Türkiye Romatizma Araştırma ve Savaş Derneği ankilozan spondilit ulusal tedavi önerileri

Objectives: To develop Turkish League Against Rheumatism (TLAR) National Recommendations for the management of ankylosing spondylitis (AS). Materials and methods: A scientific committee of 25 experts consisting of six rheumatologists and 19 physical medicine and rehabilitation specialists was formed by TLAR. Recommendations were based on the 2006 ASsessment in Ankylosing Spondylitis International Working Group(ASAS)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommendations and a systematic review of associated publications between January 2005 and September 2010. A Delphi process was used to develop the recommendations. Twelve major recommendations were constructed for the management of AS. Voting using a numerical rating scale assessed the strength of each recommendation. Results: The 12 recommendations include patient assessment, patient follow-up along with pharmacological and non-pharmacological methods. Some minor additions and changes have been made to the ASAS/EULAR recommendations. All of the recommendations had sufficient strength. Conclusion: National recommendations for the management of AS were developed based on scientific evidence and consensus expert opinion. These recommendations will be updated regularly in accordance with recent developments.Türkiye Romatizma Araştırma ve Savaş Derneği᾽nin (TRASD) Ankilozan Spondilit (AS) için ulusal tedavi önerilerinin oluşturulmasıdır. Gereç ve yöntemler: TRASD tarafından altı Romatoloji ve 19 Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon uzmanı olmak üzere toplam 25 kişiden oluşan bir bilimsel kurul oluşturuldu. Önerilerde 2006 yılında yayınlanan Ankilozan Spondilit Değerlendirme Uluslararası Çalışma Grubu (ASAS)/Romatizmaya karşı Avrupa Ligi (EULAR) önerileri ve Ocak 2005 - Eylül 2010 arasında yayınlanmış olan ilişkili yayınlar konusundaki sistematik bir inceleme temel alındı. Öneriler oluşturulurken Delphi süreci kullanıldı. Ankilozan spondilit tedavisi ile ilgili 12 ana öneri oluşturuldu. Oylama yapılarak önerilerin güçlülük düzeyi bir nümerik derecelendirme skalası ile belirlendi. Bulgular: On iki öneri hasta değerlendirilmesini, hasta takibini ve farmakolojik ve non-farmakolojik yöntemleri içermektedir. ASAS/EULAR önerilerine bazı ilaveler ve önerilerde bazı küçük değişiklikler yapılmıştır. Tüm öneriler yeterli kuvvete sahipti. Sonuç: Bilimsel kanıtlar ve uzmanların görüş birliği ile AS tedavisine yönelik ulusal öneriler oluşturulmuştur. Bu öneriler, yeni gelişmeler doğrultusunda düzenli olarak güncellenmelidi

ASSESSMENT OF SATISFACTION IN PERITONEAL EQUILIBRATION TEST: A STUDY ON THE VALIDITY AND RELIABILITY OF THE PERITONEAL EQUILIBRATION SATISFACTION SCALE

Aim: This study has been designed to develop an assessment tool to be used in determining the patients' satisfaction level with the peritoneal equilibration test (PET) procedure. Materials and Methods: The development and validation of the peritoneal equilibration test Satisfaction Scale (PETSS) was completed in two phases. Phase I focused on instrument construction and included item development and establishment of concurrent validity. Phase II included the factor analysis and psychometric assessment of the scale. In statistical evaluation of the data descriptive statistics and non-paratmetric tests were used. Results: The first version of the scale that has 3.62 Content Validity Index value was composed of 20 items. It was found that the latest version of the scale that has 14 items explained 46% of the variance. It was found that the Cronbach alfa value of this scale, which has 0.52-0.89 coefficient of item-total correlation was 0.96. Psychometric assessment of the scale revealed that except for type of the PET application, none of the demographic and clinical characteristics effect patients level of satisfaction during the PET application. Conclusion: This preliminary study showed that PETSS was a valid and reliable scale that can be used for determining satisfaction level of patients during PET application

PERSISTENCE OF ANTIBODIES AFTER SARS-COV-2 VACCINES IN HAEMODIALYSIS PATIENTS: A 6 MONTHS FOLLOW-UP

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: As COVID-19 related mortality is higher in haemodialysis patients than in the general population, proper vaccination strategies against the SARS-CoV-2 virus have utmost importance. It has been previously shown that mRNA vaccines (e.g. BNT162b2) can generate >95% of seropositivity in haemodialysis patients [1]. On the other hand, the seropositivity rate reached by the inactivated vaccine (CoronaVac®) was around 80%. In this study, we aimed to analyse the persistence of SARS-CoV-2 antibodies in haemodialysis patients for 6 months and compare it with the healthy controls. METHOD: Haemodialysis patients who were vaccinated either by BNT162b2 or CoronaVac® and who continued their regular controls for 6 months were involved in the study. Those who had previous or active SARS-CoV-2 infection, who had malignancies and those who had received immunosuppressive drugs in the previous 12 month were excluded from the study. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were measured by a commercial test after the first doses of the vaccines and at the end of the sixth month. Healthy healthcare workers who were vaccinated with similar vaccine schemes were taken as the control group. RESULTS: We recruited 85 haemodialysis patients who had received their first doses of either vaccine. Of them, 4 patients died; 3 patients were hospitalized because of COVID-19 infection during the follow-up; 9 patients missed at least one of their regular controls; and 2 patients were diagnosed with malignancy. A total of 26 patients experienced asymptomatic or mild COVID-19 infection during the follow-up period. SARS-CoV-2 IgG levels were measured at the end of the sixth month for the remaining 41 patients. Sero-positivity significantly decreased at the end of the sixth month for both vaccines, but the BNT162b2 group (n = 22) still had better seropositivity than CoronaVac® (n = 19) group (81% versus 50%; P = .03). In contrast, the seropositivity of healthy controls, even with the inactivated vaccine, was 96%. When one booster dose was applied, 90% of seropositivity could be maintained in the BNT162b2 group at the sixth month. CONCLUSION: BNT162b2 vaccine generates more persistent antibodies than inactivated vaccines in haemodialysis patients. However, when compared with the healthy controls at the end of the sixth month, antibody titers decrease more profoundly in haemodialysis patients. The booster dose can maintain the antibody levels and should be applied at least every 6 months

Homozygous factor V Leiden mutation and disseminated thrombosis in a patient with nephrotic syndrome

We report the case of a young male patient with nephrotic syndrome and multiple venous thromboses. The patient presented various aggregated thrombophilic risk factors. He was found to be homozygous for factor V Leiden mutation and his anticardiolipin antibody and homocysteine levels were high

Candidal psoas abscess following persistent pyuria in a renal transplant recipient

Candidal infections occur commonly in renal transplant recipients especially in genitourinary system. Although the epidemiology of candiduria has not been well characterized in renal transplant population, it is the most common cause of fungal infections. However, candidal psoas abscess is very rare in the literature. We report a 42-year-old male renal transplant recipient with prolonged pyuria and candiduria followed by candidal psoas abscess formation. The treatment consisted of prolonged antifungal therapy along with percutaneous drainage. However, eventually, a surgical drainage had to be performed for the successful eradication

Progression of coronary artery calcification in renal transplant recipients

Background. Cardiovascular disease is the leading cause of mortality among renal transplant recipients. In the general population, coronary artery calcification (CAC) and progression of CAC are predictors of future cardiac risk. We conducted a study to determine the progression of CAC in renal transplant recipients; we also examined the factors associated with progression and the impact of the analytic methods used to determine CAC progression

Intraperitoneal vancomycin-induced immune thrombocytopenia

Vancomycin is one of the drugs used in the peritonitis treatment regimen of peritoneal dialysis patients. Intraperitoneal route is generally preferred to provide rapid elimination of infective agents. Systemic toxicities of certain drugs after intraperitoneal administration are not very clear. The same also applies to vancomycin, although it has a considerable amount of systemic absorption after intraperitoneal administration. We herein report a case of severe thrombocytopenia, which was seen during the treatment of a peritonitis attack in a peritoneal dialysis patient. Culture studies revealed methicillin resistant staphylococci as the causative agent and the patient received intraperitoneal vancomycin per sensitivity analysis. Thrombocyte levels dropped abruptly to 3,900/mu l after 10 days of vancomycin treatment. Clinical criteria pointed out to vancomycin-related immune thrombocytopenia. Platelet levels did not recover with initial dexamethasone treatment and platelet transfusions. In the meantime, the clinical course was also complicated with intracranial bleeding. Intravenous immunoglobulin treatment was applied and dexamethasone was switched to high-dose methylprednisolone. This latter treatment generated a response and platelet levels gradually increased to normal levels. The patient could be discharged without any sequelae. There have been two previous intraperitoneal vancomycin-related immune thrombocytopenia cases in the literature. Previous cases were reviewed, and the present case was given in comparison with the previous cases