Requirement of Aurora B in the Cdc2-independent chromosomal targeting of condensin I

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analysis of the role of Aurora B on the chromosomal targeting of condensin I"</p><p></p><p>Nucleic Acids Research 2007;35(7):2403-2412.</p><p>Published online 28 Mar 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874644.</p><p>© 2007 The Author(s)</p> Interphase extract was depleted with anti-Aurora B (lane 7), anti-Aurora A (lane 8) or anti-Cdc2 antibodies (lane 9). As a standard, 100% (lane 1) of mitotic extract, 100% (lane 2), 50% (lane 3), 25% (lane 4), 12.5% (lane 5) and 6.25% (lane 6) of interphase extract were loaded in parallel. Efficiency of immunodepletion was measured by quantitative immunoblotting using the antibodies indicated. Sperm nuclei were incubated with mitotic extract (lanes 1–4), or interphase extract (lane 5), OA-treated interphase extract (lane 6), OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Aurora B (lane 7), OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Aurora A (lane 8), and OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Cdc2 (lane 9). Chromatin or chromosomes were isolated, and 100% (lanes 1, 5–9), 50% (lane 2), 25% (lane 3) and 12.5% (lane 4) of the samples were blotted by anti-phospho-H3 antibody (upper), anti-XCAP-C (middle) or anti-XCAP-E (lower) antibodies. In the case of blotting with anti-condensin subunit antibodies, a lower amount of samples was used as a standard, namely, 25% (lane 1), 12.5% (lane 2), 6.3% (lane 3) and 3.1% (lane 4). Sperm chromatin was incubated with mitotic extract (a), interphase extract (b), OA-treated interphase extract (c), OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Aurora B (d), OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Aurora A (e) and OA-treated interphase extract depleted of Cdc2 (f). Samples were fixed and stained with Hoechst

Requirement of condensin in OA-dependent partial chromosome condensation in the interphase extract

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analysis of the role of Aurora B on the chromosomal targeting of condensin I"</p><p></p><p>Nucleic Acids Research 2007;35(7):2403-2412.</p><p>Published online 28 Mar 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874644.</p><p>© 2007 The Author(s)</p> Mitotic (lanes 1–2) and interphase (lanes 3–4) extracts were mock-depleted (lanes 1 and 3) or depleted with a mixture of affinity-purified condensin antibodies (lanes 2 and 4). Equal volumes of these extracts were subjected to SDS-PAGE, blotted, and detected using the indicated antibodies. Sperm chromatin was incubated with mock-depleted mitotic extract (lanes 1–4), condensin-depleted mitotic extract (lane 5), mock-depleted interphase extract (lane 6), mock-depleted interphase extract supplemented with OA (lane 7), condensin-depleted interphase extract (lane 8) or condensin-depleted interphase extract supplemented with OA (lane 9) at 22°C for 2 h. The assembled structures were isolated, and 25 (lane 1), 12.5 (lane 2), 6.3 (lane 3), 3.1 (lane 4) and 100% (lanes 5–9) were analyzed by immunoblotting with the indicated antibodies. Sperm chromatin was incubated with mitotic extract (a), condensin-depleted mitotic extract (b), mock-depleted interphase extract (c), mock-depleted interphase extract with OA (d), condensin-depleted interphase extract (e), or condensin-depleted interphase extract with OA (f) at 22°C for 2 h. After incubation, assembled chromatin structures were fixed and stained with Hoechst. Bar, 10 μm

Stimulation of chromosomal binding of condensin I by OA in interphase extracts

<p><b>Copyright information:</b></p><p>Taken from "Analysis of the role of Aurora B on the chromosomal targeting of condensin I"</p><p></p><p>Nucleic Acids Research 2007;35(7):2403-2412.</p><p>Published online 28 Mar 2007</p><p>PMCID:PMC1874644.</p><p>© 2007 The Author(s)</p> Sperm nuclei were incubated with mitotic extract (lanes 1–3), interphase extract (lanes 4–6), interphase extract supplemented with 1.2 (lanes 7–9), 3.6 (lanes 10–12) or 12 μM (lanes 13–15) of OA at 22°C for 2 h. Chromatin-bound proteins were dissolved with SDS-PAGE sample buffer, and 12.5 (lanes 1, 4, 7, 10 and 13), 25 (lanes 2, 5, 8, 11 and 14) and 50% (lanes 3, 6, 9, 12 and 15) of each sample were separated by SDS–PAGE, and immunoblotted with anti-phospho H3. Samples were prepared as described in (A), and 6.25% (lane 1), 12.5% (lanes 2, 4, 7, 10 and 13), 25% (lanes 3, 5, 8, 11 and 14) and 50% (lanes 6, 9, 12 and 15) of samples were blotted using anti-XCAP-E (upper), and anti-XCAP-G (lower) antibodies. Sperm chromatin was assembled in the mitotic extract (a, d), interphase extract (b, e, g), and interphase extract supplemented with 3.6 μM OA (c, f, h). Samples were fixed and stained with Hoechst (a, b, c; first low), and anti-XCAP-H antibody (d, e, f; second low, short exposure: g, h; third low, long exposure). Bar, 10 μm. () Sperm chromatin was assembled in the mitotic extract (a, c, e) or interphase extract supplemented with 3.6 μM OA (b, d, f). After assembly, the reaction mixtures were supplemented with the indicated extra concentration of KCl at 22°C for 20 min, fixed, and stained with Hoechst. Bar, 10 μm