17 research outputs found

    Component 1: Interpretation of the personalised feedback designs and data.

    No full text
    <p>Two higher order themes, represented by the large central circles, included the ability to accurately understand the visual physical activity data (A) and the enhancement of physical activity knowledge (B). The magnitude of the peripheral circles representing the lower order themes supporting the central theme, relate to the proportion of participants within each group identifying with each theme as indicated by the key at the foot of the figure.</p

    Two examples of the 3 variants of infographics depicting the multidimensional physical activity behavioural recommendations.

    No full text
    <p>Green represents a ‘hit’ target, amber a ‘near’ target (within 25%) and red a ‘missed’ target (>25% away). Graphic i) is a simple colour coded wheel format where each segment represents each dimension but has no magnitude; ii) uses a reference target bar to compare a coloured bar scaled to the relative value attained within each dimension; and graphic iii) places the individuals performance for each guideline as a bubble on a sliding scale relative to the target value represented by the central line. The varied nature of physical activity ‘status’ is highlighted by the data from the two participants where A is an individual who has hit their vigorous activity target and is short on the other four dimensions and B is a participant who has a high PAL and considerable moderate intensity activity but is still quite sedentary and has very little vigorous intensity activity.</p

    Demographic characteristics of all participants included in the analyses.

    No full text
    <p><sup>a</sup> = Values reported as mean (standard deviation)</p><p><sup>b</sup> = Physical activity dimensions that were presented in the ‘health target’ section of the feedback were as follows: </p><p></p><p></p><p>Physical activity level (PAL) was the average total daily energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate (Kcal/day);</p><p></p><p></p><p>Daily sedentary time was the percentage of a 16 hour waking day (8 hours of sleep was assumed and subtracted from the total sedentary time) spent sedentary (<1.5 METs);</p><p></p><p></p><p>Daily moderate activity was the average number of single minutes of moderate activity (≥3 METs, <6 METs);</p><p></p><p></p><p>Weekly moderate-vigorous bouts included all activity greater than 3 METs sustained for at least a period of 10 minutes;</p><p></p><p></p><p>Weekly vigorous activity combined all the minutes of vigorous activity (>6 METs) accumulated over the monitored week.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Physical activity level (PAL) was the average total daily energy expenditure/basal metabolic rate (Kcal/day);</p><p>Daily sedentary time was the percentage of a 16 hour waking day (8 hours of sleep was assumed and subtracted from the total sedentary time) spent sedentary (<1.5 METs);</p><p>Daily moderate activity was the average number of single minutes of moderate activity (≥3 METs, <6 METs);</p><p>Weekly moderate-vigorous bouts included all activity greater than 3 METs sustained for at least a period of 10 minutes;</p><p>Weekly vigorous activity combined all the minutes of vigorous activity (>6 METs) accumulated over the monitored week.</p><p>Demographic characteristics of all participants included in the analyses.</p

    Follow-up time, existing disease at baseline, % (n) with new disease diagnoses, and HSU variables by physical activity and function groups.

    No full text
    a)<p>Low significantly different to medium and high group.</p>b)<p>Low significantly different to medium group.</p>c)<p>Medium significantly different to high group.</p>d)<p>Low significantly different to high group.</p

    Negative binomial regression predicting use of consultations and prescriptions based on measures of physical activity.

    No full text
    <p>IRR (incidence rate ratio), which is defined as <i>e</i><sup>B</sup>, where B is the regression coefficients.</p><p><b>Model 1</b>: adjusting a baseline covariates, including age, gender, educational attainment, IMD tertile, weight status, and number of self-reported chronic illnesses, and also GP Management System, and time lapse to follow-up;</p><p><b>Model 2</b>: additionally adjusting for lower limb function.</p
    corecore