28 research outputs found

    Frailty and outcomes in heart failure patients from high-, middle-, and low-income countries

    Get PDF
    Background and Aims: There is little information on the incremental prognostic importance of frailty beyond conventional prognostic variables in heart failure (HF) populations from different country income levels. Methods: A total of 3429 adults with HF (age 61 ± 14 years, 33% women) from 27 high-, middle- and low-income countries were prospectively studied. Baseline frailty was evaluated by the Fried index, incorporating handgrip strength, gait speed, physical activity, unintended weight loss, and self-reported exhaustion. Mean left ventricular ejection fraction was 39 ± 14% and 26% had New York Heart Association Class III/IV symptoms. Participants were followed for a median (25th to 75th percentile) of 3.1 (2.0–4.3) years. Cox proportional hazard models for death and HF hospitalization adjusted for country income level; age; sex; education; HF aetiology; left ventricular ejection fraction; diabetes; tobacco and alcohol use; New York Heart Association functional class; HF medication use; blood pressure; and haemoglobin, sodium, and creatinine concentrations were performed. The incremental discriminatory value of frailty over and above the MAGGIC risk score was evaluated by the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve. Results: At baseline, 18% of participants were robust, 61% pre-frail, and 21% frail. During follow-up, 565 (16%) participants died and 471 (14%) were hospitalized for HF. Respective adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for death among the pre-frail and frail were 1.59 (1.12–2.26) and 2.92 (1.99–4.27). Respective adjusted hazard ratios (95% confidence interval) for HF hospitalization were 1.32 (0.93–1.87) and 1.97 (1.33–2.91). Findings were consistent among different country income levels and by most subgroups. Adding frailty to the MAGGIC risk score improved the discrimination of future death and HF hospitalization. Conclusions: Frailty confers substantial incremental prognostic information to prognostic variables for predicting death and HF hospitalization. The relationship between frailty and these outcomes is consistent across countries at all income levels

    Clinical outcomes of levosimendan versus dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and impaired renal function

    No full text
    To assess the clinical outcomes of levosimendan and dobutamine in patients with acute decompensated heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and impaired renal function in Indian scenario. Cardiac, renal, electrolytes and hepatic parameters as well as the clinical outcomes were assessed. Levosimendan and dobutamine improved ejection fraction significantly. Levosimendan in comparison to dobutamine, increased cardiac output (0.76 vs. −0.38 at 48 h, 1.15 vs. −0.31 day 7, -2.02 vs. −1.51 day 30), cardiac index (0.89 vs.-0.13 at 48 h, 1.16 vs. −0.07 at day 7 and 1.05 vs. −0.25 at day 30) and eGFR (−1.4 vs. −0.75 at day 30) significantly. Levosimendan reduced ICU stay (p = 0.038) significantly whereas dobutamine decreased the hospital stay duration (p = 0.015). There was no major difference in re-hospitalization and mortality between groups. Ventricular tachyarrhythmia was the main adverse event noted in Levosimendan arm. Levosimendan showed improved cardiac as well as renal outcomes within a month when compared to dobutamine and it is the first study to determine the renal parameters of Levosimendan in an Indian setting

    Population access to reperfusion services for ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in Kerala, India

    No full text
    Background: Population access to timely reperfusion is a decisive factor in determining the success and acceptability of any regional system of ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) care. We sought to determine the proportion of population of the southern Indian state of Kerala having timely access to STEMI reperfusion. Methods: We identified the STEMI reperfusion facilities available at all acute-care hospitals, in Kerala, by conducting a cross-sectional survey. We mapped the geographical catchment areas of these hospitals using historical travel speeds and appropriate Geospatial Information Systems (GIS) analyses. Subsequently, using block level population data, we estimated the proportion of the population residing within these geographies. Results: We estimated that 23.33 million people, forming 69.84% of the state population, resided in the green zone (within half-hour travel distance of a percutaneous coronary intervention [PCI]-capable hospital), which covered 47.94% of the geographical area of the state. Outside this green zone, 21.87% of the state population resided within 1 hr travel distance of a thrombolysis-capable hospital. Finally, 8.28% of the state population resided in the red zone, where access to any reperfusion-capable hospital took >1 hr, which covered 22.15% of the geographical area of the state. Conclusions: A majority of the population of Kerala had timely access to PCI-capable hospitals. GIS-based mapping of Indian states, in terms of access to STEMI reperfusion, may help devise protocols to achieve seamless transfer of patients to reperfusion-capable hospitals. Such regionalization of STEMI care would enhance organizational synergies to achieve better access to reperfusion, especially in remote areas

    Prognostic value of soluble ST2 biomarker in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction – A multicenter study

    No full text
    Objective: To study the prognostic value of soluble Suppression of Tumorigenicity-2 (sST2) in heart failure patients with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF). Methods: In this prospective, observational, multicenter study, patients with heart failure (HF) and left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) <50% were included. Clinical evaluation and serum levels of sST2 were estimated at five time points during follow up. Study endpoint was the relationship of baseline and serial sST2 concentration in the blood to the composite endpoints of cardiac death and re-hospitalization for worsening of HF during one year follow up period. Results: A total of 141 patients were enrolled. The mean age was 60 ± 10.4 years. At baseline evaluation, 49.6% patients were in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class III and 36.2% in class IV. Adverse events were observed in 57 patients (40.4%); 25 (17.7%) were re-hospitalized due to worsening of HF and 32 (22.7%) died due to cardiac causes. The median value of baseline sST2 was 46.36 ng/ml (IQR 31.30–78.38). sST2 concentration at baseline was significantly higher among patients with adverse events in comparison to patients without adverse events (p = <0.001). Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) for baseline sST2 concentration identified 49 ng/ml as optimal cut-off value to predict cardiac death and re-hospitalization, with a sensitivity and specificity of 72% and 75%, respectively. Conclusion: In patients with HFrEF, sST2 concentration at baseline as well as on serial testing was significantly correlated with cardiac death and re-hospitalization for worsening of HF. Keywords: Heart failure, sST2, Biomarker, Prognosis, Serial testin

    Comparison of resting and adenosine-free pressure indices with adenosine-induced hyperemic fractional flow reserve in intermediate coronary lesions

    No full text
    Objective: Fractional flow reserve (FFR) using adenosine has been the gold standard in the functional assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses in the catheterization laboratory. We aim to study the correlation of adenosine-free indices such as whole cycle Pd/Pa [the ratio of mean distal coronary pressure (Pd) to the mean pressure observed in the aorta (Pa)], instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR), and contrast-induced submaximal hyperemia (cFFR) with FFR. Methods: This multicenter, prospective, observational study included patients with stable angina or acute coronary syndrome (>48 h since onset) with discrete intermediate coronary lesions (40–70% diameter stenosis). All patients underwent assessment of whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, cFFR, and FFR. We then evaluated the correlation of these indices with FFR and assessed the diagnostic efficiencies of them against FFR ≤0.80. Results: Of the 103 patients from three different centers, 83 lesions were included for analysis. The correlation coefficient (r value) of whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, and cFFR in relation to FFR were +0.84, +0.77, and +0.70 (all p values < 0.001), respectively, and the c-statistic against FFR ≤0.80 were 0.92 (0.86–0.98), 0.89(0.81–0.97), and 0.91 (0.85–0.97) (all p values < 0.001), respectively. The best cut-off values identified by receiver–operator characteristic curve for whole cycle Pd/Pa, iFR, and cFFR were 0.94, 0.90, and 0.88, respectively, for an FFR ≤0.80. By the concept of “adenosine-free zone” (iFR = 0.86–0.93), 59% lesions in this study would not require adenosine. Conclusion: All the three adenosine-free indices had good correlation with FFR. There is no difference in the diagnostic accuracies among the indices in functional evaluation of discrete intermediate coronary stenoses. However, further validation is needed before adoption of adenosine-free pressure parameters into clinical practice. Keywords: Intermediate coronary stenosis, Fractional flow reserve, Instantaneous wave-free ratio, Whole cycle Pd/Pa, Contrast FF

    Coronary plaque and clinical characteristics of South Asian (Indian) patients with acute coronary syndromes : an optical coherence tomography study

    No full text
    Background: South Asians, and Indians in particular, are known to have a higher incidence of premature atherosclerosis and acute coronary syndromes (ACS) with worse clinical outcomes, compared to populations with different ethnic backgrounds. However, the underlying pathobiology accounting for these differences has not been fully elucidated. Methods: ACS patients who had culprit lesion optical coherence tomography (OCT) imaging were enrolled. Culprit plaque characteristics were evaluated using OCT. Results: Among 1315 patients, 100 were South Asian, 1009 were East Asian, and 206 were White. South Asian patients were younger (South Asians vs. East Asians vs. Whites: 51.6 ± 13.4 vs. 65.4 ± 11.9 vs. 62.7 ± 11.7; p < 0.001) and more frequently presented with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) (77.0% vs. 56.4% vs. 35.4%; p < 0.001). On OCT analysis after propensity group matching, plaque erosion was more frequent (57.0% vs. 38.0% vs. 50.0%; p = 0.003), the lipid index was significantly greater (2281.6 [1570.8–3160.6] vs. 1624.3 [940.9–2352.4] vs. 1303.8 [1090.0–1757.7]; p < 0.001), and the prevalence of layered plaque was significantly higher in the South Asian group than in the other two groups (52.0% vs. 30.0% vs. 34.0%; p = 0.003). Conclusions: Compared to East Asians and Whites, South Asians with ACS were younger and more frequently presented with STEMI. Plaque erosion was the predominant pathology for ACS in South Asians and their culprit lesions had more features of plaque vulnerability. Clinical Trial Registration: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov, NCT03479723</p

    COVID-19 infected ST-Elevation myocardial infarction in India (COSTA INDIA)

    No full text
    Objective: To find out differences in the presentation, management and outcomes of COVID-19 infected STEMI patients compared to age and sex-matched non-infected STEMI patients treated during the same period. Methods: This was a retrospective multicentre observational registry in which we collected data of COVID-19 positive STEMI patients from selected tertiary care hospitals across India. For every COVID-19 positive STEMI patient, two age and sex-matched COVID-19 negative STEMI patients were enrolled as control. The primary endpoint was a composite of in-hospital mortality, re-infarction, heart failure, and stroke. Results: 410 COVID-19 positive STEMI cases were compared with 799 COVID-19 negative STEMI cases. The composite of death/reinfarction/stroke/heart failure was significantly higher among the COVID-19 positive STEMI patients compared with COVID-19 negative STEMI cases (27.1% vs 20.7% p value = 0.01); though mortality rate did not differ significantly (8.0% vs 5.8% p value = 0.13). Significantly lower proportion of COVID-19 positive STEMI patients received reperfusion treatment and primary PCI (60.7% vs 71.1% p value=< 0.001 and 15.4% vs 23.4% p value = 0.001 respectively). Rate of systematic early PCI (pharmaco-invasive treatment) was significantly lower in the COVID-19 positive group compared with COVID-19 negative group. There was no difference in the prevalence of high thrombus burden (14.5% and 12.0% p value = 0.55 among COVID-19 positive and negative patients respectively) Conclusions: In this large registry of STEMI patients, we did not find significant excess in in-hospital mortality among COVID-19 co-infected patients compared with non-infected patients despite lower rate of primary PCI and reperfusion treatment, though composite of in-hospital mortality, re-infarction, stroke and heart failure was higher
    corecore