50 research outputs found

    An Integrative Critical Incident Approach to Quality Management in the Smartphone Market: Product, Service, and Content

    Get PDF
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (์„์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ฒฝ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ, 2012. 8. ์˜ค์ •์„.The explosive growth of the smartphone market and furious competition among global IT (Information Technology) leaders necessitate a better understanding of consumers quality perceptions of smartphones, their related services, and contents. In this study, a critical incident approach to quality perception and management is utilized to investigate how the quality of a smartphone device, product-related services, telecommunications services, and application contents influences owner intentions of future purchases. Specifically, critical incidents that smartphone owners may confront are hypothesized to engage in forming their satisfaction level or quality perceptions of smartphones, affecting their likelihood of future purchases with regard to the three major smartphone supply chain parties: the mobile device manufacturer, the telecommunications carrier and the application content provider. The proposed model was empirically examined by regression analyses of 795 smartphone users responses. The results can be summarized as follows: Smartphone owners are affected by the critical incidents associated with their smartphones which they experienced during the ownership cyclethe owners overall quality perceptions of smartphones are influenced by the critical incidents related to phone device, product-related services, telecommunication services, and application contentsthe specific critical incident categories that significantly have an effect on each smartphone supply chain party differ with each other. Additionally, quality management through monitoring and managing critical incidents during the ownership period is verified to applicable in smartphone market in order to enhance quality perceptions of customers, leading to business prosperity as well as better quality design of smartphone products and services. Keywords: Critical IncidentQuality ManagementIntegrative ApproachSupply Chain ManagementSmartphone1. Introductionโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ.โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ...โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ5 2. Smartphone marketโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ.................................9 3. Literature reviewโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ...โ€ฆ.....12 4. A framework for evaluating owner perceptions of smartphone quality................14 4.1. Data collection โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..โ€ฆ...โ€ฆโ€ฆ...20 4.2. Independent and dependent variablesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..23 5. Data analysisโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ...โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ25 5.1. The impact of critical incidents on the smartphones overall qualityโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ26 5.2. The impact of critical incidents on the owners future intentionsโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..29 5.3. Implicationโ€ฆ.โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ38 6. Conclusion..โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ..โ€ฆ..โ€ฆ.42 Referencesโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ...45 ๊ตญ๋ฌธ ์ดˆ๋กโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ.โ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆโ€ฆ.51Maste

    The cost-effectiveness of bisphosphonates in the treatment of postmenopausal osteoporosis of women in Korea

    No full text
    ๋ณ‘์›๊ฒฝ์˜ํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ชฉ์ : ์ด์ „ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†๋Š” ํ๊ฒฝ ํ›„ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ํ™˜์ž(T scoreโ‰ค -2.5SD)์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ํˆฌ์—ฌ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์—ฐ๋ น๋ณ„๋กœ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•œ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•: ์ด ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋งˆ๋ฅด์ฝ”ํ”„-์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ ๋ชจํ˜•(Markov-Cohort Model)์„ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ตญ๋‚ด์—์„œ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋นˆ๋ฒˆํžˆ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ๋กœ ์‚ฌ์šฉ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋Š” ๋น„์Šคํฌ์Šคํฌ๋„ค์ดํŠธ ์ค‘ ์•Œ๋ Œ๋“œ๋กœ๋„ค์ดํŠธ ๋˜๋Š” ๋ฆฌ์ œ๋“œ๋กœ๋„ค์ดํŠธ๋ฅผ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ๋กœ ํˆฌ์—ฌํ•œ ๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๊ทธ๋ ‡์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๊ตฐ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๊ณ , ๋ถ„์„๊ด€์ ์€ ๋ณดํ—˜์ž ๊ด€์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ถ„์„๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 1000๋ช…์˜ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ํ™˜์ž๋“ค์ด ์•ฝ๋ฌผ์„ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ์‹œ์ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ๋‚˜์ด๊ฐ€ 100์„ธ๊ฐ€ ๋˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์‚ฌ๋งํ•  ๋•Œ๊นŒ์ง€๋กœ ์„ค์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. 70์„ธ๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ถ„์„์œผ๋กœ ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋‚˜์ด๋ณ„๋กœ(60์„ธ, 65์„ธ, 70์„ธ, 75์„ธ, 80์„ธ, 85์„ธ) 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ชจ๋ธ์— ํฌํ•จ๋œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์€ ๊ณ ๊ด€์ ˆ ๊ณจ์ ˆ, ์ฒ™์ถ” ๊ณจ์ ˆ, ์†๋ชฉ ๊ณจ์ ˆ 3๊ฐ€์ง€์ด๋‹ค. ๋ฌธํ—Œ ๊ฒ€ํ† ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ํ™˜์ž์—์„œ์˜ ๊ณจ์ ˆ์˜ ๋ฐœ์ƒ์œจ, ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋น„์šฉ(์ž…์›, ์™ธ๋ž˜), ์•ฝ์ œ๋น„์šฉ, ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๋ฐœ์ƒ ์‹œ ๊ฐ์†Œ๋œ ํšจ์šฉ, ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ตญ๋‚ด ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์ˆ˜์ง‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 5๋…„, ์•ฝ์ œ์˜ ์ž”๋ฅ˜ํšจ๊ณผ(residual effect)๋Š” 5๋…„์œผ๋กœ ๊ฐ€์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ์ˆœ์‘๋„๋ฅผ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ ๊ฑด์ˆ˜, ์—ฐ์žฅ๋œ ์งˆ ๋ณด์ • ์ˆ˜์ •(quality-adjusted life-years, QALYs)๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋น„์šฉ๊ณผ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋Š” ์—ฐ๊ฐ„ 5%ํ• ์ธ์œจ์„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ: ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ (์ด์ „ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ๊ฒฝํ—˜์ด ์—†์œผ๋ฉฐ, 70์„ธ์— ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ์—ฌ์„ฑ ํ™˜์ž) ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, QALY์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์ฆ์  ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ๋น„(incremental cost-effectiveness ratio, ICER)๋Š” 35,292,823์›/QALY์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. 80์„ธ์— ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น„์šฉ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ (ICER=23,885,022์›/QALY), 60์„ธ์— ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ(152,769,476์›/QALY) ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๊ธฐ๋ณธ ๋ถ„์„(์•ฝ๋ฌผ ํˆฌ์—ฌ์‹œ์ : 70์„ธ)์—์„œ ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ ์ฆ์  ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ๋น„(ICER)๋Š” 11,769,688์›/one averted Fx์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๊ณจ์ ˆ ์˜ˆ๋ฐฉ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ICER๋Š” 75์„ธ์— ์•ฝ๋ฌผํˆฌ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์—ˆ๊ณ (10,732,892์›/one averted Fx), 60์„ธ์— ์•ฝ๋ฌผ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์ด ๋‚ฎ์•˜๋‹ค(47,318,663์›/one averted Fx). ๋Œ€์ฒด์ ์œผ๋กœ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ ์‹œ์ž‘ ์—ฐ๋ น์ด ๋†’์•„์งˆ์ˆ˜๋ก ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒฝํ–ฅ์„ ๋ณด์˜€๋‹ค. ๊ธฐ๋ณธ๋ถ„์„์„ ๊ธฐ์ค€์œผ๋กœ ํ•œ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ๋„ ๋ถ„์„์—์„œ๋Š” ๋ณธ ๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ์™€ ์•ฝ์ œ ํˆฌ์—ฌ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๊ฐ€ ๋ฏผ๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋ณ€ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ์—ˆ๋‹ค.๊ฒฐ ๋ก : ๋งˆ๋ฅด์ฝ”ํ”„-์ฝ”ํ˜ธํŠธ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ์ œ์˜ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์„ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ, ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ์‹œ์ ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ์ด ๋‹ค๋ฅด๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ ์ˆ˜์šฉ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์ด 3,000๋งŒ์›/QALY์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ, 75์„ธ ์ด์ƒ์—์„œ ๊ณจ๋‹ค๊ณต์ฆ ์น˜๋ฃŒ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ๊ตฐ์—์„œ ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ๋น„์šฉ-ํšจ๊ณผ์„ฑ ์ˆ˜์šฉ ์ž„๊ณ„๊ฐ’์ด 4,000๋งŒ์›/QALY ์ด์ƒ์ธ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ 70์„ธ ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๋ น์—์„œ ๋น„์šฉํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ธ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค.restrictio

    ์„ฑ๋Šฅ์„ ๋ณด์žฅํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ๊ฐ•์ธํ•œ ๋ฌผ์ฒด ์ถ”์  ์•Œ๊ณ ๋ฆฌ์ฆ˜๊ณผ ๋กœ๋ด‡ ๋„ค๋น„๊ฒŒ์ด์…˜

    No full text
    ํ•™์œ„๋…ผ๋ฌธ (๋ฐ•์‚ฌ)-- ์„œ์šธ๋Œ€ํ•™๊ต ๋Œ€ํ•™์› : ๊ณต๊ณผ๋Œ€ํ•™ ์ „๊ธฐยท์ปดํ“จํ„ฐ๊ณตํ•™๋ถ€, 2018. 2. ์˜ค์„ฑํšŒ.Research on mobile robot includes a wide range of research elds such as path planning, target tracking, and navigation. Since these elds deal with the fundamental and necessary technologies for mobile robots, they have been actively investigated for a long period of time. Nonetheless, such algorithms have not been sufficiently developed to deploy the robot in the real environments, since the real world is uncontrolled, complicated and variable. The complex environments generate various uncertainties which can result in different consequences from the intent of the algorithm. Hence, uncertainties can lead to failure of navigation algorithms which do not take uncertainties into account. The most representative example of uncertainties is the uncertainty in the dynamic model of the robot. In general, the dynamic model of the robot is given, when we solve the navigation problem such as a path planning problem. Unfortunately, in the real world, there can be uncertainties caused by disturbances such as friction or air flow. Since the uncertainties can make the planned trajectory infeasible, it is necessary to develop a control algorithm with a high probability of success considering uncertainties. Another example is the uncertainties in motion of objects near the robot. When the robot tracks an object or avoids the obstacles, it is important to predict their motion. However, even if the prediction algorithm is quite accurate, it cannot be deterministic and uncertainties exists in the predicted value. Therefore, we need to develop a controller that is robust against uncertainties. In this dissertation, we propose robust target tracking algorithms and path planning algorithms under uncertainties. The target tracking problem aims to locate the target within the nite and fan-shaped sensing region of the robot when the motion of the target is predictable as a Gaussian distribution. We formulate a non-convex optimization problem such that the solution is the control which maximizes the success probability of tracking and minimizes the moving distance of the robot. The optimization can be solved in real time by dividing the problem into several convex problems and solving them analytically. The proposed method is successfully applied to 2D and 3D mobile robots and shows the robustness against uncertainties by guaranteeing the success probability. For more general applications, we extend the tracking algorithm to consider identity uncertainties when multiple objects are detected in the sensing region. We predict the motion of the target as a Gaussian mixture model using a multiple-hypothesis prediction algorithm which combines the motion model and the appearance model of the target. Then we propose the control which maximizes the success probability of tracking. If the success probability is guaranteed as a suciently high value, the control minimizes the moving distance of the robot. We also focus on a more complicated problem which is path planning to generate a long-period trajectory while target tracking generates a one-step control. The proposed path planning algorithm searches a trajectory which satises mission requirements specied in linear temporal logic (LTL). Since the robot does not follow the exact planned trajectory with a high probability due to uncertainties in its dynamic model, it can fail to accomplish the mission or collide with obstacles. For safety and robustness under uncertainties, we propose a multi-layered sampling based path planning, where a high-level planner generates a discrete trajectory to guide a low-level planner and the low-level planner generates a safe and robust trajectory to accomplish the mission. Our algorithm has the advantage of limiting the probability of collision below a certain threshold and increasing the probability of success. The method is extended to path planning algorithms under time-varying uncertainties. The proposed methods in this dissertation represent the uncertainty a1 Introduction 1 1.1 Main Challenges 2 1.2 Organization of the Dissertation 3 2 Related Work 5 2.1 Target Tracking 5 2.2 Chance constraints for path planning 8 2.3 Linear Temporal Logic 9 2.3.1 Path Planning with Linear Temporal Logic 10 3 Robust Target Tracking Using Sensors with Bounded Fan-Shaped Sensing Regions 13 3.1 Problem Formulation 17 3.2 Mobile Robot's Dynamic Model 20 3.3 Bounded Fan-Shaped Sensing Region 21 3.4 Motion Strategies: Analytical Solutions 25 3.4.1 Solutions to 1 26 3.4.2 Solutions to 2 28 3.4.3 Selection of N 28 3.5 Robust Target Tracking in 3D 31 3.5.1 Dynamic model 31 3.5.2 Visibility Conditions 32 3.5.3 Motion Strategies 34 3.6 Simulations 36 3.6.1 Single-Step Target Tracking in 2D 36 3.6.2 Multi-Step Target Tracking in 2D 42 3.6.3 Target Tracking Using Real Human Trajectories 44 3.6.4 Multi-Step Target Tracking in 3D 48 3.7 Experiments 50 3.8 Summary 52 4 Robust Target Tracking Under Identity Uncertainty 61 4.1 Overview 61 4.2 Problem Formulation 63 4.3 Prediction Under Identity Uncertainty 65 4.3.1 Multiple-Hypothesis Prediction 66 4.3.2 Appearance Model for a Kinect Sensor 68 4.4 Tracking Failure Probability 69 4.5 Motion Strategies 72 4.5.1 Optimization for 1 73 4.5.2 Optimization for 2 73 4.6 Experiments 74 4.6.1 Simulation: Single-Step Target Tracking 74 4.6.2 Simulation: Multi-Step Target Tracking 76 4.6.3 Pedestrian Tracking Experiments 77 4.7 Summary 79 5 Robust Multi-Layered Sampling-Based Path Planning for Temporal Logic-Based Missions 89 5.1 Overview 89 5.2 Problem Formulation 92 5.2.1 Mission Failure Probability 94 5.2.2 Feasibility 96 5.3 Proposed Method 97 5.3.1 Data Structure 97 5.3.2 High-Level Planner 98 5.3.3 Low-Level Planner 99 5.3.4 Analysis 103 5.4 Experimental results 105 5.4.1 Simulation Study 105 5.4.2 Experiments 110 5.5 Summary 110 6 Robust Multi-Objective Path Planning under time-varying disturbances 123 6.1 Problem Formulation 125 6.1.1 Fluid Flow Estimation 127 6.1.2 Mission completion 129 6.1.3 Mission Failure Probability 130 6.1.4 Feasibility 132 6.2 Proposed Method 133 6.2.1 High-Level planner 133 6.2.2 Low-Level Planner 135 6.2.3 Analysis 137 6.3 Simulations 141 6.4 Summary 150 7 Conclusion and Future Work 153Docto

    The Method of an Old Tale Lesson(Teaching) Applying Story Pattern

    No full text
    corecore