Elastic thickness evolution

North and South elastic thickness evolution (in meters) for the models that suitably fit the four constraints (elastic thickness evolution constraints and present-day volcanism in the Southern hemisphere).<div><br></div><div>Elastic thickness of the best model described in section 4.1 is given in files with 'BestModel'. Min and Max correspond to the extremum values observed among suitable models (Figure 5, shaded areas)</div><div><br><div>files with 1014 correspond to the elastic thickness evolution when considering a strain rate representative of the time scale of polar cap deposition : Figure 5b</div><div>files with 1017 correspond to the elastic thickness evolution when considering a strain rate representative of the time scale of mantle convection : Figure 5a</div><div><br></div><div>data files give the estimations of martian elastic thicknesses made by previous studies, which are compiled in Figure 2b. Each line represent one estimation and gives in order: the elastic thickness estimation, the range (minimum and maximum values), the age of this elastic thickness, the range of this age (maximaum and minimum).</div><div><div><div> </div> </div> </div></div

NUCM Monte Carlo results - dry crust and dry mantle rheology

Monte Carlo results for NUCM simulations (Figure 10b)<div>Rheology = dry mantle and dry crust, diffusion creep</div><div><br></div><div><div><b>Files:</b></div><div>Each line of the files (scores, thickness, enrichment factor and crustal radioelement content) corresponds to a model with given crustal parameters (crustal thickness in meters and enrichment factor) and the results obtained for this model.<div><br></div><div>Gaussian scores for the three constraints on elastic thickness are given in the files "score". To compute scores between 0 and 1, these scores have to be divided by the maximum of the corresponding gaussian (given in "Gaussian_maximum.csv": in order for the Noachian, the Southern polar cap and the Northern polar cap)</div><div><br></div><div>The file "MeltFormation" gives the difference in meters between the depth of the stagnant lid and the depth of melt formation in the Southern hemisphere. Models with present-day formation in the South are those where this difference is lower than 100 km.</div></div></div

present-day temperature profiles

North and South present-day temperature profiles of suitable models (Figure 11) (in kelvins). Corresponding radius are given in the files "radius" (in kilometers).<div><br><div>Files with BestModel correspond to the best model described in section 4.1. Files with Min and Max correspond to the extremum temperatures observed among suitable models.</div></div

UCM Monte Carlo results - wet crust and dry mantle rheology

Monte Carlo results for UCM simulations (Figures 6a-b-c-d, 7a and 9a). Rheology = dry mantle and wet crust, diffusion creep<div><br></div><div><b>Files:</b></div><div>Each line of the files (scores, thickness, enrichment factor and crustal radioelement content) corresponds to a model with given crustal parameters (crustal thickness in meters and enrichment factor) and the results obtained for this model.<div><br></div><div>Gaussian scores for the three constraints on elastic thickness are given in the files "score". To compute scores between 0 and 1, these scores have to be divided by the maximum of the corresponding gaussian (given in "Gaussian_maximum.csv": in order for the Noachian, the Southern polar cap and the Northern polar cap)</div><div><br></div><div>The file "MeltFormation" gives the difference in meters between the depth of the stagnant lid and the depth of melt formation in the Southern hemisphere. Models with present-day formation in the South are those where this difference is lower than 100 km.</div></div><div><br></div><div>The percentage of radioelement contained in the Northern and Southern crusts are given in files "RadioelementContents".<br></div

NUCM Monte Carlo results - wet crust and dry mantle rheology

Monte Carlo results for NUCM simulations (Figures 6e-f-g-h and 7b). Rheology = dry mantle and wet crust, diffusion creep<div><br></div><div><div><b>Files:</b></div><div>Each line of the files (scores, thickness, enrichment factor and crustal radioelement content) corresponds to a model with given crustal parameters (crustal thickness in meters and enrichment factor) and the results obtained for this model.<div><br></div><div>Gaussian scores for the three constraints on elastic thickness are given in the files "score". To compute scores between 0 and 1, these scores have to be divided by the maximum of the corresponding gaussian (given in "Gaussian_maximum.csv": in order for the Noachian, the Southern polar cap and the Northern polar cap)</div><div><br></div><div>The file "MeltFormation" gives the difference in meters between the depth of the stagnant lid and the depth of melt formation in the Southern hemisphere. Models with present-day formation in the South are those where this difference is lower than 100 km.</div></div><div><br><div><br></div></div></div

NUCM_DryCrust_DiffusionCreep

JGR ref 2017JE005431RR <div>results for NUCM simulations when considering a dry crust and dry mantle rheology, as well as diffusion creep.</div

NUCM2 Monte Carlo results - wet crust and dry mantle rheology

Monte Carlo results for NUCM2 simulations (Figure 9b)<div>Rheology = dry mantle and wet crust, diffusion creep</div><div><br></div><div><div><b>Files:</b></div><div>Each line of the files (scores, thickness, enrichment factor and crustal radioelement content) corresponds to a model with given crustal parameters (crustal thickness in meters and enrichment factor) and the results obtained for this model.<div><br></div><div>Gaussian scores for the three constraints on elastic thickness are given in the files "score". To compute scores between 0 and 1, these scores have to be divided by the maximum of the corresponding gaussian (given in "Gaussian_maximum.csv": in order for the Noachian, the Southern polar cap and the Northern polar cap)</div><div><br></div><div>The file "MeltFormation" gives the difference in meters between the depth of the stagnant lid and the depth of melt formation in the Southern hemisphere. Models with present-day formation in the South are those where this difference is lower than 100 km.</div></div></div><div><br></div><div>The percentage of radioelement contained in the Northern and Southern crusts are given in files "RadioelementContents".</div

UCM Monte carlo results - dry crust, dry mantle rheology

<div>Rheology = dry mantle and dry crust, diffusion creep<br></div>Monte Carlo results for UCM simulations (Figure 10a). <div><br></div><div><div><b>Files:</b></div><div>Each line of the files (scores, thickness, enrichment factor and crustal radioelement content) corresponds to a model with given crustal parameters (crustal thickness in meters and enrichment factor) and the results obtained for this model.<div><br></div><div>Gaussian scores for the three constraints on elastic thickness are given in the files "score". To compute scores between 0 and 1, these scores have to be divided by the maximum of the corresponding gaussian (given in "Gaussian_maximum.csv": in order for the Noachian, the Southern polar cap and the Northern polar cap)</div><div><br></div><div>The file "MeltFormation" gives the difference in meters between the depth of the stagnant lid and the depth of melt formation in the Southern hemisphere. Models with present-day formation in the South are those where this difference is lower than 100 km.</div></div></div