13 research outputs found

    Network measures between SZ at high load and HC at medium load.

    No full text
    <p>Green dots above indicate significant group difference (<i>p</i><0.05, FDR corrected) and pink dots above indicate marginally group difference (<i>p</i><0.1, FDR corrected) between HC and SZ at that observation.</p

    Scatter Plots of averaged clustering coefficients and local efficiency against RT at medium load.

    No full text
    <p>Scatter plots with trend lines showing averaged <i>C<sub>net</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>local,net</sub></i> as function of reaction time in all subjects and each group. Significant negative correlation (<i>p</i><0.05) was found between reaction time and averaged <i>C<sub>net</sub></i> and <i>E<sub>local,net</sub></i> for all subjects (green line).</p

    Group comparison on network measures at medium load.

    No full text
    <p>Network measures on individual observations as a function of degree between groups on WM load level 3. Green dots above indicate significant group difference (<i>p</i><0.05, FDR corrected) and pink dots above indicate marginally group difference (<i>p</i><0.1, FDR corrected) between HC and SZ at that observation.</p

    Averaged network measures changes across three load levels in HC and SZ.

    No full text
    <p>Solid lines between WM load levels indicate significant increases/decreases (<i>p</i><0.05), and dotted lines indicate no significant changes when WM load levels increases.</p

    The SIRP timing and design.

    No full text
    <p>Top: Timing and contents of each Prompt-Encode-Probe block for each WM load level. Bottom: A sample run combining six blocks at different WM load levels in pseudo-random order.</p
    corecore