9 research outputs found
Assessment of fibrinolytic activity by measuring the lysis time of a tissue-factor-induced clot: a feasibility evaluation.
A clot lysis time assay in which a tissue factorāinduced fibrin clot is lysed by exogenously added tissue plasminogen activator has been recently reported. We evaluated the feasibility of clot lysis time in a routine hemostasis laboratory, and its correlation with thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 levels and changes with aging in 185 healthy participants. Clot lysis time was assessed by monitoring changes in turbidity during clot formation and subsequent lysis using a computerized kinetic spectrophotometric microtiter plate. After preliminary experiments, 100 and 160 ng/mL tissue plasminogen activator concentrations were chosen for the study. Clot lysis time was calculated by a new mathematical analysis of the lysis curve based on discrete derivative. Clot lysis time, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 plasma levels showed a normal distribution. For both concentrations of tissue plasminogen activator, clot lysis time progressively increased with increase in age (P < .0001) and was significantly correlated with thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor antigen, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor activity, and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen (at least P < .01). During linear regression analysis, thrombin activatable fibrinolysis inhibitor and plasminogen activator inhibitor-1 antigen were found to significantly influence clot lysis time (at least P < .01). Clot lysis time determination has a good laboratory performance. Our new method of calculation is independent of the time of reading and allows a more accurate and consistent detection of both short and prolonged lysis times. Our data suggest the feasibility of the use of this test in the work of routine hemostasis laboratory
Platelet function tests: a comparative review
Rita Paniccia,1,2 Raffaella Priora,1,2 Agatina Alessandrello Liotta,2 Rosanna Abbate1,2 1Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Thrombosis Center, University of Florence, Florence, Italy; 2Department of Heart and Vessels, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Careggi, Florence, Italy Abstract: In physiological hemostasis a prompt recruitment of platelets on the vessel damage prevents the bleeding by the rapid formation of a platelet plug. Qualitative and/or quantitative platelet defects promote bleeding, whereas the high residual reactivity of platelets in patients on antiplatelet therapies moves forward thromboembolic complications. The biochemical mechanisms of the different phases of platelet activation – adhesion, shape change, release reaction, and aggregation – have been well delineated, whereas their complete translation into laboratory assays has not been so fulfilled. Laboratory tests of platelet function, such as bleeding time, light transmission platelet aggregation, lumiaggregometry, impedance aggregometry on whole blood, and platelet activation investigated by flow cytometry, are traditionally utilized for diagnosing hemostatic disorders and managing patients with platelet and hemostatic defects, but their use is still limited to specialized laboratories. To date, a point-of-care testing (POCT) dedicated to platelet function, using pertinent devices much simpler to use, has now become available (ie, PFA-100, VerifyNow System, Multiplate Electrode Aggregometry [MEA]). POCT includes new methodologies which may be used in critical clinical settings and also in general laboratories because they are rapid and easy to use, employing whole blood without the necessity of sample processing. Actually, these different platelet methodologies for the evaluation of inherited and acquired bleeding disorders and/or for monitoring antiplatelet therapies are spreading and the study of platelet function is strengthening. In this review, well-tried and innovative platelet function tests and their methodological features and clinical applications are considered. Keywords: platelets, method, point-of-care testing, laboratory assessment, bleeding, thrombosi
Alterations of haemorheological parameters in patients with Peripheral Arterial Disease
Peripheral arterial disease (PAD), is a common manifestation of systemic atherosclerosis. Advances on the development of such vascular disease have described with a number of novel risk factors. Hyperviscosity, due to alterations of blood cells and plasma components, may play a role on the pathogenesis of the disease. Aim of this study was to evaluate the possible association between hemorheological variables and PAD. The hemorheological variables [whole blood viscosity (WBV), erythrocyte deformability index (DI), plasma viscosity (PLV)] were analyzed in 90 patients and in 180 healthy subjects. WBV and PLV were measured by a Rotational Viscosimeter and DI by a filtrometer. DI and PLV were significantly different in patients as compared to controls. To investigate the possible association between these parameters and the disease we divided the study population into tertiles. At the univariate analysis, we found a significant association between the highest tertiles of PLV, of DI and the disease. A model adjusted for traditional risk factors showed an association between highest tertiles of PLV and PAD. After adjustment for confounding parameters highest tertiles of PLV remained to be significantly associated with the disease. Our data indicate that an alteration of plasma viscosity may modulate the predisposition to PAD
PAIā1 and homocysteine, but not lipoprotein (a) and thrombophilic polymorphisms, are independently associated with the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events after successful coronary stenting
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the role of factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A polymorphism, plasminogen activator inhibitor type 1 (PAIā1) 4G/5G polymorphism, PAIā1, homocysteine, and lipoprotein (a) (Lp(a)) in the occurrence of major adverse cardiac events (MACE) in patients with acute coronary syndromes who underwent coronary stenting. DESIGN: 520 patients (375 men and 145 women) with acute coronary syndromes and 520 age and sex matched controls were enrolled. MACE were recorded for 109 patients. Heterozygosity for factor V Leiden, prothrombin G20210A polymorphism, and 4G/5G polymorphism did not significantly differ between patients with and without MACE. A significantly higher percentage of patients with increased homocysteine (28% v 19%, pā
<ā
0.001) and PAIā1 concentrations (25% v 16%, pā
<ā
0.001) had MACE with respect to those who did not. In KaplanāMeier survival analysis, the overall risk of MACE was significantly higher among patients with increased PAIā1 (pā
ā=āā
0.006) and homocysteine concentrations (pā
ā=āā
0.04). Cox regression analysis adjusted for age, sex, traditional cardiovascular risk factors, renal function, systolic left ventricular function, the number of stenosed vessels, and history of percutaneous coronary intervention or coronary artery bypass grafting showed that homocysteine (odds ratio 7.5, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.1 to 57.7, pā
<ā
0.05) and PAIā1 concentrations (odds ratio 5.3, 95% CI 1.2 to 23.8, pā
<ā
0.05) within the fifth quintile (with respect to the first) were significant and independent risk factors for the future occurrence of MACE. CONCLUSIONS: Increased PAIā1 and homocysteine concentrations are independent risk factors for MACE after successful coronary stenting, whereas Lp(a) and thrombophilic polymorphisms are not predictive