Determinants of Return on Oil and Gas Stocks in Canada and the US: A Micro & Macro Analysis

This paper takes a look at the determinants of oil and gas sector returns for US and Canadian companies. We examine returns during the period of 2001 to 2013 using a multifactor model to determine significant return factors. Our model incorporates both macro factors as well as firm specific micro factors. We also incorporate an analysis of the effect of the financial crisis on returns. Finally we briefly examine hedging in this sector and determine through our model if firms hedge against oil and gas price fluctuations. Our results suggest that profit margin and price to book ratio are positively related to oil and gas stock’s returns, while book leverage is negatively related with stocks’ returns. Market capitalization does not have any effect on stocks’ return. In terms of macro variables, the returns are positively linked with the market return, oil price and gas price, and negatively with GDP, interest rate, Crisis and, for Canadian companies, exchange rate

Fused in Sarcoma (FUS) in DNA Repair: Tango with Poly(ADP-ribose) Polymerase 1 and Compartmentalisation of Damaged DNA

International audienceThe fused in sarcoma (FUS) protein combines prion-like properties with a multifunctional DNA/RNA-binding domain and has functions spanning the regulation of RNA metabolism, including transcription, pre-mRNA splicing, mRNA transport and translation. In addition to its roles in RNA metabolism, FUS is implicated in the maintenance of DNA integrity. In this review, we examine the participation of FUS in major DNA repair pathways, focusing on DNA repair associated with poly(ADP-ribosyl)ation events and on how the interaction of FUS with poly(ADP-ribose) may orchestrate transient compartmentalisation of DNA strand breaks. Unravelling how prion-like RNA-binding proteins control DNA repair pathways will deepen our understanding of the pathogenesis of some neurological diseases and cancer as well as provide the basis for the development of relevant innovative therapeutic technologies. This knowledge may also extend the range of applications of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors to the treatment of neurodegenerative diseases related to RNA-binding proteins in the cell, e.g., amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneratio

PARP1 Activation Controls Stress Granule Assembly after Oxidative Stress and DNA Damage

DNA damage causes PARP1 activation in the nucleus to set up the machinery responsible for the DNA damage response. Here, we report that, in contrast to cytoplasmic PARPs, the synthesis of poly(ADP-ribose) by PARP1 opposes the formation of cytoplasmic mRNA-rich granules after arsenite exposure by reducing polysome dissociation. However, when mRNA-rich granules are pre-formed, whether in the cytoplasm or nucleus, PARP1 activation positively regulates their assembly, though without additional recruitment of poly(ADP-ribose) in stress granules. In addition, PARP1 promotes the formation of TDP-43- and FUS-rich granules in the cytoplasm, two RNA-binding proteins which form neuronal cytoplasmic inclusions observed in certain neurodegenerative diseases such as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis and frontotemporal lobar degeneration. Together, the results therefore reveal a dual role of PARP1 activation which, on the one hand, prevents the early stage of stress granule assembly and, on the other hand, enables the persistence of cytoplasmic mRNA-rich granules in cells which may be detrimental in aging neurons

PARP-1 Activation Directs FUS to DNA Damage Sites to Form PARG-Reversible Compartments Enriched in Damaged DNA

International audiencePARP-1 synthesizes long poly(ADP-ribose) chains(PAR) at DNA damage sites to recruit DNA repair fac-tors. Among proteins relocated on damaged DNA,the RNA-binding protein FUS is one of the mostabundant, raising the issue about its involvement inDNA repair. Here, we reconstituted the PARP-1/PAR/DNA systemin vitroand analyzed at the sin-gle-molecule level the role of FUS. We demonstratesuccessively the dissociation of FUS from mRNA,its recruitment at DNA damage sites through its bind-ing to PAR, and the assembly of damaged DNA-richcompartments. PARG, an enzyme family that hydro-lyzes PAR, is sufficient to dissociate damaged DNA-rich compartmentsin vitroand initiates the nucleocy-toplasmic shuttling of FUS in cells. We anticipatethat, consistent with previous models, FUS facilitatesDNA repair through the transient compartmentaliza-tion of DNA damage sites. The nucleocytoplasmicshuttling of FUS after the PARG-mediated compart-ment dissociation may participate in the formationof cytoplasmic FUS aggregates

FUS fibrillation occurs through a nucleation-based process below the critical concentration required for liquid–liquid phase separation

Abstract FUS is an RNA-binding protein involved in familiar forms of ALS and FTLD that also assembles into fibrillar cytoplasmic aggregates in some neurodegenerative diseases without genetic causes. The self-adhesive prion-like domain in FUS generates reversible condensates via the liquid–liquid phase separation process (LLPS) whose maturation can lead to the formation of insoluble fibrillar aggregates in vitro, consistent with the appearance of cytoplasmic inclusions in ageing neurons. Using a single-molecule imaging approach, we reveal that FUS can assemble into nanofibrils at concentrations in the nanomolar range. These results suggest that the formation of fibrillar aggregates of FUS could occur in the cytoplasm at low concentrations of FUS, below the critical ones required to trigger the liquid-like condensate formation. Such nanofibrils may serve as seeds for the formation of pathological inclusions. Interestingly, the fibrillation of FUS at low concentrations is inhibited by its binding to mRNA or after the phosphorylation of its prion-like domain, in agreement with previous models

FUS fibrillation occurs through a nucleation-based process below the critical concentration required for liquid–liquid phase separation

Abstract FUS is an RNA-binding protein involved in familiar forms of ALS and FTLD that also assembles into fibrillar cytoplasmic aggregates in some neurodegenerative diseases without genetic causes. The self-adhesive prion-like domain in FUS generates reversible condensates via the liquid–liquid phase separation process (LLPS) whose maturation can lead to the formation of insoluble fibrillar aggregates in vitro, consistent with the appearance of cytoplasmic inclusions in ageing neurons. Using a single-molecule imaging approach, we reveal that FUS can assemble into nanofibrils at concentrations in the nanomolar range. These results suggest that the formation of fibrillar aggregates of FUS could occur in the cytoplasm at low concentrations of FUS, below the critical ones required to trigger the liquid-like condensate formation. Such nanofibrils may serve as seeds for the formation of pathological inclusions. Interestingly, the fibrillation of FUS at low concentrations is inhibited by its binding to mRNA or after the phosphorylation of its prion-like domain, in agreement with previous models

Novel group of tyrosyl-DNA-phosphodiesterase 1 inhibitors based on disaccharide nucleosides as drug prototypes for anti-cancer therapy

A new class of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1) inhibitors based on disaccharide nucleosides was identified. TDP1 plays an essential role in the resistance of cancer cells to currently used antitumour drugs based on Top1 inhibitors such as topotecan and irinotecan. The most effective inhibitors investigated in this study have IC50 values (half-maximal inhibitory concentration) in 0.4–18.5 µM range and demonstrate relatively low own cytotoxicity along with significant synergistic effect in combination with anti-cancer drug topotecan. Moreover, kinetic parameters of the enzymatic reaction and fluorescence anisotropy were measured using different types of DNA-biosensors to give a sufficient insight into the mechanism of inhibitor’s action

Usnic Acid Derivatives Inhibit DNA Repair Enzymes Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterases 1 and 2 and Act as Potential Anticancer Agents

Tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 and 2 (Tdp1 and Tdp2) are DNA repair enzymes that repair DNA damage caused by various agents, including anticancer drugs. Thus, these enzymes resist anticancer therapy and could be the reason for resistance to such widely used drugs such as topotecan and etoposide. In the present work, we found compounds capable of inhibiting both enzymes among derivatives of (−)-usnic acid. Both (+)- and (−)-enantiomers of compounds act equally effectively against Tdp1 with IC50 values in the range of 0.02–0.2 μM; only (−)-enantiomers inhibited Tdp2 with IC50 values in the range of 6–9 μM. Surprisingly, the compounds protect HEK293FT wild type cells from the cytotoxic effect of etoposide (CC50 3.0–3.9 μM in the presence of compounds and 2.4 μM the presence of DMSO) but potentiate it against Tdp2 knockout cells (CC50 1.2–1.6 μM in the presence of compounds against 2.3 μM in the presence of DMSO). We assume that the sensitizing effect of the compounds in the absence of Tdp2 is associated with the effective inhibition of Tdp1, which could take over the functions of Tdp2

A Knockout of Poly(ADP-Ribose) Polymerase 1 in a Human Cell Line: An Influence on Base Excision Repair Reactions in Cellular Extracts

Base excision repair (BER) is the predominant pathway for the removal of most forms of hydrolytic, oxidative, and alkylative DNA lesions. The precise functioning of BER is achieved via the regulation of each step by regulatory/accessory proteins, with the most important of them being poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase 1 (PARP1). PARP1′s regulatory functions extend to many cellular processes including the regulation of mRNA stability and decay. PARP1 can therefore affect BER both at the level of BER proteins and at the level of their mRNAs. Systematic data on how the PARP1 content affects the activities of key BER proteins and the levels of their mRNAs in human cells are extremely limited. In this study, a CRISPR/Cas9-based technique was used to knock out the PARP1 gene in the human HEK 293FT line. The obtained cell clones with the putative PARP1 deletion were characterized by several approaches including PCR analysis of deletions in genomic DNA, Sanger sequencing of genomic DNA, quantitative PCR analysis of PARP1 mRNA, Western blot analysis of whole-cell-extract (WCE) proteins with anti-PARP1 antibodies, and PAR synthesis in WCEs. A quantitative PCR analysis of mRNAs coding for BER-related proteins—PARP2, uracil DNA glycosylase 2, apurinic/apyrimidinic endonuclease 1, DNA polymerase β, DNA ligase III, and XRCC1—did not reveal a notable influence of the PARP1 knockout. The corresponding WCE catalytic activities evaluated in parallel did not differ significantly between the mutant and parental cell lines. No noticeable effect of poly(ADP-ribose) synthesis on the activity of the above WCE enzymes was revealed either

New Hybrid Compounds Combining Fragments of Usnic Acid and Monoterpenoids for Effective Tyrosyl-DNA Phosphodiesterase 1 Inhibition

Usnic acid (UA) is a secondary metabolite of lichens that exhibits a wide range of biological activities. Previously, we found that UA derivatives are effective inhibitors of tyrosyl-DNA phosphodiesterase 1 (TDP1). It can remove covalent complex DNA-topoisomerase 1 (TOP1) stabilized by the TOP1 inhibitor topotecan, neutralizing the effect of the drugs. TDP1 removes damage at the 3′ end of DNA caused by other anticancer agents. Thus, TDP1 is a promising therapeutic target for the development of drug combinations with topotecan, as well as other drugs for cancer treatment. Ten new UA enamino derivatives with variation in the terpene fragment and substituent of the UA backbone were synthesized and tested as TDP1 inhibitors. Four compounds, 11a-d, had IC50 values in the 0.23–0.40 μM range. Molecular modelling showed that 11a-d, with relatively short aliphatic chains, fit to the important binding domains. The intrinsic cytotoxicity of 11a-d was tested on two human cell lines. The compounds had low cytotoxicity with CC50 ≥ 60 μM for both cell lines. 11a and 11c had high inhibition efficacy and low cytotoxicity, and they enhanced topotecan’s cytotoxicity in cancerous HeLa cells but reduced it in the non-cancerous HEK293A cells. This “protective” effect from topotecan on non-cancerous cells requires further investigation