Theory of the Compilati on of the「Soktaejon」during the reign of King Y6ngjo and it s Characteristics

In this paper, I analyzed the theory of the Compilation of the Soktaejon during the Early Period of the 18th Century. The Soktaejon, which was compiled in 1746 (in the 22nd year of King Yongjo), on the surface appears to have been designed to cover all the legal changes which had taken place since the rKyongguk Taech5n J was compiled. However, from the standpoint of political thought and of the history of politics, the rSoktaejoru can also be regarded as having been based on the comprehensive efforts made by Choson society since the 17th century to stabilize the national order, and an effort to embed the new political mechanisms which were Ulldertaken during this period as part of the so-called Tangpyong politics within a code of laws. In compiling Soktaejon，King Yongjo was designed to secure the monarchmore his legitimacy in order to allow him to intervene and to impose compromises between the many factions which were then jostling for position. The Soktaejon was the result of these efforts to search for a new political management system, to strengthen the authority of the king and further the acceptance of constitutionalism. As such, the Soktaejon，as a complement to the Kyongguk Taechon，was meant to promote the usage of the Constitution as a more practical basis through which to rule the country. Once the authority of the Kyongguk Taechonu was laid out in the Constitution, the authority of the king，as the upholder of the Constitution, would be naturally strengthened

The system and characteristics of Sohak published during the Chosŏn Dynasty that the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies owns

은 주자학 학습을 위해 반드시 익혀야 하는 입문서였다. 朱熹는 聖學을 배우기 위해서는 을 익힌 후 을 학습한다는 경로를 제시, 이 두 책을 聖人의 이상적인 가르침에 접근하는 주요한 매체로 설정하였다. 배우는 순서와 단계가 달랐던 만큼 두 책의 성격 역시 달랐는데, 주희는 을 통해서는 일상의 灑掃·應對·進退의 예절과 禮·樂·射·御·書·數의 기예를 학습하며 으로는 窮理공부를 바탕으로 마음을 바르게 하고 사람을 다스리는 법을 배우기를 기대했다. 이 涵養공부를 염두에 둔다면 은 궁리 공부를 목표로 하는 책이라는 것이 주희의 생각이었다. 이처럼 주자학의 학습에서 과 은 위계적이고 순차적인 성격을 지니며 구별되었다. 하지만 은 초학의 교재를 넘어 일생동안 일상에서 활용해야 할 함양서이기도 했다.This paper examines the system and characteristics of various books relating to Sohak published during the Chosŏn Dynasty that the Kyujanggak Institute owns. Most of the books investigated in this paper were published or transcribed from the fifteenth century to the end of the nineteenth century. During the Chosŏn Dynasty, in order to help people learn 'Sohak', the three types of books were published and distributed at a national level: the original Sohak (wŏnmun Sohak), the commentary on Sohak (Sohak chuyŏksŏ), and the translation of Sohak (Sohak pŏnyŏksŏ). The Kyujanggak Institute or Korean Studies has most books regarding Sohak published during the Chosŏn Dynasty, such as the Sohakchipsŏng(小學集成) in the reign of King Sejong in the fifteenth century, the Pŏnyŏksohak(飜譯小學) in the reign of King Chungjong in the sixteenth century, and so forth. This paper is as part of the project of examining and investigating the data with regard to the study of Confucianism (Kyŏnghak) during the pre-modern period that the Kyujanggak Institute houses. This is regarded as primary materials to be used to understand individual characteristics or historical significance on numerous texts of Sohak in the Kyujanggak Institute for Korean Studies

16ㆍ7세기 『小學集註』의 成立과 刊行

This study analyzes the process through which the 〈Sohak chipju (小學集註, Collected Commentaries of Elementary Learning)〉 was compiled during the late 16th century, as well as the manner in which this work was disseminated within Chosŏn society from the late 17th century onwards. In addition, the historical significance of this book is also examined at length. The compilation of the 〈Sohak chipju〉 by Yi I(李珥) in 1579 was a significant event in the history of Chosŏn philosophy. Yi Is compilation of the 〈Sohak chipju〉 and subsequent widespread dissemination amongst the public made it possible for the people of Chosŏn to learn 〈Sohak(小學, Elementary Learning)〉 based on commentaries that differed from those found in the 〈Xiaoxuejicheng(小學集成)〉 annotated by He Shixin and in the 〈Xiaoxue jishuo(小學集說)〉 compiled by Cheng Yu of the Ming Dynasty. The 〈Sohak chipju〉 had several significant implications in terms of the history of Chosŏn philosophy. First, the 〈Sohak chipju〉 was the first annotation of 〈Sohak〉 to be summarized by a Chosŏn scholar. In this regard, Chosŏns sadaebu class had long been aware of the need to take steps to further entrench Confucianism within Chosŏn society. Second, the production of this book stands as proof positive of the vast academic capabilities of the Yi I School of Thought. To this end, neither the Yi Hwang nor the Sŏ Kyŏngdŏk School of Thought proved able to produce this kind of work. As such, the compilation of the 〈Sohak chipju〉 can be regarded as a significant tool with which to understand the academic differences between the Yi I School of Thought active in the Kiho area (covering Kyŏnggi, Hwanghae and Ch ungnam Provinces) and the other school of thoughts. Third, the compilation of the 〈Sohak chipju〉 was a sign that the Westerner (Sŏin) faction had reached the center of Chosŏns politics and philosophy. The 〈Sohak chipju〉 was not only a work which was regarded as being representative of the Westerner faction, but also contained many contents which this Westerner faction intended to disseminate throughout Chosŏn society. Reading this book allowed the people of Chosŏn to become aware of not only the tenets of Confucianism, but also of those promoted by Yi I

Acceptance and Its Attitude in Joseon Society toward Foreign Culture in the Late 18th Century : Centering on <κyujang chongmok( 奎훌總目 )>

17.8세기 조선 학계의 학술 · 지식은 이전 시기에 비한다면 상상할 수 없을 청 도로 풍부해지고 다양해졌다. 이같은 변화가 얼어난 데에는 여러 요인이 있을 수 있지만， 우선 15세기 이래 축적된 조선 학계의 학문 성과가 여러 학파와 정파의 성장 속에 확장되는 사청을 거론할 수 있다. 16세기 중 · 후반부터 본격적으로 이 루어지는 徐敬德， 李混， 홈植， 李쩍와 같은 학지들과 그들 후학들의 학파적 활통은 성리학에 대한 이해를 비롯 현실 인식과 정치 운영의 방식을 둘러싸고 아주 다양 한 논리와 견해를 만들며 전개되었다. 과거 조선의 ξL문 풍토가 정리되고 새로운 상황에 걸맞는 적절한 사유가 적극 모색되었다. 물론 이 과정이 순탄하게 평화롭 게 이루어지는 것은 아니 었다. 각 학파별로 지향이 다르고 생각이 다른 만큼 학파 상호간의 활동에는 팽팽한 긴장과 길항이 항존했으며， 그리하여 그것이 정치적인 문제와 얽히면 격렬한 정쟁으로 폭벌하기도 했다 1) 하지만， 여러 학파의 경쟁적 활동이 이 시기 지식 세계를 확장하논 주된 힘으로 작용한 것은 분병했다.IiKyz;ang chongmok.J is the possession list and summary collection of Chinese books, which are being owned by Kyujanggak(奎章聞). About 700 kinds of books, which were published in the Ming and Qing 며nasty， are arranged with four paπ classification system. Compilers of Ii Kyujang chongmok.J arranged by abbreviating basic information that an individual book has, and gave strict criticism at the same time to books, which contain idea of being likely a threat to ]oseon socieψ. Especially as for books of having a method available for destroying the boundary between Zhuzixue(朱子學) and Yangmingxue(陽明學) and books of having aimed to deconstruct the Thought of Zhuzi, they showed decisiveness that cannot be seen anywhere. Ii Kyujang chongmokjj was the result that ]oseon society selected in the late 18th century with the aim of having aggregated new knowledge and made medium in public communication at the point available for controlling optimally with being helped ]oseon in changing and expanding. In such sense, the existence of this book was ever barometer available for definitely examining the world of consciousness in ]oseon govemment, which had aimed to define the boundaJγ to some extent with controlling and managing dangerous knowledge elements amid the book even while accepting new book, which is conducive to administering the govemment. The aggregation of knowledge that Ii K;μJjang chongmokjj has and one aspeα in controlling the thought accompanied by it werent certainly those that came just from the king ]eongjo. It had been intervened simultaneously a burning desire in Yangban( 兩班) intellects who had strived to firmly keep the world of Zhuzixue. A method or directionality that Joseon intellects in the 19th century meet and digest new knowledge and culture will be probably integrated in this book.이 논문은 2008년 정부(교육과학기술부)의 재원으로 한국연구재단의 지원을 받아 수행된 연구임 (NRF깅 008-36 1 -A0007

조선후기 『화담집』 간행의 추이와 서경덕 학문

이 논문은 규장각한국학연구원 인문한국사업단 제32회 HK워크숍 조선의 기록문화(2018.05.24)에서 발표된 내용을 수정․보완한 것임.In this article, I investigated the circumstances in Seo-Gyungduk(徐敬德)s book Hwadam-Jip(花潭集) published in Korea several times, focusing on composition of publications, publishers and publication period. Hwadam-Jip was published five times by the end of the 18th century when it was published for the first time after Seo-Gyungduks Death. Personality in the book, word composition method, contents of recording, publishing place, publisher, etc. have changed every time. Initial publication was led by Seo-Gyungduk"s disciples and the people connected with them, and later publications were led by scholars in the Gaesong(開成) area. Such a change is deeply related to the declining of northern scholars, growth of the Gaesong region scholarship. The paper of this time is the minimum navigation for Hwadam-Jip publication which lasted five times. From the 19th century, how was the evaluation of Seo-Gyungduk in the academic and cultural world of Gaeseong, how Hwadam-Jip was utilized, and how such evaluation and utilization had power I would like to set aside a future task