7 research outputs found

    RNA editing modulates the transcriptional repression activity of CtBP1

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ์˜๊ณผํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 8. ์œคํ™๋•.RNA modification includes alternative splicing and RNA editing, which increases the diversity of transcripts and proteins. The C-terminal binding protein (CtBP), a transcriptional corepressor, has alternative splicing forms but there is no information about involving RNA editing in CtBP function. Here we found a unique transcript variant of CtBP1 with an A-to-G conversion at codon 528 in breast cancer cell lines. CtBP1 mRNA editing produces protein in which threonine-176 is changed into alanine. This CtBP1 (T176A) mutant lacks in vitro dehydrogenase activity and dimerization ability compared with wild-type CtBP1. Microarray analysis showed that many oncogenes were upregulated in CtBP-knockout mouse embryonic fibroblast. These candidate target genes were repressed by restoring wild-type CtBP1, but not by CtBP1 (T176A) mutant, indicating that CtBP1 (T176A) mutant is defective in transcriptional repression activity. We propose that RNA editing modulates the role of CtBP1 in transcription repression of oncogenes involved in breast cancer cells.ABSTRACT โ…ฐ TABLE OF CONTENTS โ…ฑ LIST OF FIGURES โ…ฒ LIST OF TABLES โ…ณ ABBREVIATIONS โ…ด INTRODUCTION 1 MATERIALS AND METHODS 3 Cell culture and transfection 3 Plasmids 3 RNA editing analysis 3 Immunofluorescent staining 4 Protein purifications 4 In vitro GST-pull down assay 5 Dehydrogenase activity assay 5 Microarray analysis 5 RNA purification and quantitative real-time PCR 6 Lentivirus-based shRNA 6 Chromatin immunoprecipitation 7 Primers 7 RESULTS 10 1. CtBP1 mRNA editing in breast cancer cell lines 10 2. The characteristics of an edited CtBP1 protein 14 3. The change of gene expression patterns by CtBP in mouse embryonic fibroblast 19 4. Transcriptional repression activity of edited CtBP1 25 DISCUSSION 31 REFERENCES 34 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ์ดˆ๋ก 40Maste

    Studies on some mechanisms of the enzyme secretion of exocrine pancreas in dogs

    No full text
    ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] [์˜๋ฌธ] Pavlov and his associates (1888, 1893) developed experimental technics for the study of pancreatic secretion and demonstrated that stimulation of the peripheral ends of vagus nerve caused a flow of Pancreatic juice from pancreatic fistula in the unanesthetized dog, but failed to obtain similar results in acute experiments. Pavlov interpreted that vagi convey two kind of fibers to the pancreas, excitatory and inhibitory. Further he concluded that both vasoconstrictor and secretory fibers to the pancreas were present in the sympathetics. Popielski (1901), and lately Thomas (1950) has proposed a concept that local reflexes meditated through the intrinsic ganglion of the pancreas and the enteric plexus, or through the sympathetic ganglia, play in the response of the pancreas to excitants, particularly, those which increase enzyme output. On the basis of animal and human experiment Hong et al (1956, 1961) postulated the Possibility that a role of the local nerves suggested by Thomas (1950) is to release pancreas stimulating hormones from the duodenum. In order to access the role of local reflex in the regulation of enzyme secretion of the pancreas, author has studied the effects of a potent muscarinic ganglionic stimulant and its blockade or other related agents on pancreatic secretion in the presence of a secretin background in wish chloralose anesthetized dogs. Dogs between 8 and 16 kg were anesthetized with chloralose, approximately 60 mg/kg in propylene glycol after prime thiopental anesthesia (25 mg/kg). The abdominal cavity was opened, the main pancreatic duct cannulated end the accessory duct ligated. A tribe inserted into stomach for drain of gastric juice or the pylorus was ligated. All agents were injected intravenously through the polyethylene tube put in femoral vein. Seoretin (Jorpes and Mutt preparation) was infused throughout the experiment. Other agents are as follows; epinephrine and norepinephrine, new ganglionic stimulants: McN-A-343 and AHR-602, and SKF-525-A which is known to Potentiates the action of the various drugs, and ganglionic blocking agents: atropine and hexamethonium. Pancreatic juice in the presence of a secretin background was collected since there is very little flow of pancreatic juice in the fasted anesthetized dog. The pancreatic amylase, lipase and trypsin were measured by the methods previously described(Hong, 1967). Summary In dogs with chloralose anesthesia following a prime dose of thiopental the secretory response of pancreatic enzyme to secretin was studied by means of some agents active at autonomic ganglionic sites and obtained the following results. 1. Both epinephrine and norepinephrine reduced the volume response to secretin by the raising dose, however, the enzyme output was moderately increased only by the latter. 2. SKF-525-A increased the enzyme content in secretin juice. 3. Both AHR-602 and McH-A-343, muscarinic ganglionic stimulants increased the enzyme content of secretin juice and particularly the latter was a potent stimulant of enzyme secretion. 4. Both atropine and hexamethonium significantly reduced the pancreatic response to SKF-525-A, AHR-602 and McN-A-343, however, the former is more susceptible of enzyme response and the latter was of volume response. By these results it is concluded that pancreatic secretion can be elicited in part through autonomic ganglionic sites which are sensitive to both atropine and hexamethonium. However, the response of enzyme is more depend on atropine sensitive receptors and the volume response is on hexamethonium-sensitive sites. Consequently it is felt that the local reflex mechanists may explain in some extent the enzyme secretion of the pancreas, whereas, the ganglionic sites responsible for enzyme secretion appears to be cholinergic nature of atropine specific.restrictio

    (The) relationship between post operative perceived health status, health-related quality of life and pre oper

    No full text
    ์ค‘ํ™˜์ž๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ ์ „๊ณต/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€]๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ด€์ƒ๋™๋งฅ ์šฐํšŒ์ˆ  ํ›„ 4๊ฐœ์›”์—์„œ 8๊ฐœ์›”์ด ์ง€๋‚œ ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„, ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์˜ ์ •๋„์™€ ์ด๋“ค๊ฐ„์˜ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•œ ์„œ์ˆ ์ , ํšก๋‹จ์  ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ์„œ ๊ด€์ƒ๋™๋งฅ ์šฐํšŒ์ˆ  ํ™˜์ž์˜ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ธฐ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ๊ด€๋ฆฌ์— ๊ธฐ์ดˆ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ 2006๋…„ 4์›” 1์ผ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 2006๋…„ 6์›” 5์ผ ๊นŒ์ง€ ๊ฒฝ๊ธฐ๋„ ์†Œ์žฌ์˜ ์ผ ๋Œ€ํ•™๋ณ‘์›์—์„œ ๊ด€์ƒ๋™๋งฅ ์šฐํšŒ์ˆ ์„ ๋ฐ›๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ 4๊ฐœ์›”์—์„œ 8๊ฐœ์›”์˜ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ฒฝ๊ณผํ•œ 61๋ช…์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” SPSS for window 12.0 ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ํ†ต๊ณ„(์‹ค์ˆ˜, ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ, ํ‰๊ท ๊ณผ ํ‘œ์ค€ํŽธ์ฐจ, ์ค‘๊ฐ„๊ฐ’), ANOVA, Pearson correlation coefficient๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ์–ป์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค.1. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๋Š” ์˜ˆ์ธก์‚ฌ๋ง ์œ„ํ—˜๊ณผ ์˜ˆ์ธก๋‡Œ์กธ์ค‘ ์œ„ํ—˜์ด ์ง์—…์œ ๋ฌด, ๊ฒฐํ˜ผ์ƒํƒœ, ๋ฐฐ์šฐ์ž ์œ ๋ฌด, ๋™๊ฑฐํ˜•ํƒœ, ์ฃผ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ œ๊ณต์ž, ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋น„ ๋ถ€๋‹ด์ž์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ฐจ์ด๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค(p<0.05).2. ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ์ง์—…์ด ์žˆ๊ณ  ํšŒ๋ณต๊ธฐ ๊ต์œก์ด ๋„์›€์ด ๋œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05).3. ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ด€๋ จ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์œ„ํ—˜์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํก์—ฐ, ๊ธ‰์„ฑ ์‹ฌ๊ทผ๊ฒฝ์ƒ‰์„ ์ง„๋‹จ ๋ฐ›์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์™€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ๋Œ€๋™๋งฅ ๋‚ด ํ’์„ ํŽŒํ”„(IABP)๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์น˜ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๊ณ  ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ฃผ์š”ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๋Š” ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ NYHA functional class์˜ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๋ถ๋ฏธ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„ ํ‰๊ฐ€๋„๊ตฌ(NNERS)์˜ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ธ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋„ ์œ ์ง€๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์ค‘ํ™˜์ž์‹ค ์ฒด๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์žฌ์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์—ˆ๋‹ค(p<0.05).4. ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ด€๋ จ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์œ„ํ—˜์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ํก์—ฐ, ์ขŒ์‹ฌ์‹ค ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋ถ€์ „(์ขŒ์‹ฌ์‹ค ๊ตฌํ˜ˆ๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ), ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ๋Œ€๋™๋งฅ ๋‚ด ํ’์„ ํŽŒํ”„(IABP)๋ฅผ ๊ฑฐ์น˜ํ–ˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์—์„œ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ฃผ์š” ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ NYHA functional class์˜ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ์‹ฌํ• ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋‚ฎ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ธ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋„ ์œ ์ง€๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์ค‘ํ™˜์ž์‹ค ์ฒด๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์žฌ์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ๋Š” ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05).5. ์งˆ๋ณ‘ ๋ฐ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๊ด€๋ จ ํŠน์„ฑ์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์œ„ํ—˜์š”์ธ ์ค‘ ์ขŒ์‹ฌ์‹ค ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ๋ถ€์ „์ด ์žˆ๋˜ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ(์ขŒ์‹ฌ์‹ค ๊ตฌํ˜ˆ๋ฅ ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ)์—์„œ ๋‚ฎ๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. NYHA functional class์˜ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ฃผ์š” ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํƒ€ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ์ด ๋ฐœ์ƒํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์ด ๋‚ฎ์€ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ณด์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ธ๊ณต๊ธฐ๋„ ์œ ์ง€๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์ค‘ํ™˜์ž์‹ค ์ฒด๋ฅ˜๊ธฐ๊ฐ„, ์žฌ์›๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์ด ๊ธธ์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05).6. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ์™€ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค(p<0.05).7. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„์ˆ˜๋ก ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์€ ๋†’์•˜๋‹ค(p=0.000).8. ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ธฐ์— ๊ฒฝํ—˜ํ•˜๋Š” ์‹ ์ฒด์  ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ฌธ์ œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์Šด์ ˆ๊ฐœ์„ ์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ, ๋‹ค๋ฆฌ ๋ฐ ํŒ”์˜ ์ ˆ๊ฐœ์„ ์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ, ๋“ฑ, ๋ชฉ, ์–ด๊นจ์˜ ๋ถˆํŽธ๊ฐ, ์‹์š•๋ถ€์ง„, ์ˆ˜๋ฉด์žฅ์•  ์–ด์ง€๋Ÿฌ์›€, ์ˆจ์ฐฌ ์ฆ์ƒ์ด ์žˆ์—ˆ๊ณ  ์‹ฌ๋ฆฌ์  ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๋ฌธ์ œ๋กœ๋Š” ์šฐ์šธ, ๋ถˆ์•ˆ, ์ž์กด๊ฐ ์ €ํ•˜, ์ŠคํŠธ๋ ˆ์Šค ๋“ฑ์„ ํ˜ธ์†Œํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค.์ด์ƒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ๊ด€์ƒ๋™๋งฅ ์šฐํšŒ์ˆ  ํ™˜์ž์˜ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„๋Š” ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ๊ณผ ์ƒ๊ด€๊ด€๊ณ„๋ฅผ ๋ณด์ด๋ฏ€๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„ ๋ถ„๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์‹œํ–‰ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ค‘์ฆ๋„์˜ ํŠน์„ฑ ๋ฐ ์ •๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ํ•ฉ๋ณ‘์ฆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ๋ฐ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ๋‹จ์ถ•์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ค‘์žฌ๊ฐ€ ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ์ „ ํšŒ๋ณต๊ธฐ ๊ต์œก์ด ์ˆ˜์ˆ  ํ›„ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์ƒํƒœ ๋ฐ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•๊ด€๋ จ ์‚ถ์˜ ์งˆ์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ๊ต์œก ์š”๊ตฌ๋„์— ๋”ฐ๋ฅธ ๊ต์œก ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ๊ณผ ์ฐจ๋ณ„ํ™”๋œ ์–‘์งˆ์˜ ๊ต์œก์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์ด๋Ÿฌํ•œ ์ธก๋ฉด์—์„œ ์‹ฌํ˜ˆ๊ด€๊ณ„ ์ „๋ฌธ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์‚ฌ์˜ ์—ญํ•  ๋ฐ ๊ธฐ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ฐœํœ˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๊ธฐ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋Œ€ํ•œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]The purpose of the study was to exam the relationship between post operative perceived health status & health related quality of life and pre operative disease severity in patients undergone Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting.This is descriptive and cross-section correlative study to see the relationship between post operative perceived health status & health related quality of life and pre operative disease severity in CABG patients.This study has been done from April 1, 2006 to June 5, 2006 in one university hospital in Geyonggi-Do. Total 61 patients having had the CABG with 4 months to 8 months of duration after surgery have been participated for this study.Collected data has been analyzed using SPSS for window 12.0 program with descriptive statistics (the real number, percentage, average, standard deviation and mid-point), ANOVA and Pearson correlation coefficient.The results of the study are as follows;1. The higher the degree of serious illness before surgery is, the lower the perceptive health status after surgery is (p<0.05).2. The higher the degree of serious illness before surgery is, the lower the health related quality of life after surgery is (p<0.05).3. The higher the condition of the perceptive health status after surgery is, the higher the health related quality of life is (p=0.000).4. Physical health problems during recovery phase after surgery were discomfort of chest incision line, discomfort of leg & arm incision lines, discomfort of back, neck, shoulder, lack of appetite, sleeping problem, dizziness, being short of breath. Psychological problems were depression, anxiousness, self-esteem decline and stress.In conclusion, there were significant relationship between of post operative perceived health status & health related quality of life and pre operative disease severity in patients undergone CABG. These results suggest that nursing intervention is needed according to the characteristics and degrees of the seriousness for complication prevention and shortening convalescence. In addition, as the education about convalescence before surgery affects on perceptive health status and health related quality of life, it is needed to develop an education program reflecting patientsโ€™ demand and to offer differentiated and good quality education. Thus, the cardiovascular nurse specialist and/or nurse practitioner should develop the educational program in the post operative management of CABG patients.ope
    corecore