24 research outputs found
19μΈκΈ° κ³ λμμ€μ°κ΅¬ : κ΄΄λ¬Όμ±, 곡ν¬, μ§μμ κ΄κ³λ₯Ό μ€μ¬μΌλ‘
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μμ΄μλ¬Ένκ³Ό,2000.Maste
μλ΄μμ μ΄λ‘ μ λ°°κ²½μ λ°λ₯Έ μλ΄μ κ°μ μλ λΉκ΅ μ°κ΅¬
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :κ΅μ‘νκ³Ό κ΅μ‘μλ΄μ 곡,1998.Maste
A Iongitudinal study of the relationships between family environment and intellectual development and academic achievement
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :κ΅μ‘νκ³Ό,1999.Docto
(A) study on the health promotion needs in company employees
μ§μμ¬ν κ°νΈνκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μΌ μ§μ₯ μ§μμ 건κ°μ¦μ§ μꡬλ₯Ό νμ
νκ³ κ·Έ κ΄κ³μ λΆμμ ν΅νμ¬ μ§μ₯λ΄ κ±΄κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ νμν κΈ°μ΄μλ£λ₯Ό μ 곡νκΈ° μν μ‘°μ¬μ°κ΅¬μ΄λ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ λμμ μΌ μ§μ₯μ 근무νλ μ μ§μ μ€ λΆμΆ©λΆν μλ£λ₯Ό μ μΈν 225λͺ
μ΄μκ³ , μλ£μμ§κΈ°κ°μ 1999λ
6μ 15μΌ λΆν° 6μ 25μΌ κΉμ§ μ€μνμλ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ λꡬλ κΉμμμΈ(1996)κ° κ°λ°ν ꡬ쑰νλ μκ°λ³΄κ³ ν μ§λ¬Έμ§λ₯Ό κΈ°λ³ΈμΌλ‘ μ°κ΅¬μκ° λ¬Ένκ³ μ°°μ ν΅νμ¬ μμ 보μν μ§λ¬Έμ§λ₯Ό μ¬μ©νμκ³ , μμ§λ μλ£λ SPSS Windowλ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμ¬ μ μ°μ²λ¦¬νμμΌλ©° κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
1. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μΈκ΅¬μ¬ννμ νΉμ±μ λ¨μκ° 79.6%, μ¬μκ° 20.4%λ‘ λ¨μκ° λ§μμΌλ©°, μ°λ Ήμ 21μΈμμ 58μΈ κΉμ§λ‘ νκ· μ°λ Ήμ 36.5μΈ μλ€.
κ΅μ‘μμ€μ κ³ μ‘Έμ΄μμ΄ 99.6%λ‘ λμ κ΅μ‘μμ€μ 보μμΌλ©°, κΈ°νΌμ΄ 81.3%μ΄λ©°, 49.7%κ° μ’
κ΅λ₯Ό κ°μ§κ³ μμλ€.
2. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μΈμ§λ 건κ°μνλ λμ²΄λ‘ κ±΄κ°νλ€κ° 47.1%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μλ€.
3. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ 건κ°νμλ ν‘μ°μ¨μ΄ 47.1%μκ³ , μμ£Όμ¨μ 81.6%μ΄μλ€.
μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μ΄λμ λλ 12.9%κ° μ£Ό 3-4ν μ΄μ, 28.0%κ° μ£Ό1-2ν μ΄λνκ³ μμμΌλ©°, 59.1%κ° μ΄λμ κ±°μ μνκ³ μμλ€.
4. λμμμ μ§μ
μ νΉμ±μΌλ‘ 근무λ
μκ° 10-14λ
μ΄ 24.8%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μμΌλ©°, μ
무λ§μ‘±λλ 보ν΅μ κ²½μ°κ° 48.4%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μκ³ , λ§μ‘±νλ κ²½μ°κ° 39.1%μκ³ , λΆλ§μ‘±νλ κ²½μ°κ° 12.4%μλ€.
5. 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ λν μꡬλλ κ°μ₯ λμ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ μ΄λνλ‘κ·Έλ¨(73.3%)μ΄μμΌλ©°, λ€μμ μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬(60.4%), 체μ€μ‘°μ λ° κ΄λ¦¬(40.0%), μμλ°©(35.1%), κΈμ°(25.8%), λΉλ¨(15.6%), κ³ νμ(13.8%), μ μ£Ό(12.9%)μ μμ΄μλ€.
6. 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ λν μ°Έμ¬μλλ κ°μ₯ λμ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ μ΄λ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨(63.1%)μ΄μμΌλ©°, λ€μμ μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬(54.7%), 체μ€μ‘°μ λ° κ΄λ¦¬(32.9%), μμλ°©(32.9%), κΈμ°(22.7%), λΉλ¨(15.1%), κ³ νμ(11.1%), μ μ£Ό(9.8%)μμ΄μλ€.
7. 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μꡬλμ ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνκ² μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈλ€μ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
λλΆλΆμ λμμλ€μ΄ μ΄λμ΄λ μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨κ³Ό κ°μ΄ μ λ°μ μΈ κ±΄κ°μ¦μ§μ λͺ©μ μΌλ‘ νλ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μνκ³ μμμΌλ©°, μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬, 체μ€μ‘°μ λ° κ΄λ¦¬, κ³ νμκ΄λ¦¬, κΈμ° νλ‘κ·Έλ¨κ³Ό κ°μ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨λ€μ μμ΄μ μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λ, κ³Όλ€μ²΄μ€, κ³ νμ, ν‘μ°κ³Ό κ°μ 건κ°μνμμλ€μ μ€μ λ‘ κ°μ§κ³ μλ λμμλ€μκ² κ±΄κ°μνμμμ κ΄λ ¨λ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μꡬλκ° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνκ² λνλ¬λ€.
μ΄μμ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό ν λλ‘ μ°μ
μ₯ 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μ€μνκΈ° μ΄μ μ κ·Όλ‘μμ 건κ°μνμμΈ, 건κ°νμ λ³ν λ±μ νμ
νμ¬ νμλ³ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ λμμ κ·λͺ¨λ₯Ό νμ
νλ κ²μ΄ νμμ μ΄λ€.
[μλ¬Έ]
This study was designed to assess of need for health promotion program for people who are actively employed.
The research design used was a descriptive investigation study. Health status and health promotion behavior of the employees were accessed, and factors influencing in their health promotion needs were analyzed. The subjects for this study were 225 employees from a company in Seoul.
The data were collected from June 15 to 25, 1999 using a self-administrative questionnaire developed by Euisook Kim et al.(1996) and revised through studing reference.
Analysis of the data was done using the SAS windows. The results of the analysis are as follows;
1. The majority of the subjects were men(79.6%), with a mean age of 36.5 years (range : 21 - 58), having high school graduation or higher (99.6%), married (81.3%) and with 49.7% reporting religious affiliation.
2. For perceived health status the majority of the subjects reported a moderately healthy status (47.1%).
3. Health related behavior of subjects included smoking 47.1%, drinking alcohol 81.6%, regular exercise 3 to 4 times or more a week 12.9%. exercise once or twice a week 28.0%, no exercise 59.1%.
4. The highest frequency for length of employment was 10-14years in the company (24.8%) and 48.4% of the subject were moderately satisfied with their jobs, 39.1% were satisfied and 12.4% of subjects were dissatisfied.
5. Among the types of health promotion programs, an exercise program(58.4%) was what the subjects needed the most, followed by a stress management program(60.4%) weight control program(40.0%), cancer prevention program(35.1%), smoking cessation program(25.8%), diabetic melitus management program(15.1%), hypertension management program(13.8%), and a program to control alcohol consumption(12.9%).
6. Among the types of health promotion programs, an exercise program(63.1%) was the program that the subjects indicated the highest intent for participation, followed by a stress management program(54.7%), weight control program(32.9%), cancer
prevention program(32.9%), smoking cessation program(22.7%), diabetic melitus management program(15.1%), hypertension management program(11.1%) and a program to control alcohol consumption (12.9%).
7. The statistically significant factors indicating a need for health promotion program were as follows;
1) The need for a stress management program, because there was statistical significance in the stress symptom scores.
2) The need for a weight control program, because there was statistical significance for Body Mass Index.
3) The need for a hypertension management program, because there were more people with hypertension were than with normotension (p=0.001).
4) The need for a smoking cessation program, because men had higher smoking rates than women(p=0.001) and there were more people who smoked than did not (p=0.001).
5) The need for a program to control alcohol consumption, because there were non drinkers than drinkers.ope
μ΄μ κ³Ό μλμ λ°±κ³Όμ¬μ μΌλ‘μμγμλμ 120μΌγ
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(μμ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :λΆμ΄λΆλ¬Ένκ³Ό λΆλ¬Έν μ 곡,2001.Maste