. There were four treatment failures in each group, and every case was correctable with further treatment. Overall, there were no significant differences with regard to patient satisfaction between radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation (p = 0.3009). There were no cases of deep venous thrombosis in either group at any time during this study. Conclusions Radiofrequency ablation and endovenous laser ablation are highly effective and safe from both anatomic and clinical standpoints over a multi-year period and neither modality achieved superiority over the other

Atypical tracheobronchial vascular compression

Vascular compression of the tracheobronchial tree frequently presents early in infancy with significant airway compromise. For this reason, the pediatric otolaryngologist is often consulted early in the assessment of these patients. Three unusual cases of tracheobronchial vascular compression are presented. The diagnosis and management of children with tracheobronchial vascular compression is discussed, stressing the importance of synchronous airway anomalies and associated congenital cardiac anomalies. Although surgical intervention may be corrective in most cases of vascular compression, persistent tracheomalacia may necessitate tracheotomy for a prolonged period.Peer Reviewedhttp://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/2027.42/29058/1/0000091.pd

Derivation and Validation of a Model to Predict Clinically Significant Portal Hypertension Using Transient Elastography and FIB-4.

BACKGROUND: Liver biopsy and hepatic venous pressure gradient (HVPG), the gold standard for assessing advanced fibrosis (AF) and clinically significant portal hypertension (CSPH), are invasive, costly, and time-consuming. GOAL: We investigated if the combination of fibrosis index based on 4 factors (FIB-4) and liver stiffness measure (LSM) can identify AF and more importantly, CSPH. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with chronic liver disease referred for transjugular liver biopsy were analyzed retrospectively. FIB-4 and LSM were compared with liver histology for diagnosing AF. FIB-4, LSM, and platelet count were compared with HVPG for diagnosing CSPH. Optimal cutoffs for predicting CSPH were determined by grid search. A composite log-odds to predict CSPH was derived from logistic regression using LSM, FIB-4, and gender. Internal bootstrap validation and external validation were performed. RESULTS: A total of 142 patients were included in the derivation; 42.3% had AF, and 11.3% had CSPH using the current gold standards. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC) for LSM, FIB-4, and their combination to predict AF were 0.7550, 0.7049, and 0.7768, respectively. LSM, FIB-4, and platelet count predicted CSPH with AUROC 0.6818, 0.7532, and 0.7240, respectively. LSM plus FIB-4 showed the best performance in predicting CSPH with AUROC 0.8155. Based on LSM, FIB-4, and gender, a novel model-the Portal Hypertension Assessment Tool (PHAT)-was developed to predict CSPH. PHAT score ≥-2.76 predicted CSPH with sensitivity 94%, specificity 67%, positive predictive value 27%, negative predictive value 99%, and accuracy 70%. In internal and external validation, AUROCs for the model were 0.8293 and 0.7899, respectively. CONCLUSION: A model consisting of FIB-4, LSM, and gender can identify CSPH among patients with chronic liver disease

Additional file 1: of Percutaneous transhepatic vs. endoscopic retrograde biliary drainage for suspected malignant hilar obstruction: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

SPIRIT 2013 Checklist: recommended items to address in a clinical trial protocol and related documents. (DOC 122 kb