Study 3: Mentalizing, but not systemizing, mediated the effects of both autism spectrum (A) and gender (B) on belief in a personal God (<i>N</i> = 706).

<p>*<i>p</i><.05, **<i>p</i><.01, ***<i>p</i><.001. Note. OR = odds ratio; <i>β</i> = standardized beta; b = unstandardized beta. Agreeableness, or Conscientiousness (not shown) also failed as mediators. Values in parentheses are mediated effects. <u>Autism Analysis Covariates</u>: Gender, Age, Education, Income, Religious attendance. <u>Gender Analysis Covariates</u>: Autism Spectrum, Age, Education, Income, Religious attendance.</p

Study 4: Two distinct measures of mentalizing mediated the effects of both autism spectrum (A) and gender (B) on belief in God (<i>N</i> = 452).

<p>*<i>p</i><.05, **<i>p</i><.01, ***<i>p</i><.001. Note. OR = odds ratio; <i>β</i> = standardized beta; b = unstandardized beta. Values in parentheses are mediated effects. <u>Autism Analysis Covariates</u>: Gender, Age, Education, Religious attendance, Interest in math, science, engineering. <u>Gender Analysis Covariates</u>: Autism Spectrum, Age, Education, Religious attendance, Interest in math, science, engineering.</p

Demographic and socio-economic background information in Studies 2–4.

<p>Demographic and socio-economic background information in Studies 2–4.</p

sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231158576 – Supplemental material for Thinking About God Encourages Prosociality Toward Religious Outgroups: A Cross-Cultural Investigation

Supplemental material, sj-docx-1-pss-10.1177_09567976231158576 for Thinking About God Encourages Prosociality Toward Religious Outgroups: A Cross-Cultural Investigation by Michael H. Pasek, John Michael Kelly, Crystal Shackleford, Cindel J. M. White, Allon Vishkin, Julia M. Smith, Ara Norenzayan, Azim Shariff and Jeremy Ginges in Psychological Science</p

buchtel_online_appendix – Supplemental material for A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation

<p>Supplemental material, buchtel_online_appendix for A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation by Emma E. Buchtel, Leo C. Y. Ng, Ara Norenzayan, Steven J. Heine, Jeremy C. Biesanz, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Michael Harris Bond, Qin Peng and Yanjie Su in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p

Group-level moralization of local deities appears to increase as a function of group-level material security.

<p>Note that the Hadza are missing due to difficulty with scale items and the Lovu are missing due to a lack of local deity data. This figure illustrates how aggregate, group-level patterns can be misleading for individual-level inferences. Compare this to the null effects in the Local Deity block in Fig 2 and Table D in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0193856#pone.0193856.s001" target="_blank">S1 Supporting Information</a>.</p

90% credibility intervals of mean estimates for factors predicting achieved fertility (Model 1 in Table 2).

<p>Effects to the right of zero are positive and effects to the left of zero are negative.</p

Online_Tables_for_submission_R_and_R3 – Supplemental material for A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation

<p>Supplemental material, Online_Tables_for_submission_R_and_R3 for A Sense of Obligation: Cultural Differences in the Experience of Obligation by Emma E. Buchtel, Leo C. Y. Ng, Ara Norenzayan, Steven J. Heine, Jeremy C. Biesanz, Sylvia Xiaohua Chen, Michael Harris Bond, Qin Peng and Yanjie Su in Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin</p

Mean estimates and 90% credibility intervals for the levels of moral concern, knowledge breadth, punishment, and self-reported devotional ritual frequency attributed to moralistic (<i>a</i>) and local (<i>b</i>) deities as a function of food security, years of formal education and number of children.

<p>These results hold participant sex and age constant. All values are from the results tables taken from the full models in Tables D-G in <a href="http://www.plosone.org/article/info:doi/10.1371/journal.pone.0193856#pone.0193856.s001" target="_blank">S1 Supporting Information</a>. The end points of histograms are mean estimates. We include them for easier visual comparison of relative direction and distance from zero. Narrower error bars indicate more precise estimates. Effects to the right of zero are positive and effects to the left of zero are negative. Error bar symmetry around zero indicates no reliable effect; we found no evidence supporting any of the target predictions about religion.</p

Descriptive statistics of each field site.

<p>Descriptive statistics of each field site.</p