A Review of Macrolide Based Regimens for Community-Acquired Pneumonia

Community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) has significant morbidity and mortality. The Infectious Diseases Society of America/American Thoracic Society (IDSA/ATS) guidelines recommend two antimicrobial regimens for hospitalized patients with CAP, one of which includes a macrolide, and one of which does not. Both regimens have antimicrobial properties, but macrolides also possess immunomodulatory properties. Macrolides, however, may also have potential arrhythmia adverse effects. The purpose of this review is to provide an update of studies evaluating outcomes for patients with CAP treated with or without a macrolide-based regimen. Two recent randomized controlled trials conflict with each other regarding the benefit versus noninferiority of including a macrolide for the treatment for CAP. Each have their respective limitations. Most prior observational studies and meta-analyses favor using a regimen with a macrolide. We do not recommend any different treatment strategy than the current IDSA/ATS guidelines for CAP. Further studies need to occur to define the optimal treatment for CAP

Baricitinib in the Treatment of a Critical Patient with COVID-19 Pneumonia: a case report

A 72-year-old male presented to the emergency department with a chief complaint of diarrhea after having tested positive for COVID-19 two days prior. He initially had minimal respiratory complaints, but was eventually transferred to the intensive care unit for acute hypoxic respiratory failure. In addition to dexamethasone, remdesivir, and antibiotics, the patient was treated with baricitinib, a Janus kinase inhibitor that was recently granted emergency use authorization by the Food and Drug Administration for treatment of hospitalized patients with COVID-19. He had an extensive and complicated hospital course and had to be placed on mechanical ventilation, ultimately undergoing tracheostomy. After 78 days of hospitalization, his family withdrew life-sustaining measures and the patient died shortly thereafter. This case details the use of baricitinib for treatment of COVID-19 pneumonia, and demonstrates the need for additional studies regarding the efficacy of this drug

Invasive Pneumococcal Serotype 3 Disease Despite Pneumococcal Polysaccharide Vaccine-23

Pneumococcal disease has a high global morbidity and mortality. We report a case of a 63-year old female with a history of vaccination with pneumococcal polysaccharide vaccine-23 (PPSV-23) who was transferred to a tertiary care facility with fever and seizures due to an unknown etiology. The diagnosis of invasive pneumococcal disease (IPD) was based the identification of Streptococcus pneumoniae in the blood (culture; serogroup 3) and cerebrospinal fluid (antigen), and the finding of purulence under pressure at craniotomy. The pneumococcal vaccine should provide protection from IPD. The findings reported here display that IPD can overcome immunity proffered by the pneumococcal vaccine especially in patients with multiple comorbidities. This patient represents those who are under-vaccinated despite national recommendations for pneumococcal vaccination

Beta-lactam plus Macrolide vs Fluoroquinolone for Empiric Therapy of Hospitalized Patients with CAP: Results from the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study

Background Current guidelines recommend a β-lactam plus a macrolide or fluoroquinolone monotherapy as initial empiric antibiotic therapy for treatment of patients hospitalized with community-acquired pneumonia (CAP). Multiple studies have shown different results comparing the two regimens for the treatment of CAP. Our objective, in a city-wide prospective study, was to compare outcomes among hospitalized patients with CAP who received empiric treatment either with a β-lactam plus a macrolide or fluoroquinolone monotherapy. Methods This was a propensity score matched case-control study of the University of Louisville Pneumonia Study. It was a prospective population-based cohort study of all hospitalized adults with CAP. Patients were divided into two groups and propensity score matched based on empiric therapy; a β-lactam plus a macrolide compared to fluoroquinolone monotherapy. Study outcomes were time to clinical stability, length of stay, and in-hospital, 30-day and 1-year mortality. Stratified Cox proportional hazards regression was performed to analyze continuous variable differences between groups. Conditional logistic regression was performed to analyze dichotomous variable differences in mortality. Results An association was not found between the two groups for time to clinical stability (aHR: 1.06; 95% CI: 0.93-1.22), length of stay (aHR: 1.14; 95% CI: 0.99-1.32) or mortality. Conclusion The present study did not show any difference in short or long-term outcomes for hospitalized patients with CAP who were treated with either a β-lactam plus a macrolide or fluoroquinolone monotherapy. Hence, our study does not support the superiority of one treatment over other