Justice at home, justice abroad: The accountability efforts relating to the conflicts in Eastern Ukraine, Northern Iraq and Syria

Twenty years after the entry into force of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, the international criminal justice project is as relevant as ever. With the failure of multilateral efforts to deliver justice to the victims of core international crimes committed in the context of armed conflicts in Syria, Northern Iraq and Eastern Ukraine, the ad hoc approaches to international justice and accountability are on the rise again. The vacuum created by the paralysis of the multilateral system has been filled by civil society actors and ad hoc responses created by war crimes units and regional cooperation frameworks. This thesis is based on the premise that universalisation of core international crimes definitions across different legal systems, and centralisation of domestic, regional and international accountability responses, are amongst the greatest achievements of the system of complementarity created by the Rome Statute, that became effectively operationalised through the use of universal jurisdiction. It has been submitted that although states with ongoing armed conflicts are facing particular challenges in relation to investigations and prosecutions of core international crimes, the implementation of the Rome Statute framework, as well as its operationalisation through the establishment of war crimes units, enables states to conduct successful cumulative prosecutions of core international crimes. This thesis argues that within this new international criminal justice ecosystem, consisting of a multitude of new actors and ad hoc collaboration frameworks, the roles and functions of state institutions, as well as the International Criminal Court, have to be redesigned in order to ensure that all the resources are streamlined into effective fight against impunity

States and International Criminal Justice: COST CA18228 Scoping Survey (version 2)

The data consists of two elements, both derived from a survey developed and administered through the EU Cost Action CA18228 (Global Atrocity Justice Constellations). The first element is made up of quantitative and categorical data; the second of qualitative text responses. The survey seeks to record and measure different elements of states' engagement with international criminal justice, including the integration of relevant provisions to domestic law; cooperation with and support for international and hybrid courts; various policy measures around prosecution of crimes defined in international law, and for the support of victims of such crimes; domestic prosecutions; NGO activity; and memorialisation, museums and other cultural activities. The survey covers 23 countries in Africa, the Americas, Asia and Europe. In each case, data was provided by individual scholars or teams of scholars coming from, working in, or working on the country in question. In some instances additional support was provided from NGOs or governmental agencies.Aksamitowska, Karolina; Andaya, Raymond; Anosova, Iuliia; Aydın-Aitchison, Andy; Bernasol, Joseph; Bhadra, Poulomi; Brandon, Emma; Buljubašić, Mirza; Chakrabarty, Ishita; Christensen, Mikkel Jarle; de León Agosto, Luis; Dobrovolskis, Martynas; Emasealu, Martha; Gërdeci, Alba; Ghiasi, Sumaya; Gómez Alcorta, Elizabeth; Hoffmann, Tamás; Higgins, Noelle; Hossain, Mohammad Pizuar; Hronum, Caroline; Jeiranashvili, Nika; Jusufi, Islam; Kirabira, Tonny; Lingaas, Carola; Lohne, Kjersti; Maguire, Gerard; Maljević, Almir; Mancini, Marina; Markevičiūtė, Ugnė; Martinaitytė, Laura; Matsiko, Samuel; Mejía, Gretel; Munivrana, Maja; Dalsgaard Nielsen, Toke Andersson; Oyewole, Oriola; Radmanović, Jelena; Ragaišytė, Ieva Marija; Ristivojević, Branislav; Roksandić, Sunčana; Samardžić, Stefan; Šestan, Katarina; Steponavičiūtė, Ramunė; Stojanović, Nikola; Švedas, Gintaras; Tamayo Gomez, Camilo; Vegh Weis, Valeria; Vosyliūtė, Andželika; Holá, Barbora; Rodrigues, Fatima; Vasiliev, Sergey. (2023). States and International Criminal Justice: COST CA18228 Scoping Survey (version 2), 2020-2023 [dataset]. University of Edinburgh. School of Law. https://doi.org/10.7488/ds/7536