34 research outputs found
Positive exposure to Muslims and perceptions of a disdainful public: A model of mediated social dissent
No full textHow Discrimination Shapes Social Identification Processes and Well-Being Among Arab Americans
No full textThe Brown Threat: Post-9/11 conflations of Latina/os and Middle Eastern Muslims in the US American imagination
No full textMuslim Americans’ Responses to Social Identity Threats: Effects of Media Representations and Experiences of Discrimination
No full textReframing the war on terror: Feminist and lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ) activism in the context of the 2006 Israeli invasion of Lebanon
No full textConstruing oppositions, demarcating a we-ness: The dramaturgy of a live TV debate on the refugee crisis
No full textFree speech versus marginalized groups: Public and newspaper responses to the Charlie Hebdo attack
No full text© 2019 NOND of AEJMC. This study explores how British and American newspapers covered the 2015 terrorist attack on Charlie Hebdo. British newspapers prioritize free speech and the protection of marginalized groups compared with American ones, but both countries differentiate Muslims from radical terrorists. Attention to news media coverage of the attack is positively related to public approval of publishing the cartoons, supporting press freedom. Implications for free speech debate over Charlie Hebdo are discussed
