Impact of tofacitinib on patient outcomes in rheumatoid arthritis: review of clinical studies

Rheumatoid arthritis is a chronic, progressive autoimmune disease associated with inflammation and destruction of joints and systemic effects, which result in significant impact on patient\u27s quality of life and function. Tofacitinib was approved for the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis in the USA in 2012 and subsequently in other countries, but not by the European Medicines Agency. The goal of this review was to evaluate the impact of tofacitinib on patient-reported and patient-specific outcomes from prior clinical studies, focusing on quality of life, functionality, pain, global disease assessment, major adverse consequences, and withdrawals. A total of 13 reports representing 11 clinical studies on tofacitinib in rheumatoid arthritis were identified through PubMed and reference lists in meta-analyses and other reviews. Data on improvements in patient-driven composite tools to measure disease activity in rheumatoid arthritis, such as the Health Assessment Questionnaire, served as a major outcome evaluated in this review and were extracted from each study. Additional data extracted from those clinical studies included patient assessment of pain (using a 0–100 mm visual analog scale), patient global assessment of disease (using a 0–100 mm visual analog scale), patient withdrawals, withdrawals due to adverse effects or lack of effect, and risk of serious adverse effects, serious infections, and deaths. Tofacitinib 5 mg bid appears to have a favorable impact on patient outcomes related to efficacy and safety when compared with baseline values and with comparator disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and placebo. Improvements were seen in the composite and individual measures of disease activity. Serious adverse effects, other adverse consequences, overall withdrawals, and withdrawals due to adverse effects and lack of efficacy are similar or more favorable for tofacitinib versus comparator disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs and placebo. At this point, tofacitinib appears to have an important role in the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis through improvement in these patient outcomes. However, it may require years of additional clinical studies and postmarketing surveillance to fully characterize the benefit-to-risk ratio of tofacitinib in a larger and diverse patient population

Factor IX Expression within the Normal Range Prevents Spontaneous Bleeds Requiring Treatment Following FLT180a Gene Therapy in Patients with Severe Hemophilia B: Long-Term Follow- up Study of the B-Amaze Program

Introduction: FLT180a (verbrinacogene setparvovec) is an investigational, liver-directed AAV gene therapy for the treatment of patients with hemophilia B (HB). FLT180a consists of a novel, potent, engineered capsid (AAVS3) containing an expression cassette encoding a Factor IX (FIX) gain-of-function protein variant ('Padua'; FIX-R338L). The B-AMAZE study was designed to identify a dose of FLT180a that maintains FIX activity within the normal range (50-150%) and thereby protect patients with severe HB from spontaneous and traumatic bleeds. Methods: B-AMAZE was a multicentre, open-label Phase 1/2 clinical trial (NCT03369444; sponsored by UCL) that evaluated FLT180a dose levels using an escalating/descending adaptive design in patients with severe (FIX activity <1%) or moderately severe (FIX activity 1-2%) HB who were negative for AAVS3 neutralizing antibodies. A novel regimen of prophylactic corticosteroids with/without tacrolimus was implemented to mitigate the impact of vector-related transaminitis on FIX expression. Patients who completed the 26-week B-AMAZE study were eligible for the ongoing long-term follow-up study (NCT03641703; sponsored by Freeline). Results: Ten HB patients received a single dose of FLT180a. Four FLT180a doses ranging from 3.84e11 vg/kg to 1.28e12 vg/kg were assessed. As of the data cut-off date, all patients have been followed for ≥16 months. FLT180a demonstrated a favorable safety profile, without evidence of inhibitors against FIX, infusion-related or allergic reactions. The most common treatment-related adverse event was transient elevation in alanine aminotransferase. An event of AV fistula thrombosis occurred in a 67-year-old patient who received the highest dose of 1.28e12 vg/kg (total dose of 1.15e14 vg) and had supranormal FIX levels; this patient was treated with anticoagulants. While these FIX levels demonstrate the potency of our proprietary AAVS3 capsid, this dose will not be used in future hemophilia studies. At Week 26 after FLT180a administration, a dose-response relationship was observed with mean FIX activity of 45.0%, 35.5%, 141.5%, and 175.5% for 3.84e11, 6.4e11, 8.32e11, and 1.28e12 vg/kg doses, respectively (Table); FIX activity levels ≥50% were achieved in 7 of 8 patients treated with the three highest doses. One patient (Patient 4) who received 6.4e11 vg/kg lost transgene expression early due to transaminitis and resumed routine factor prophylaxis. The 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort received an extended immune management regimen (9-18 weeks) with prophylactic tacrolimus in addition to prednisolone to prevent breakthrough vector-related transaminitis. However, after cessation of the immune management regimen, transaminitis with concomitant reductions in FIX activity was observed in all patients in the 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort. The combination of prophylactic tacrolimus and prednisolone appeared to have suppressed immune-mediated transaminitis while administered, but recurrence of transaminitis developed soon after cessation. This unique and previously unreported observation suggests that the longer-duration prophylactic immune management regimen may have prevented tolerization to the vector because this was not observed in earlier cohorts where a brief course of tacrolimus was given reactively for breakthrough transaminitis. All patients (including the 8.32e11 vg/kg cohort) have achieved steady state. Patients in the earliest cohort who received the lowest dose (3.84e11 vg/kg) have shown stable FIX activity for >3 years. There were no spontaneous bleeds that required FIX supplementation in patients who maintained FIX activity above 50%; Patient 4 in the 6.4e11 vg/kg cohort experienced two bleeds (cause unknown) after he lost transgene expression, which were treated with exogenous FIX. One patient received exogenous FIX for treatment of a traumatic bleed, but his FIX activity level was 57% at the time of the event. Additional efficacy and safety results with >3.5 years of follow-up will be presented. Conclusions: B-AMAZE is the first HB gene therapy study to achieve normal levels of FIX activity using relatively low vector doses. Results suggest that a dose of 7.7e11 vg/kg, coupled with a short course of prophylactic immune management, has the potential to achieve durable FIX activity in the normal range (50-150%) and thereby prevent spontaneous bleeds and normalize hemostasis in the event of traumatic bleeds

Dense molecular gas in quasar host galaxies: a search for HCN emission from BR B1202-0725 at z=4.695

We report on the results of a search using the VLA for redshifted HCN(1-0) emission from the host galaxy of BR B1202-0725, an optically luminous quasar at z=4.695. The host galaxy emits strongly in the rest-frame far-infrared, and shows characteristics very similar to that of more local, ultraluminous infrared galaxies, in which a significant fraction of the far-infrared emission is powered by star formation. We find a 3-sigma upper limit to the HCN(1-0) emission of 4.9 x 10^10 K kms^-1 pc^2, assuming a lambda-cosmology. This limit is consistent with correlations derived from measurements of the HCN, CO, and far-infrared emission for a sample of more local galaxies, including starbursts (Solomon et al, 1992a)

The Effects of Environmental Sustainability Labels on Selection, Purchase, and Consumption of Food and Drink Products: A Systematic Review

This review assessed the effects of environmental labels on consumers’ demand for more sustainable food products. Six electronic databases were searched for experimental studies of ecolabels and food choices. We followed standard Cochrane methods and results were synthesized using vote counting. Fifty-six studies (N = 42,768 participants, 76 interventions) were included. Outcomes comprised selection (n = 14), purchase (n = 40) and consumption (n = 2). The ecolabel was presented as text (n = 36), logo (n = 13) or combination (n = 27). Message types included: organic (n = 25), environmentally sustainable (n = 27), greenhouse gas emissions (n = 17), and assorted “other” message types (n = 7). Ecolabels were tested in actual (n = 15) and hypothetical (n = 41) environments. Thirty-nine studies received an unclear or high RoB rating. Sixty comparisons favored the intervention and 16 favored control. Ecolabeling with a variety of messages and formats was associated with the selection and purchase of more sustainable food products

Screening and brief intervention for obesity in primary care: a parallel, two-arm, randomised trial

Background Obesity is a common cause of non-communicable disease. Guidelines recommend that physicians screen and offer brief advice to motivate weight loss through referral to behavioural weight loss programmes. However, physicians rarely intervene and no trials have been done on the subject. We did this trial to establish whether physician brief intervention is acceptable and effective for reducing bodyweight in patients with obesity. Methods In this parallel, two-arm, randomised trial, patients who consulted 137 primary care physicians in England were screened for obesity. Individuals could be enrolled if they were aged at least 18 years, had a body-mass index of at least 30 kg/m² (or at least 25 kg/m² if of Asian ethnicity), and had a raised body fat percentage. At the end of the consultation, the physician randomly assigned participants (1:1) to one of two 30 s interventions. Randomisation was done via preprepared randomisation cards labelled with a code representing the allocation, which were placed in opaque sealed envelopes and given to physicians to open at the time of treatment assignment. In the active intervention, the physician offered referral to a weight management group (12 sessions of 1 h each, once per week) and, if the referral was accepted, the physician ensured the patient made an appointment and offered follow-up. In the control intervention, the physician advised the patient that their health would benefit from weight loss. The primary outcome was weight change at 12 months in the intention-to-treat population, which was assessed blinded to treatment allocation. We also assessed asked patients’ about their feelings on discussing their weight when they have visited their general practitioner for other reasons. Given the nature of the intervention, we did not anticipate any adverse events in the usual sense, so safety outcomes were not assessed. This trial is registered with the ISRCTN Registry, number ISRCTN26563137. Findings Between June 4, 2013, and Dec 23, 2014, we screened 8403 patients, of whom 2728 (32%) were obese. Of these obese patients, 2256 (83%) agreed to participate and 1882 were eligible, enrolled, and included in the intention-to-treat analysis, with 940 individuals in the support group and 942 individuals in the advice group. 722 (77%) individuals assigned to the support intervention agreed to attend the weight management group and 379 (40%) of these individuals attended, compared with 82 (9%) participants who were allocated the advice intervention. In the entire study population, mean weight change at 12 months was 2·43 kg with the support intervention and 1·04 kg with the advice intervention, giving an adjusted difference of 1·43 kg (95% CI 0·89–1·97). The reactions of the patients to the general practitioners’ brief interventions did not differ significantly between the study groups in terms of appropriateness (adjusted odds ratio 0·89, 95% CI 0·75–1·07, p=0·21) or helpfulness (1·05, 0·89–1·26, p=0·54); overall, four ( Interpretation A behaviourally-informed, very brief, physician-delivered opportunistic intervention is acceptable to patients and an effective way to reduce population mean weight.</p

Evaluation of a text supported weight maintenance programme ‘Lighten Up Plus’ following a weight reduction programme: randomised controlled trial

Background Many overweight people find it difficult to maintain weight loss after attending a weight reduction programme. Self-weighing and telephone support are known to be useful methods for self-monitoring for weight loss. We examined the effectiveness of an SMS-text messaging based weight maintenance programme to encourage regular self-weighing in adults who had completed a 12 week commercial weight loss programme. Methods Randomised controlled trial of 380 obese or overweight men and women. The intervention group (n=190) received a single maintenance support phone call and SMS-text based weight maintenance messages over 12 weeks to encourage regular self-weighing after completing their weight loss programme. The primary outcome was change in weight at nine months follow up. Results Our sample (N=380) had a mean age of 47.4 years (SD 13.4), mean baseline weight and BMI of 93.1kg (16.1) and 34.4 kg/m2 (5.0) respectively, as well as majority female (87.3%) and White British (80.0%). Using intention to treat analysis both groups regained weight at nine months follow up; the intervention group regained an average of 1.36 kg while the control group regained 1.81 kg. Adjusting for covariates resulted in a mean difference of 0.45 kg (95% CI -0.78, 1.67) favouring the intervention group at nine month follow up. Conclusions We found no evidence that an SMS based weight maintenance intervention encouraging adults to weigh themselves weekly prevented weight regain at three or nine months after completing a commercial weight loss programme. <br/

The eClinical Care Pathway Framework: A novel structure for creation of online complex clinical care pathways and its application in the management of sexually transmitted infections.

Despite considerable international eHealth impetus, there is no guidance on the development of online clinical care pathways. Advances in diagnostics now enable self-testing with home diagnosis, to which comprehensive online clinical care could be linked, facilitating completely self-directed, remote care. We describe a new framework for developing complex online clinical care pathways and its application to clinical management of people with genital chlamydia infection, the commonest sexually transmitted infection (STI) in England.Using the existing evidence-base, guidelines and examples from contemporary clinical practice, we developed the eClinical Care Pathway Framework, a nine-step iterative process. Step 1: define the aims of the online pathway; Step 2: define the functional units; Step 3: draft the clinical consultation; Step 4: expert review; Step 5: cognitive testing; Step 6: user-centred interface testing; Step 7: specification development; Step 8: software testing, usability testing and further comprehension testing; Step 9: piloting. We then applied the Framework to create a chlamydia online clinical care pathway (Online Chlamydia Pathway).Use of the Framework elucidated content and structure of the care pathway and identified the need for significant changes in sequences of care (Traditional: history, diagnosis, information versus Online: diagnosis, information, history) and prescribing safety assessment. The Framework met the needs of complex STI management and enabled development of a multi-faceted, fully-automated consultation.The Framework provides a comprehensive structure on which complex online care pathways such as those needed for STI management, which involve clinical services, public health surveillance functions and third party (sexual partner) management, can be developed to meet national clinical and public health standards. The Online Chlamydia Pathway's standardised method of collecting data on demographics and sexual behaviour, with potential for interoperability with surveillance systems, could be a powerful tool for public health and clinical management.UKCRC Translational Infection Research (TIR) Initiative supported by the Medical Research Council, eSTI2 Consortium (Grant Number G0901608)