21 research outputs found
Selective Intermolecular C–H Bond Activation: A Straightforward Synthetic Approach to Heteroalkyl Yttrium Complexes Containing a Bis(pyrazolyl)methyl Ligand
The
reactions of bis(pyrazolyl)methanes CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>R<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> (R = Me, <i>t</i>Bu) with Y(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(THF)<sub>2</sub> and LY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (L = amidopyridinate (Ap′), amidinate
(Amd), tridentate amidinate bearing 2-methoxyphenyl pendant in a side
arm (Amd<sup>OMe</sup>) and pentamethylcyclopentadienyl (Cp*); <i>n</i> = 0, 1) were investigated. CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub><i>t</i>Bu<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> turned
out to be inert in these reactions, while less bulky CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> easily
undergoes metalation by yttrium alkyls. The reaction of Y(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>3</sub>(THF)<sub>2</sub> with CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> regardless
of the molar ratio of the reagents affords a homoleptic tris(alkyl)
species, Y[CH(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>3</sub> (<b>1</b>). However, the reactions of equimolar
amounts of LY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> and CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> occur selectively with replacement
of a sole CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub> fragment and afford the related
heteroalkyl complexes LY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)[CH(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub>](THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (L = Ap′, <i>n</i> = 1
(<b>6</b>); Amd, <i>n</i> = 0 (<b>7</b>); Amd<sup>OMe</sup>, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>8</b>); Cp*, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>9</b>)) in good yields. The second equivalent
of CH<sub>2</sub>(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub> does not react with heteroalkyl yttrium complexes. The X-ray
studies revealed that in complexes <b>1</b> and <b>6</b>–<b>9</b> the bis(pyrazolyl)methyl ligands are bound
to the yttrium centers in a similar fashion via one covalent Y–C
and two coordination Y–N bonds. Thermal decomposition of complexes <b>6</b>–<b>9</b> (C<sub>6</sub>D<sub>6</sub>, 80 °C)
as evidenced by <sup>1</sup>H NMR spectroscopy resulted in SiMe<sub>4</sub> elimination, while no activation of the C–H bonds
of bis(pyrazolyl)methyl ligands was detected. When <b>6</b> was
treated with an equimolar amount of PhSiH<sub>3</sub>, only the YCH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub> bond selectively underwent σ-bond metathesis
and a dimeric yttrium alkyl-hydrido complex, {Ap′Y[CH(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub>](μ<sup>2</sup>-H)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>10</b>), was formed. The reaction
of <b>6</b> with 2,6-diisopropylaniline also resulted in the
selective protonation of the YCH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub> bond
and cleanly afforded alkyl-anilido complex Ap′Y(NHC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub><i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)[CH(C<sub>3</sub>HN<sub>2</sub>Me<sub>2</sub>-3,5)<sub>2</sub>](THF)
(<b>11</b>). The ternary catalytic systems <b>6</b>–<b>9</b>/borate/Al<i>i</i>Bu<sub>3</sub> (borate = [HNMe<sub>2</sub>Ph][B(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>4</sub>], [Ph<sub>3</sub>C][B(C<sub>6</sub>F<sub>5</sub>)<sub>4</sub>]; [Ln]:[borate]:[Al<i>i</i>Bu<sub>3</sub>] = 1:1:10) demonstrated moderate catalytic
activity in isoprene polymerization; they allow quantitative conversion
into polymer of up to 1000 equiv of monomer in 2–4 h. The best
activity and 1,4-cis selectivity (83.5%) were demonstrated by amidinato
complex <b>8</b>
Reversible Switching of Coordination Mode of ansa bis(Amidinate) Ligand in Ytterbium Complexes Driven by Oxidation State of the Metal Atom
Reaction
of bisamidine C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>-Bu)NH(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) and [(Me<sub>3</sub>Si)<sub>2</sub>N]<sub>2</sub>Yb(THF)<sub>2</sub> (THF = tetrahydrofuran) (toluene; room
temperature) in a 1:1 molar ratio afforded a bis(amidinate) Yb<sup>II</sup> complex [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>-Bu)N(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Yb(THF)
(<b>2</b>) in 65% yield. Complex <b>2</b> features unusual
κ<sup>1</sup>amide, η<sup>6</sup>-arene coordination of
both amidinate fragments to the ytterbium ion, resulting in the formation
of a bent bis(arene) structure. Oxidation of <b>2</b> by Ph<sub>3</sub>SnCl (1:1 molar ratio) or (PhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub> (1:0.5)
leads to the Yb<sup>III</sup> species [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>-Bu)N(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]YbCl(1,2-dimethoxyethane)
(<b>3</b>) and {[C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>-Bu)N(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Yb(μ-SCH<sub>2</sub>Ph)}<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>), performing “classic” κ<sup>2</sup>N,N′-chelating
coordination mode of ansa bis(amidinate) ligand. By the
reduction of <b>3</b> with equimolar amount of sodium naphthalide
[C<sub>10</sub>H<sub>8</sub><sup>•–</sup>][Na<sup>+</sup>] in THF, complex <b>2</b> can be recovered and restored to
a bent bis(arene) structure. Complex <b>3</b> was also synthesized
by the salt metathesis reaction of equimolar amounts of YbCl<sub>3</sub> and the dilithium derivative of <b>1</b> in THF
Reactions of Bis(alkyl)yttrium Complexes Supported by Bulky N,N Ligands with 2,6-Diisopropylaniline and Phenylacetylene
The reactions of bis(trimethylsilylmethyl)yttrium complexes
supported by bulky amidopyridinate (Ap) and amidinate (Amd) ligands
(LY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub>: L = Ap, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>1</b>); L = Amd, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>2</b>)) with 2,6-diisopropylaniline and
phenylacetylene were performed. The reaction of <b>1</b> with
an equimolar amount of 2,6-diisopropylaniline occurs with TMS elimination
and affords an yttrium alkyl anilido species which was isolated as
a DME adduct, ApY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)(NH-2,6-<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)(DME) (<b>3</b>).
The protonolysis of <b>3</b> with phenylacetylene results in
the alkynyl anilido derivative ApY(CCPh)(NH-2,6-<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)(DME) (<b>6</b>).
The treatment of complexes <b>3</b> and <b>6</b> with
2,2′-bipy leads to the formation of the bis(anilido) derivative
ApY(NH-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(bipy) (<b>5</b>). The formation of a dimeric
complex containing two ApY fragments linked by two μ<sub>2</sub>-alkynyl groups and a μ-η<sup>2</sup>:η<sup>2</sup>-butatrienediyl fragment, [{AmdY(μ<sub>2</sub>-CCPh)}<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-η<sup>2</sup>:η<sup>2</sup>-PhCCCCPh)] (<b>7</b>), was observed in the reaction of <b>2</b> with 2 equiv of phenylacetylene
Reactions of Bis(alkyl)yttrium Complexes Supported by Bulky N,N Ligands with 2,6-Diisopropylaniline and Phenylacetylene
The reactions of bis(trimethylsilylmethyl)yttrium complexes
supported by bulky amidopyridinate (Ap) and amidinate (Amd) ligands
(LY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub>: L = Ap, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>1</b>); L = Amd, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>2</b>)) with 2,6-diisopropylaniline and
phenylacetylene were performed. The reaction of <b>1</b> with
an equimolar amount of 2,6-diisopropylaniline occurs with TMS elimination
and affords an yttrium alkyl anilido species which was isolated as
a DME adduct, ApY(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)(NH-2,6-<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)(DME) (<b>3</b>).
The protonolysis of <b>3</b> with phenylacetylene results in
the alkynyl anilido derivative ApY(CCPh)(NH-2,6-<sup>i</sup>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)(DME) (<b>6</b>).
The treatment of complexes <b>3</b> and <b>6</b> with
2,2′-bipy leads to the formation of the bis(anilido) derivative
ApY(NH-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(bipy) (<b>5</b>). The formation of a dimeric
complex containing two ApY fragments linked by two μ<sub>2</sub>-alkynyl groups and a μ-η<sup>2</sup>:η<sup>2</sup>-butatrienediyl fragment, [{AmdY(μ<sub>2</sub>-CCPh)}<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-η<sup>2</sup>:η<sup>2</sup>-PhCCCCPh)] (<b>7</b>), was observed in the reaction of <b>2</b> with 2 equiv of phenylacetylene
Amido Ln(II) Complexes Coordinated by Bi- and Tridentate Amidinate Ligands: Nonconventional Coordination Modes of Amidinate Ligands and Catalytic Activity in Intermolecular Hydrophosphination of Styrenes and Tolane
Heteroleptic Ln(II) and Ca(II) amides
[<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)<sub>2</sub>]MN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)
(M = Yb (<b>1Yb</b>),
Ca (<b>1Ca</b>)), [2-MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)]LnN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF) (Ln = Sm (<b>2Sm</b>), Yb (<b>2Yb</b>)), and [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>P(O)C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-Me<sub>2</sub>-2,6)]YbN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)
(<b>3Yb</b>) coordinated by bi- and tridentate amidinate ligands
were obtained by the amine elimination reactions of M[N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>](THF)<sub>2</sub> (M = Yb, Sm, Ca) with parent amidines
in good yields. Complex [<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)<sub>2</sub>]SmN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> can be obtained only by a salt metathesis reaction
of [<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]SmI(THF)<sub>2</sub> with NaN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>. Unlike <b>1Yb</b> and <b>1Ca</b> in <b>1Sm</b> the amidinate ligand is coordinated to metal
ion in κ<sup>1</sup>-amido:η<sup>6</sup>-arene fashion
preventing THF coordination. The derivatives of tridentate amidinate
ligands bearing pendant donor 2-MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> or 2-Ph<sub>2</sub>P(O)C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N groups feature nonconventional
κ<sup>1</sup>-N,κ<sup>2</sup>-O,η<sup>6</sup>-arene
coordination mode. Complexes <b>1Ca</b>, <b>1Sm</b>, <b>1Yb</b>, <b>2Sm</b>, <b>2Yb</b>, and <b>3Yb</b> proved to be efficient catalysts for styrene hydrophosphination
with PhPH<sub>2</sub> and Ph<sub>2</sub>PH. In styrene hydrophosphination
with PhPH<sub>2</sub> all the catalysts perform excellent chemoselectivity
and afford a monoaddition productsecondary phosphine (PhCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>)PhPH. Moreover, all the catalysts perform hydrophosphination
reactions regioselectively with exclusive formation of the <i>anti-</i>Markovnikov addition product. Within the series of
complexes coordinated by the same amidinate ligand catalytic activity
decreases in the following order <b>1Ca</b> ≥ <b>1Sm</b>><b>1Yb</b>. The turnover frequencies were in the range
of
TOF ≈ 0.3–0.7 h<sup>–1</sup>. However, application
of tridentate amidinate ligand allowed one to increase catalytic activity
significantly: for <b>2Sm</b> TOF was found to be 8.3 h<sup>–1</sup>. For the addition of PhPH<sub>2</sub> to para-substituted
styrenes catalyzed by <b>2Sm</b> it was found that electron-withdrawing
substituents (Cl, F) do not affect the reaction rate while electron-donating
groups (<i>t</i>Bu, OMe) noticeably slow down the reaction
Chloro and Alkyl Rare-Earth Complexes Supported by <i>ansa</i>-Bis(amidinate) Ligands with a Rigid <i>o</i>‑Phenylene Linker. Ligand Steric Bulk: A Means of Stabilization or Destabilization?
<i>ansa</i>-Bis(amidinate) ligands with a rigid <i>o</i>-phenylene linker, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)H}<sub>2</sub> (R = Me (<b>1</b>), <i>i</i>Pr (<b>2</b>)), were successfully employed for the synthesis of rare-earth chloro
and alkyl species. The reaction of dilithium derivatives of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> with LnCl<sub>3</sub> (Ln = Y, Lu) afforded
the monomeric bis(amidinate) chloro lanthanide complexes [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Y(THF)(μ-Cl)<sub>2</sub>Li(THF)<sub>2</sub> (R = Me (<b>3</b>), <i>i</i>Pr
(<b>5</b>)) and [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]LuCl(THF)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>). Bis(amidinate) ligands
in complexes <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> are coordinated to
the metal atoms in a tetradentate fashion, while the bulkier ligand
in <b>5</b> is tridentate. The alkane elimination reactions
of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> with equimolar amounts of (Me<sub>3</sub>SiCH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Ln(THF)<sub>2</sub> (Ln = Y,
Lu) allowed us to obtain the monoalkyl complexes [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Ln(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (Ln = Y, R = Me, <i>n</i> = 1
(<b>6</b>); Ln = Lu, R = Me, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>7</b>); Ln = Y, R = <i>i</i>Pr, <i>n</i> = 2 (<b>8</b>)). The kinetics of thermal decomposition of complexes <b>6</b>–<b>8</b> were measured, and for <b>6</b> the activation energy was obtained from the temperature dependence
of the rate constants (<i>E</i><sub>a</sub> = 67.0 ±
1.3 kJ/mol). Complexes <b>6</b> and <b>7</b> turned out
to be inert toward H<sub>2</sub> and PhSiH<sub>3</sub>. Surprisingly,
complex <b>8</b> was inert toward H<sub>2</sub> and PhSiH<sub>3</sub> but rapidly cleaved C–O bonds of DME. The reaction
resulted in the formation of the methoxy complex {[C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Y(μ<sub>2</sub>-OMe)]}<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-DME) (<b>9</b>) and
methyl vinyl ether
Amido Analogues of Nonbent Lanthanide (II) and Calcium Metallocenes. Heterolytic Cleavage of π‑Bond Ln–Carbazolyl Ligand Promoted by Lewis Base Coordination
Introduction of four <i>t</i>Bu groups into a carbazol-yl
framework leads to switching of the metal–ligand bonding in
the Ln(II) and Ca complexes from σ to π. Complexes [(<i>t</i>Bu<sub>4</sub>Carb)<sub>2</sub>Ln] (Ln = Sm, Eu, Yb, Ca)
are amido analogues of metallocenes, which adopt the sandwich structures
with parallel disposition of the aromatic ligands and strong contribution
of η<sup>3</sup>-mode into η<sup>5</sup> metal–ligand
bonding. The DFT calculations demonstrated
that the geometry is due to steric effects (presence of the bulky <i>t</i>Bu groups) as well as the maximization of the overlap between
the Sm <sup>4</sup>f orbital and the π-type nitrogen lone pair
of the carbazol-yl ligand. Coordination of DME to the metal centers
in [(<i>t</i>Bu<sub>4</sub>Carb)<sub>2</sub>M] (M = Sm,
Yb) results in the heterolytic dissociation of the metal–ligand
π-bond and the formation of ionic complexes [<i>t</i>Bu<sub>4</sub>Carb<sup>–</sup>]<sub>2</sub>[Ln<sup>2+</sup>(DME)<sub><i>n</i></sub>]
Amido Ln(II) Complexes Coordinated by Bi- and Tridentate Amidinate Ligands: Nonconventional Coordination Modes of Amidinate Ligands and Catalytic Activity in Intermolecular Hydrophosphination of Styrenes and Tolane
Heteroleptic Ln(II) and Ca(II) amides
[<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)<sub>2</sub>]MN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)
(M = Yb (<b>1Yb</b>),
Ca (<b>1Ca</b>)), [2-MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)]LnN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF) (Ln = Sm (<b>2Sm</b>), Yb (<b>2Yb</b>)), and [2-Ph<sub>2</sub>P(O)C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-Me<sub>2</sub>-2,6)]YbN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)
(<b>3Yb</b>) coordinated by bi- and tridentate amidinate ligands
were obtained by the amine elimination reactions of M[N(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>](THF)<sub>2</sub> (M = Yb, Sm, Ca) with parent amidines
in good yields. Complex [<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>-2,6)<sub>2</sub>]SmN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub> can be obtained only by a salt metathesis reaction
of [<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>]SmI(THF)<sub>2</sub> with NaN(SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>. Unlike <b>1Yb</b> and <b>1Ca</b> in <b>1Sm</b> the amidinate ligand is coordinated to metal
ion in κ<sup>1</sup>-amido:η<sup>6</sup>-arene fashion
preventing THF coordination. The derivatives of tridentate amidinate
ligands bearing pendant donor 2-MeOC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub> or 2-Ph<sub>2</sub>P(O)C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>N groups feature nonconventional
κ<sup>1</sup>-N,κ<sup>2</sup>-O,η<sup>6</sup>-arene
coordination mode. Complexes <b>1Ca</b>, <b>1Sm</b>, <b>1Yb</b>, <b>2Sm</b>, <b>2Yb</b>, and <b>3Yb</b> proved to be efficient catalysts for styrene hydrophosphination
with PhPH<sub>2</sub> and Ph<sub>2</sub>PH. In styrene hydrophosphination
with PhPH<sub>2</sub> all the catalysts perform excellent chemoselectivity
and afford a monoaddition productsecondary phosphine (PhCH<sub>2</sub>CH<sub>2</sub>)PhPH. Moreover, all the catalysts perform hydrophosphination
reactions regioselectively with exclusive formation of the <i>anti-</i>Markovnikov addition product. Within the series of
complexes coordinated by the same amidinate ligand catalytic activity
decreases in the following order <b>1Ca</b> ≥ <b>1Sm</b>><b>1Yb</b>. The turnover frequencies were in the range
of
TOF ≈ 0.3–0.7 h<sup>–1</sup>. However, application
of tridentate amidinate ligand allowed one to increase catalytic activity
significantly: for <b>2Sm</b> TOF was found to be 8.3 h<sup>–1</sup>. For the addition of PhPH<sub>2</sub> to para-substituted
styrenes catalyzed by <b>2Sm</b> it was found that electron-withdrawing
substituents (Cl, F) do not affect the reaction rate while electron-donating
groups (<i>t</i>Bu, OMe) noticeably slow down the reaction
Chloro and Alkyl Rare-Earth Complexes Supported by <i>ansa</i>-Bis(amidinate) Ligands with a Rigid <i>o</i>‑Phenylene Linker. Ligand Steric Bulk: A Means of Stabilization or Destabilization?
<i>ansa</i>-Bis(amidinate) ligands with a rigid <i>o</i>-phenylene linker, C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)H}<sub>2</sub> (R = Me (<b>1</b>), <i>i</i>Pr (<b>2</b>)), were successfully employed for the synthesis of rare-earth chloro
and alkyl species. The reaction of dilithium derivatives of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> with LnCl<sub>3</sub> (Ln = Y, Lu) afforded
the monomeric bis(amidinate) chloro lanthanide complexes [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Y(THF)(μ-Cl)<sub>2</sub>Li(THF)<sub>2</sub> (R = Me (<b>3</b>), <i>i</i>Pr
(<b>5</b>)) and [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-Me<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]LuCl(THF)<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>). Bis(amidinate) ligands
in complexes <b>3</b> and <b>4</b> are coordinated to
the metal atoms in a tetradentate fashion, while the bulkier ligand
in <b>5</b> is tridentate. The alkane elimination reactions
of <b>1</b> and <b>2</b> with equimolar amounts of (Me<sub>3</sub>SiCH<sub>2</sub>)<sub>3</sub>Ln(THF)<sub>2</sub> (Ln = Y,
Lu) allowed us to obtain the monoalkyl complexes [C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-R<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Ln(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)(THF)<sub><i>n</i></sub> (Ln = Y, R = Me, <i>n</i> = 1
(<b>6</b>); Ln = Lu, R = Me, <i>n</i> = 1 (<b>7</b>); Ln = Y, R = <i>i</i>Pr, <i>n</i> = 2 (<b>8</b>)). The kinetics of thermal decomposition of complexes <b>6</b>–<b>8</b> were measured, and for <b>6</b> the activation energy was obtained from the temperature dependence
of the rate constants (<i>E</i><sub>a</sub> = 67.0 ±
1.3 kJ/mol). Complexes <b>6</b> and <b>7</b> turned out
to be inert toward H<sub>2</sub> and PhSiH<sub>3</sub>. Surprisingly,
complex <b>8</b> was inert toward H<sub>2</sub> and PhSiH<sub>3</sub> but rapidly cleaved C–O bonds of DME. The reaction
resulted in the formation of the methoxy complex {[C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>4</sub>-1,2-{NC(<i>t</i>Bu)N(2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>)}<sub>2</sub>]Y(μ<sub>2</sub>-OMe)]}<sub>2</sub>(μ<sub>2</sub>-DME) (<b>9</b>) and
methyl vinyl ether
Reactivity of Ytterbium(II) Hydride. Redox Reactions: Ytterbium(II) vs Hydrido Ligand. Metathesis of the Yb–H Bond
Oxidation reactions of the Yb(II) hydride [{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(μ-H)]<sub>2</sub> (<b>1</b>) with CuCl
(1:2 molar
ratio) and (PhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub> (1:1 molar ratio) revealed
that the hydrido anion in <b>1</b> is a stronger reductant than
the Yb(II) cation. Both reactions occur with evolution of H<sub>2</sub> and afford the dimeric Yb(II) species [{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(μ-X)]<sub>2</sub> (X = Cl (<b>2</b>), SCH<sub>2</sub>Ph (<b>3</b>)) in which a κ<sup>1</sup>-amido,η<sup>6</sup>-arene type of coordination of amidinate ligand is retained.
Reaction of <b>1</b> with 2 equiv of (PhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub> results in oxidation of both Yb(II) and hydrido centers and
leads to the formation of the Yb(III) complex [{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(μ-SCH<sub>2</sub>Ph)<sub>2</sub>]<sub>2</sub> (<b>4</b>). Complex <b>4</b> can be also synthesized
by oxidation of <b>3</b> with an equimolar amount of (PhCH<sub>2</sub>S)<sub>2</sub>. It was demonstrated that oxidation of the
ytterbium center to the trivalent state leads to switching of the
coordination mode of amidinate ligand from κ<sup>1</sup>-amido,
η<sup>6</sup>-arene to “classical” κ<sup>1</sup>,κ<sup>1</sup>-N,N-chelating. Unlike Yb(III) bis(alkyl)
species supported by bulky amidopyridinate ligands, the reaction of
[{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(CH<sub>2</sub>SiMe<sub>3</sub>)<sub>2</sub>(THF)] (<b>6</b>) with PhSiH<sub>3</sub> (1:2 molar
ratio) occurs with reduction of ytterbium to a divalent state and
affords <b>1</b>. Thus, reduction of Yb(III) to Yb(II) leads
to a change of coordination mode from κ<sup>1</sup>,κ<sup>1</sup>-N,N to κ<sup>1</sup>-N, η<sup>6</sup>-arene.
Oxidation of <b>1</b> by 2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>NC(H)C(H)NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub> was found to result
in oxidation of the hydrido ligand and ytterbium ion and formation
of the mixed-valent ion-pair complex [{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(DME)<sub>2</sub>]<sup>+</sup>[{2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>C<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>NC(H)C(H)NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>}<sub>2</sub>Yb]<sup>−</sup> (<b>5</b>). The σ-bond metathesis reaction of <b>1</b> with Ph<sub>2</sub>PH allowed for the synthesis of the first
mixed-ligand hydrido–phosphido Yb(II) species [{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}Yb(μ-H)(μ-PPh<sub>2</sub>)Yb{<i>t</i>BuC(NC<sub>6</sub>H<sub>3</sub>-2,6-<i>i</i>Pr<sub>2</sub>)<sub>2</sub>}] (<b>7</b>). The second hydrido ligand cannot
be replaced by a phosphido ligand