34 research outputs found

    Cox proportional hazard model of the time to detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i> bacilli on MGIT960 based on 344 patients at the Mubende referral hospital.

    No full text
    <p>Cox proportional hazard model of the time to detection of <i>M. tuberculosis</i> bacilli on MGIT960 based on 344 patients at the Mubende referral hospital.</p

    The logistic regression model shows the diagnostic utility of using DZM within the screening algorithm in (Figure 2).

    No full text
    <p>Area under ROC curve (AUC) = 0.843 <sup>without DZM</sup>, 0.886<sup> with DZM</sup> * Case classification with adjusted cut –off probability = 0.19 at (Sensitivity = 0.81, Specificity = 0.80).</p

    Drug susceptibility profiles for DZM false negative cases at Mubende regional referral hospital, Uganda.

    No full text
    <p>LJ = Lowenstein-Jensen; S = streptomycin; E = Ethambutol; I = Isoniazid; R = Rifampicin: MDR-TB multi drug resistant Tuberculosis, Drug resistance r = resistant, s = susceptible.</p

    Diagnostic performance of DZM&DFM against culture on LJ (gold standard) in detection of bacilli in clinical samples obtained from patients at Mubende referral hospital, Uganda.

    No full text
    <p>*DFM is used as the gold standard with DZM. Note that the rest of the comparison is done with Results on LJ media as the gold standard. The status (+/−) of the reference tool will be the column status while the test tool is the row. For example (DZM/DFM) = row (+/−)/col(+/−).</p
    corecore