4 research outputs found

    Can TDDFT Describe Excited Electronic States of Naphthol Photoacids? A Closer Look with EOM-CCSD

    No full text
    The <sup>1</sup>L<sub>b</sub> and <sup>1</sup>L<sub>a</sub> excited states of naphthols are characterized by using time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT), configuration interaction with singles (CIS), and equation-of-motion coupled cluster singles and doubles (EOM-CCSD) methods. TDDFT fails dramatically at predicting the energy and ordering of the <sup>1</sup>L<sub>a</sub> and <sup>1</sup>L<sub>b</sub> excited states as observed experimentally, while EOM-CCSD accurately predicts the excited states as characterized by natural transition orbital analysis. The limitations of TDDFT are attributed to the absence of correlation from doubly excited configurations as well as the inconsistent description of excited electronic states of naphthol photoacids revealed by excitation analysis based on the one-electron transition density matrix

    Toward Understanding the Redox Properties of Model Chromophores from the Green Fluorescent Protein Family: An Interplay between Conjugation, Resonance Stabilization, and Solvent Effects

    No full text
    The redox properties of model chromophores from the green fluorescent protein family are characterized computationally using density functional theory with a long-range corrected functional, the equation-of-motion coupled-cluster method, and implicit solvation models. The analysis of electron-donating abilities of the chromophores reveals an intricate interplay between the size of the chromophore, conjugation, resonance stabilization, presence of heteroatoms, and solvent effects. Our best estimates of the gas-phase vertical/adiabatic detachment energies of the deprotonated (i.e., anionic) model red, green, and blue chromophores are 3.27/3.15, 2.79/2.67, and 2.75/2.35 eV, respectively. Vertical/adiabatic ionization energies of the respective protonated (i.e., neutral) species are 7.64/7.35, 7.38/7.15, and 7.70/7.32 eV, respectively. The standard reduction potentials (<i>E</i><sub>red</sub><sup>0</sup>) of the anionic (Chr<sup>•</sup>/Chr<sup>–</sup>) and neutral (Chr<sup>+•</sup>/Chr) model chromophores in acetonitrile are 0.34/1.40 V (red), 0.22/1.24 V (green), and −0.12/1.02 V (blue), suggesting, counterintuitively, that the red chromophore is more difficult to oxidize than the green and blue ones (in both neutral and deprotonated forms). The respective redox potentials in water follow a similar trend but are more positive than the acetonitrile values

    Phenothiazine Radical Cation Excited States as Super-oxidants for Energy-Demanding Reactions

    No full text
    We demonstrate that the 10-phenyl-10<i>H</i>-phenothiazine radical cation (PTZ<sup>+•</sup>) has a manifold of excited doublet states accessible using visible and near-infrared light that can serve as super-photooxidants with excited-state potentials is excess of +2.1 V vs SCE to power energy demanding oxidation reactions. Photoexcitation of PTZ<sup>+•</sup> in CH<sub>3</sub>CN with a 517 nm laser pulse populates a D<sub>n</sub> electronically excited doublet state that decays first to the unrelaxed lowest electronic excited state, D<sub>1</sub>′ (τ < 0.3 ps), followed by relaxation to D<sub>1</sub> (τ = 10.9 ± 0.4 ps), which finally decays to D<sub>0</sub> (τ = 32.3 ± 0.8 ps). D<sub>1</sub>′ can also be populated directly using a lower energy 900 nm laser pulse, which results in a longer D<sub>1</sub>′→D<sub>1</sub> relaxation time (τ = 19 ± 2 ps). To probe the oxidative power of PTZ<sup>+•</sup> photoexcited doublet states, PTZ<sup>+•</sup> was covalently linked to each of three hole acceptors, perylene (Per), 9,10-diphenylanthracene (DPA), and 10-phenyl-9-anthracenecarbonitrile (ACN), which have oxidation potentials of 1.04, 1.27, and 1.6 V vs SCE, respectively. In all three cases, photoexcitation wavelength dependent ultrafast hole transfer occurs from D<sub>n</sub>, D<sub>1</sub>′, or D<sub>1</sub> of PTZ<sup>+•</sup> to Per, DPA, and ACN. The ability to take advantage of the additional oxidative power provided by the upper excited doublet states of PTZ<sup>+•</sup> will enable applications using this chromophore as a super-oxidant for energy-demanding reactions

    Extension of the Effective Fragment Potential Method to Macromolecules

    No full text
    The effective fragment potential (EFP) approach, which can be described as a nonempirical polarizable force field, affords an accurate first-principles treatment of noncovalent interactions in extended systems. EFP can also describe the effect of the environment on the electronic properties (e.g., electronic excitation energies and ionization and electron-attachment energies) of a subsystem via the QM/EFP (quantum mechanics/EFP) polarizable embedding scheme. The original formulation of the method assumes that the system can be separated, without breaking covalent bonds, into closed-shell fragments, such as solvent and solute molecules. Here, we present an extension of the EFP method to macromolecules (mEFP). Several schemes for breaking a large molecule into small fragments described by EFP are presented and benchmarked. We focus on the electronic properties of molecules embedded into a protein environment and consider ionization, electron-attachment, and excitation energies (single-point calculations only). The model systems include chromophores of green and red fluorescent proteins surrounded by several nearby amino acid residues and phenolate bound to the T4 lysozyme. All mEFP schemes show robust performance and accurately reproduce the reference full QM calculations. For further applications of mEFP, we recommend either the scheme in which the peptide is cut along the C<sub>α</sub>–C bond, giving rise to one fragment per amino acid, or the scheme with two cuts per amino acid, along the C<sub>α</sub>–C and C<sub>α</sub>–N bonds. While using these fragmentation schemes, the errors in solvatochromic shifts in electronic energy differences (excitation, ionization, electron detachment, or electron-attachment) do not exceed 0.1 eV. The largest error of QM/mEFP against QM/EFP (no fragmentation of the EFP part) is 0.06 eV (in most cases, the errors are 0.01–0.02 eV). The errors in the QM/molecular mechanics calculations with standard point charges can be as large as 0.3 eV
    corecore