15 research outputs found
νκ΅ λ§λ§μμλ³μ± νμμ μμ λ° λ‘λμ μ μ μμ λμ°λ³μ΄ μμ
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μνκ³Ό μκ³Όνμ 곡,2005.Maste
The role of toll-like receptor on corneal resident cells in maintaining ocular homeostasis
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ (λ°μ¬)-- μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ : μνκ³Ό, 2011.2. μμλ.Docto
μ΄λ¦°μΆ©λ¨ 56νΈ-[κΆλμΈ]μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ§μλ°μ μ μν μλ‘μ΄ λμ
1844λ
12μ μΆμ΄ κ²¨μΈ μ΄λ λ , μκ΅ λ‘μΉλ°μΌ μ§λ°© 28λͺ
μ λ
Έλμλ€μ κ°μ 1νμ΄λ μ©μ 곡λμΆμνμ¬ μμ λ€μκ² νμν μννμ 곡λꡬ맀ν μμ μ ν¬λ₯Ό κ°μ€νμμ΅λλ€.
μΈλ₯ μ΅μ΄μ κ·Όλμ μΈ νλμ‘°ν©μ΄ κ·Έ λͺ¨μ΅μ λλ¬λΈ κ²μ
λλ€. λΉμ λ‘μΉλ°μΌ μ¬λλ€μ μ€λ λκΈ°κ·Όκ³Ό μ΄μ
ν λ
Έλ쑰건μΌλ‘ μΆμ ν¬λ§μ μκ³ μμμ΅λλ€. νμ§λ§ κ·Έλ€μ μμ λ€μ μμΈν νμ€μ ꡴볡νμ§ μμκ³ νλμ‘°ν©κΈ°μ
μ΄λΌλ μλ‘μ΄ λ°©μμ ν΅ν΄ μ€μ€λ‘μ νμΌλ‘ μΆμ κ°μ²νκ³ μ νμμ΅λλ€.
-μ΄ν μλ΅N/
Downlink Channel Extrapolation for FDD Multiple Antenna Systems Through Neural Network Using Extracted Uplink Path Gains
Masterλ³Έ λ
Όλ¬Έμ μ£Όνμ λΆν λμ μ‘μμ (FDD) μμ€ν
μμ μΆμΆλ μ/νν₯λ§ν¬ μ±λ μ΄λμ κ°κ° μ
/μΆλ ₯μΌλ‘ κ°λ μ κ²½νλ‘λ§(neural network)μ μ΄μ©νμ¬ μν₯λ§ν¬ μ±λ μ΄λμ ν΅ν΄ νν₯λ§ν¬ μ±λ μΆμ λ°©λ²μ κ³ μνμλ€. μ±λ μ체λ₯Ό μ κ²½νλ‘λ§μ μ
/μΆλ ₯μΌλ‘ νμμ λμ λΉνμ¬ νμ΅μ μμλ μκ°μ΄ κ°μνκ³ νμ΅μ μ νλκ° ν₯μλμλ€. μ μλ λ°©λ²μ κΈ°μ‘΄μ νν₯λ§ν¬ μ±λ μΆμ μμ νμν μ±λ νλ ¨ λ° νΌλλ°± κ³Όμ μ μλ΅ν¨μΌλ‘μ¨ κ³ μμμλ μμ μ μΈ μ±λ₯μ΄ λ³΄μ₯λλ€.When base stations (BSs) are deployed with multiple antennas, they need to have downlink (DL) channel state information (CSI) to optimize downlink transmissions by beamforming. The DL CSI is usually measured at mobile stations (MSs) through DL training and fed back to the BS in frequency division duplexing (FDD). The DL training and uplink (UL) feedback might become infeasible due to insufficient coherence time interval when the channel rapidly changes due to high speed of MSs. Without the feedback from MSs, it may be possible for the BS to directly obtain the DL CSI using the inherent relation of UL and DL channels even in FDD, which is called DL extrapolation. Although the exact relation would be highly nonlinear, previous studies have shown that a neural network (NN) can be used to estimate the DL CSI from the UL CSI at the BS. Most of previous works on this line of research trained the NN using full dimensional UL and DL channels; however, the NN training complexity becomes severe as the number of antennas at the BS increases. To reduce the NN training complexity and improve DL CSI estimation quality, this paper proposes a path gain extraction technique to simplify the input and output of the NN. It is shown through many measurement campagines that the UL and DL channels still share common components like path delays and angles in FDD. The proposed technique first extracts these common coefficients from the UL and DL channels and trains the NN only using remaining components with reduced dimensions compared to the full UL and DL channels. Extensive simulation results show that the proposed technique outperforms the conventional approach, which relies on the full UL and DL channels to train the NN, regardless of the speed of MSs
μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ°κ΅¬ν μ 5μ°¨ μν¬μ (λ₯λ³μ€,μ΅νμ§)
μ¬ λ€μ΄ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ λν μ¬ν¬μ§μκ³Ό μΈλ―Έλ, ν λ‘ νκ° μ νμ΄λ€. μ΄ μ νμ μ λΆμ μ§λ°©μ λΆ μ£Όλμ βμ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ‘μ±λ²βμ μ μ λ°λ₯Έ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ€λ¦½ μ¦κ° λ° μ¬νμ μΌμ리μ νλμ κΈ°μΈνλ λ°κ° ν¬λ€.
μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μΌ λΆλΆμΈ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ¦κ°μ λ°μ λ§μΌλ‘ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ±κ³Όμ ν
κ³λ₯Ό κ·μ ν μ μμΌλ, μ°λ¦¬μ νμ€ μ¬κ±΄μ λ²κ³Ό μ λ, μ μ±
κ³Ό μ¬μ μ μν μ¬νμ
κΈ°μ
μ νμ€μ μ‘΄μ¬μ λλ¦μ μ±κ³Όλ₯Ό 무μνκ³ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ νμ¬μ μλ―Έλ₯Ό λ
Όν μ μλ€.
μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ΄ λ°μ ν΄ μ§μμ¬νμμ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ ν μΆμ λ΄λΉν΄ μ§μμ¬νμ κΈ°μ¬
ν μ μκΈ° μν΄μλ 무μ보λ€λ μ§μλ°μ°©νμ΄λΌλ κ°λ
μ΄ κ·μ λμ΄μΌ νλ©°, λν
λ²μλ μ ν΄μ ΈμΌ νλ€. λμκ° μ λΆμ μ§λ°©μ λΆ μ£Όλλ‘ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ΄ μΈμ¦, μ‘μ±λ
λ νμ¬μ νμ€μμλ κ΄μμλ λ¨μμ μ§μνΉμ±κ³Ό κ²½μ μ , μ¬νμ νν©μ΄ λΆμλμ΄μ ΈμΌ νλ€. λν μ§μλ¨μμ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ νΉμ±(μ¬μ
λΆμΌ, μ¬μ
λ΄μ©)μ λΆμν΄ μ§
μλ°μ°©νμ΄λ κ°λ
κ·μ μ λ°λ₯Έ μ ν©μ±κ³Ό μν₯λ ₯μ΄ λΆμ, νκ°λμ΄μΌ νλ€.
- μ΄ν μλ΅οΏ[μ 1μ£Όμ ] λκ΅¬κ²½λΆ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ΄ν΄ -μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ€μ¬μΌλ‘-
(λ₯λ³μ€ λκ΅¬κ²½λΆ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ§μμΌν° μΌν°μ₯)
1.μλ‘
2.λꡬ경λΆμ§μ νν©
3.μ§μ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ±κ³Όμ νκ³
4.μ μ±
μ μ μΈ
οΏ[μ 2μ£Όμ ] μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬ (μ΅νμ§ μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬)
1.νλμ‘°ν©μ μ μμ κ°μΉ, 7λ μμΉ
2. μμ£Ό μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ΄λμ μμ¬
3.μμ£Όνλμ‘°ν©μ΄λνμν 창립배경
4.νμλ¨μ²΄ νν©
5.νλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬ μ‘°μ§
6.μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬ 2011λ
μ£Όμμ¬μ
7.μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬ λΉμ
8.μ§μ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ΄λμ λ³΄λ€ λμ λ―Έλλ₯Ό μν μ λ΅
οΏ[μ°Έκ³ μλ£]
μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬μ μ΄μ , μ€λ, λ΄μΌ (μ΅νμ§ μμ£Όνλμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬
μ 3μ°¨ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ°κ΅¬ν μν¬μ (μ‘°μ°μ,μ΅νμ§)
οΏ[μ 1μ£Όμ ] μκ΅ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ΄ν΄ "μκ΅μ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
κ³Ό μ¬νμ ν¬μ"
οΏ[μ 2μ£Όμ ] μ΄ν리μ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ΄ν΄
"νΈλ ν μ λ³Όλ‘λ μ¬λ‘λ‘ λ³Έ μ΄ν리μ νλμ‘°ν© μ΄λ" (μ΅νμ§ μμ£Όμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬)οΏ[μ 1μ£Όμ ] μκ΅ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ΄ν΄ "μκ΅μ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
κ³Ό μ¬νμ ν¬μ"
(μ‘°μ°μ μκΈ°μ
λ°μ μ μ°κ΅¬μ)
I.μκ΅ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
Overview
II.μκ΅Social Investment Overview
III.μκ΅ Social Investment & SE μ μ±
νΉμ§
IV.Social Impact Bond
οΏ[μ 2μ£Όμ ] μ΄ν리μ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μ΄ν΄
"νΈλ ν μ λ³Όλ‘λ μ¬λ‘λ‘ λ³Έ μ΄ν리μ νλμ‘°ν© μ΄λ" (μ΅νμ§ μμ£Όμ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬)
I.νκ΅κ³Ό μ΄ν리μμ μ°¨μ΄
II.νλμ‘°ν©
III.κ²°λ‘ μ λμ νλ©°
- GROWING SOCIAL VENTURES
- SOCIAL INVESTMENT TEN TEARS O
μ 3μ°¨ μΆ©λ¨ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ½λ‘ν€μ 'μ¬νμ κΈ°μ μ μ± μΆμ§νν©κ³Ό ν₯νμ λ§' (κΉμ μ ,μ΅νμ§,μ΅μ ν¬,νμ¬μ°¬)
μ 3μ°¨ μΆ©λ¨ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ½λ‘ν€μ
μ½λ‘ν€μ(Colloquium)μ΄λ "λͺ¨μ¬μ λ§νκΈ°, λννκΈ°" λΌλ λ»μ λ΄κ³ μμΌλ©° μΌλ°μ μλ―Έλ‘ κ³΅κ³΅μ μ₯μμμ μ΄λ€ μ£Όμ λ₯Ό λκ³ μ¬λ¬ μ¬λμ΄ κ³΅λ ν μνλ λ°©μμ μλ―Έ
1. νμ¬κ°μ
β μΌ μ : 2012λ
5μ 4μΌ(κΈ) 14:00 ~ 16:00 β μ₯ μ : μΆ©λ¨λ°μ μ°κ΅¬μ λνμμ€ (1μΈ΅)
β λ μ : μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ κ΄μ¬μλ μ°κ΅¬μ, κ΅μ, μ€μ²κ°, 곡무μ λ±
2. νμ¬λͺ©μ
β μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ μνκ³ νμ±μ μν μ΄λ‘ λ° μ€μ²λ°©μ
β μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ‘°μ§μ νμ±ν λ° κ΅¬μ±μμ μλκ°ν
β μΆ©λ¨λ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ¬μ
μ λ°κ΅΄ λ° μ μ±
μ§μ λ°©μ λ±
-μ΄ν μλ΅I.μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ¬μ
체 μνκ³μ μν
II.λμ μ λ¬Έμ μμ1.2
III.λμ μ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μνκ³ μ λ΅ 1.2.3.4.5.6
IV.μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ±
μ μ§μνμ λν μκ°
V.μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
κ° μ μ μ κΈ°μ΄ν μ¬νμ κ²½μ
VI.μμ‘΄μ μκΈ°μ μ²ν μ¬νμ κ²½μ
VII.μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ κ³Όμ
VIII.μλ‘μ΄ 5κ°λ
κ³νμ λν λͺκ°μ§ μκ°
μ 3μ°¨ μΆ©λ¨ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ½λ‘ν€μ 'μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ±
μΆμ§νν©κ³Ό ν₯νμ λ§'
[λ°ν]
οΏνλμ‘°ν©κ³Ό μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ κ΄κ³ λ° λ°μ λ°©ν₯ (μ΅νμ§ νκ΅μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ§ν₯μ κΈ°λ°μ‘°μ±λ³ΈλΆ λ³ΈλΆμ₯)
[ν λ‘ ]
οΏν λ‘ 1. μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ±
μ κ³Όμ (μ΅μ ν¬ μΆ©λ¨μ¬νκ²½μ λ€νΈμν¬ μ¬λ¬΄μ²μ₯)
οΏν λ‘ 2. μ¬μ
체 μ§μμμ μ¬νμ κ²½μ μνκ³λ‘ μ ν (κΉμ μ νλΏλ¦¬μ¬λλ€ μμμ΄μ¬)
οΏν λ‘ 3. μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ΄ μΆκ΅¬νκ³ μνλ μΈμ - νλκ³Ό νλ ₯, νΈνμ μ°λ
(νμ¬μ°¬ μΆ©λΆμ¬νμ κ²½μ μΌν° μ§μκ΅μ₯
Clinical Outcomes of Penetrating Keratoplasty in Patients Five Years or Younger
λͺ©μ : 5μΈ μ΄ν νμμμ μνλ μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ μ μ±μ κ³Ό μ΄λ₯Ό κ²°μ νλ μΈμλ₯Ό μμλ³Έλ€. λμκ³Ό λ°©λ²: μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ μ μν λ°μ 5μΈ μ΄ν νμ 29λͺ
31μμ λμμΌλ‘ νμμ μ±λ³, λμ΄, μμΈ κ°λ§ μ§ν, μμ ν ν©λ³μ¦,κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ μ΄μμ€ν¨μμΈμ λν΄ νν₯μ μΌλ‘ μ‘°μ¬νμλ€. κ²°κ³Ό: μμ ν νκ· 78.72 Β± 8.94κ°μ ν μ΄μ΄μνΈμμ‘΄μ¨μ 51.6%μλ€. μ ν κΈ°κ°λ³ μ΄μνΈ μμ‘΄μ¨μ μ ν 6κ°μμ 77.4%, 12κ°μμ61.3%, 2λ
μ 57.5%, κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ 5λ
μ 49.5%μλ€. μμΈκ°λ§μ§νλΉλλ 곡λ§κ°λ§ν(35.5%), νΌν° μ΄μ(25.8%), μ μ² λ
Ήλ΄μ₯(9.7%) μμΌλ‘λμκ³ , μμΈκ°λ§μ§νμ λ°λΌ μ΄μνΈμ μμ‘΄μκ°μ μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμλ€(p?0.05). μμ λΉμ μ°λ Ήμ κΈ°μ€μΌλ‘ 12κ°μ λ―Έλ§(n=13),12κ°μμμ 48κ°μ μ¬μ΄(n=12), κ·Έλ¦¬κ³ 48κ°μ μ΄μ(n=6)μΌλ‘ ꡬλΆνμμ λ μ°λ Ήμ λ°λ₯Έ μ΄μνΈ μμ‘΄μκ°μ μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμμΌλ(p=0.037) μ΄μ΄μνΈμμ‘΄μ¨μλ μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμλ€. κ²°λ‘ : 5μΈ μ΄ν νμμμ μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ μ ν κ²½μ° μμΈκ°λ§μ§νμ μ’
λ₯κ° μ΄μνΈμ μμ‘΄μ¨μ μ μν μν₯μ μ£Όμλ€.N
Comparative Analysis of Clinical Outcome in Penetrating Keratoplasty Using Domestic or Imported Cornea
λͺ©μ : κ΅λ΄κ³΅μ¬κ°λ§κ³Ό ν΄μΈκ³΅μ¬κ°λ§μ μ΄μ©ν μ μΈ΅ κ°λ§ μ΄μμ ν μμ‘΄μ¨ λ° κ°λ§λ΄νΌμΈν¬ λ°λ λ³νλ₯Ό λΉκ΅ν΄ λ³΄κ³ μ νμλ€. λμκ³Ό λ°©λ²: μμΈλνκ΅λ³μμμ 2004λ
11μλΆν° 2011λ
8μκΉμ§ μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ μ μν λ°μ νμ μ€ λ°±λ΄μ₯ μ κ±°μ μ΄μΈμ λ€λ₯Έμμ μ΄ λ³νλ κ²½μ°λ₯Ό μ μΈνκ³ μ΅μ 1λ
κ° κ²½κ³Όκ΄μ°°μ΄ κ°λ₯νμλ 211λͺ
236μμ λμμΌλ‘ κ΅λ΄κ³΅μ¬κ°λ§κ΅°(108μ)κ³Ό ν΄μΈκ³΅μ¬κ°λ§κ΅°(128μ)μΌλ‘ λλμ΄ μ무기λ‘μ νν₯μ μΌλ‘ λΆμνμλ€. κ° κ·Έλ£Ή κ° λμ΄, μ±λ³, μμ μ μ§λ¨λͺ
, κΈ°μ¦μ μ°λ Ή, 곡μ¬μ μ¬λ§λΆν° κ°λ§μ΄μνΈ λ³΄μ‘΄μκ°κ³Ό 곡μ¬μ μ¬λ§λΆν° μ΄μμκ°, μμ μ ν κ΅μ μλ ₯, μμ ν 3, 6, 12κ°μμ§Έ, μ΄ν 1λ
λ¨μλ§λ€ κ°λ§λ΄νΌμΈν¬ λ°λκ°μμ¨ λ° μμ‘΄μ¨ λ±μ λΉκ΅ λΆμνμλ€. κ²°κ³Ό: μμ μ μ§λ¨λͺ
μΌλ‘ κ΅λ΄κ°λ§κ΅°μμλ μ¬μ΄μ, μμ
κ°λ§κ΅°μμλ κ°λ§νΌνμ΄ κ°μ₯ λ§μμΌλ ν΅κ³μ μ°¨μ΄λ μμλ€. κ°λ§μ΄μνΈλ³΄μ‘΄κΉμ§λ κ΅λ΄κ°λ§κ΅°μμ 8.9μκ°, μμ
κ°λ§κ΅°μμ 8.0μκ°μΌλ‘ μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμμΌλ, μ΄μκΉμ§λ κ΅λ΄κ°λ§κ΅°μμ 2.18μΌ, μμ
κ°λ§κ΅°μμ 4.98μΌλ‘ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνκ² μμ
κ°λ§κ΅°μμ κΈΈμλ€. μμ μ ν κ΅μ μλ ₯κ³Ό, κ°λ§ λ΄νΌμΈν¬ κ°μμ¨μ 3λ
κΉμ§ λͺ¨λ μκ°λμμ λ κ΅° κ° μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμμΌλ©°, μμ‘΄μ¨λ λ°±λ΄μ₯ μμ λλ° μ 무 λλ κ°λ§λΆμ’
μ§νκ³Όλ μκ΄μμ΄ μ μν μ°¨μ΄κ° μμλ€. κ²°λ‘ : λ³Έ κ²°κ³Όλ ν΄μΈκ³΅μ¬κ°λ§μ μ΄μ©ν μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ ν μμκ²°κ³Όκ° κ΅λ΄κ³΅μ¬κ°λ§μ μ΄μ©ν μ μΈ΅κ°λ§μ΄μμ κ³Ό λλ±ν μ ν¨μ±μ 보μμ μμ¬νλ€.
Purpose: To compare the survival of corneal grafts and the changes in endothelial cell density in penetrating keratoplasty using domestic or imported corneas.
Methods: Medical records of 236 eyes of 211 patients who underwent penetrating keratoplasty from November 2004 to August 2011 in Seoul National University Hospital and were followedup at least 1 year were retrospectively reviewed. After excluding the patients who received the combined surgeries with other surgeries except cataract surgery, the eyes were divided into 2 groups depending on the origin of donor tissue resulting in a domestic cornea group (108 eyes) and an imported cornea group (128 eyes). Recipient demographics, preoperative diagnosis, donor age, death-to-preservation time, death-to-operation time and pre-and postoperative visual acuities were compared between the 2 groups. Kaplan-Meier survival and changes in endothelial cell density were analyzed at 3, 6 and 12 months and then every year.
Results: The most common preoperative diagnoses were regraft and corneal opacity in the domestic and imported cornea groups, respectively, without statistical difference. Death-to-preservation time was 8.9 hours and 8.0 hours in the domestic and imported cornea groups, respectively, without statistical difference. However, death-to-operation time was longer in the imported cornea group (4.98 days) than in the domestic cornea group (2.18 days). There were no differences in pre- and postoperative visual acuities, decrease in annual changes in endothelial densities and survival up to 3 years between the 2 groups. In addition, the survival and decreased annual changes in endothelial densities were not different from each other in penetrating keratoplasty combined with cataract surgery or in penetrating keratoplasty for a corneal edema.
Conclusions: Our study results suggest that clinical outcomes of the penetrating keratoplasty using imported corneas are comparable in efficacy when compared with the clinical outcomes using domestic corneas.N
μ 2νγμ¬νμ κ²½μ μ°κ΅¬νγμν¬μ (μ‘λλ²,Jean-Pierre,μ΄μμ ,μ΅νμ§,λ°μ°¬μ,μ΄κ΄ν,μ‘°μ볡 μΈ)
μΆ©μ²λ¨λ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μμ±
μΆμ§ νν©
β
. 머리λ§
μ°λ¦¬λλΌμμ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ λν 본격μ μΈ κ΄μ¬μ κ°κ² λ κ²μ μ°Έμ¬μ λΆ μκΈ° λ
ΈλλΆ, κ΄κ³λΆμ², λ―Όκ°μ λ¬Έκ° λ±μ΄ μ€μ¬μ΄ λμ΄ 'μ¬νμ μΌμ리 T/Fν'μ ꡬμ±νλ©΄μ λΆν°μ΄λ€. μ΄λ₯Ό λ°νμΌλ‘ 'μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ‘μ±μμννΉλ³λ²'(2007λ
)μ μ μ νκ³
'μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ‘μ±κΈ°λ³Έκ³ν'(2008λ
)μ μ립νμ¬ 2012λ
κΉμ§ 1,000κ°μ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ‘μ±νκΈ° μν κΈ°λ³Έλ°©ν₯κ³Ό κ°μ’
μ§μλ°©μμ μ μνμλ€.
-μ΄ν μλ΅μ 2νγμ¬νμ κ²½μ μ°κ΅¬νγμν¬μ κ³ν
μΆ©μ²λ¨λ μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μμ±
μΆμ§νν© -μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
κ³Ό λ§μκΈ°μ
μ μ€μ¬μΌλ‘-
(μ‘λλ² μΆ©λ¨μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ§μμΌν°μ₯)
I.머리λ§
II.μΆ©λ¨νμ¬νμ κΈ°μ
λ° λ§μκΈ°μ
νν©
III.2011λ
μ μ²κΈ°μ
μ μ μ κ³Ό κ΄λ ¨ν λ¬Έμ μ
IV.2011λ
μΆ©λ¨ν μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ‘μ±κ³ν
V.ν₯ν μΆμ§κ³Όμ
μΊλλ€ νλ°±μ μ°λνλμ‘°ν©
'μ¬νμ κΈ°μ
μ μ΄λ»κ² μ¬νμ λͺ©μ κ³Ό κ²½μ μ λͺ©νλ₯Ό μ‘°νμμΌλΌ μ μμκΉ' (Jean-Pierre)
I.μλ¬Έ
II.νλ°± μ°λνλμ‘°ν©μ λ°°κ²½
μΊλλ€ νλ°±μ λ°©λ¬Έλ³΄κ³ (μ΄μμ ,μ΅νμ§,λ°μ°¬μ,μ΄κ΄ν,μ‘°μ볡 μΈ ν¨κ»μΌνλμ¬λ¨)
I.μ¬νμ κ²½μ μ 3κ°μ μΆ: νλ°±μ κ²½ν (1996~2007)
II.κΈ°κ΄λ°©