43 research outputs found

    Relation of Future Research in Special Education and Educational Practice- A Systems Perspective -

    No full text
    특수ꡐ윑 연ꡬ가 κ°œλ³„μ  μ—°κ΅¬λ°©μ‹μ—μ„œ νƒˆν”Όν•˜μ—¬ 체제적 λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μ „ν™˜ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€λŠ” 기초적인 μ œμ•ˆμˆ˜μ€€μ΄κΈ°λŠ” ν•˜μ§€λ§Œ 체제적 접근은 μ’…λž˜μ˜ 연ꡬ방법보닀 νš¨κ³Όκ°€ 있음이 λΆ„λͺ…ν•˜λ‹€. 우리의 특수ꡐ윑 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” μ–΄λ– ν•œ λ°©ν–₯성을 μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€κ³  말할 수 없을 μ •λ„λ‘œ κ°œλ³„μ„±μ„ μΆ”κ΅¬ν•˜μ—¬ μ™”μ—ˆλ‹€. λ”°λΌμ„œ μ΄μ œλŠ” 기쑴의 연ꡬ방법에 λŒ€ν•œ 닀각적인 뢄석이 μžˆμ–΄μ•Ό 함은 λ¬Όλ‘  연ꡬ ν™œλ™μ˜ 닀각화가 ν•„μš”ν•˜λ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 체제 지ν–₯적 연ꡬ 및 체제 지ν–₯적 ν‰κ°€μ˜ ꡬ상 λ°©ν–₯을 μ„€μ •ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό ν•˜λ©°, 이 뢄야에 더 λ§Žμ€ 지원을 아끼지 말아야 ν•œλ‹€. λ¬Όλ‘  우리의 특수ꡐ윑 μ—°κ΅¬ν† λŒ€ μžμ²΄κ°€ λ―Έμ•½ν•œ 것은 μ‚¬μ‹€μ΄μ§€λ§Œ, κ°œλ³„μ  연ꡬ가 μ•„λ‹Œ λ‹€μ–‘ν•œ λΆ„μ•Όμ˜ 전문가와 μ „λ¬Έμ˜μ—­μ΄ νŒ€μ„ 이루어 μ‹œλ„ν•˜λŠ” 체제 지ν–₯적 연ꡬ에 λŒ€ν•œ κ°œλ…ν™”μ™€ 이에 λŒ€ν•œ 보닀 λΆ„λͺ…ν•œ μ„€λͺ…과정을 ν†΅ν•˜μ—¬ 체계적 과학적, 그리고 효과적 μ—°κ΅¬μ˜ ν† λŒ€λ₯Ό λ§ˆλ ¨ν•˜μ—¬μ•Ό ν•œλ‹€. Systems perspective proposes that special education research has to be shifted from individual way to systemic way. And it is apparent that systems perspective, though basic suggestion, is more effective than existing research methodology. In the meantime, special education research in Korea has inclined too much to individuality, so that we can hardly see any of tendencies. Consequently, it is necessary for us to be diversifying research as well as to be variously analysing the existing methodologies. To serve this purpose, we have to set the direction for realizing both system-oriented research and system-oriented evaluation, and to do more and more support. Although the research foundation for special education itself is weak, system-oriented research is to be performed in which professional areas and professionals from diverse fields collaborate as a team. Furthermore, we have to prepare systematic, scientific, and effective base for research by conceptualization of system-oriented research and more obvious explanation process about it

    `λ¬΄μ˜μ‹`의 μ‚¬νšŒμ΄λ‘ μ— λŒ€ν•œ 연ꡬ : ν”„λ‘œμ΄νŠΈμ˜ 정신뢄석학을 μ€‘μ‹¬μœΌλ‘œ

    No full text
    ν•™μœ„λ…Όλ¬Έ(석사)--μ„œμšΈλŒ€ν•™κ΅ λŒ€ν•™μ› :μ‚¬νšŒν•™κ³Ό,1997.Maste

    νƒˆλ‹¨λ°± λΌμ§€λΌˆμ™€ μ†ŒλΌˆλ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•œ μƒμ•…λ™κ±°μƒμˆ μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ¬΄μž‘μœ„μž„μƒμ‹œν—˜

    No full text
    Department of Dentistryνƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μš°κ³¨μ€ κ³Όκ±°λΆ€ν„° μƒμ•…λ™κ±°μƒμˆ μ— 널리 μ‚¬μš©λ˜μ–΄ 온 κ³¨μ΄μ‹μž¬μ΄λ©°, μ΅œκ·Όμ—λŠ” νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μ €κ³¨μ΄ νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μš°κ³¨μ„ λŒ€μ²΄ν•  수 μžˆλŠ” 이쒅골 μ΄μ‹μž¬λ‘œ μƒμ‚°λ˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. 이 λ¬΄μž‘μœ„μž„μƒμ‹œν—˜μ˜ λͺ©μ μ€ 상악동에 νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μš°κ³¨κ³Ό νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μ €κ³¨μ„ 각각 μ΄μ‹ν•œ ν›„ 쑰직학적 골질과 방사선학적 λΆ€ν”Όμ˜ μ•ˆμ •μ„±μ„ λΉ„κ΅ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀. 총 16λͺ… ν™˜μžμ˜ 20개 상악동이 μž„μƒμ‹œν—˜μ— λ“±λ‘λ˜μ–΄ λ¬΄μž‘μœ„λ‘œ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ— λ°°μ •λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ˜ μƒμ•…λ™μ—λŠ” 각각 νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μš°κ³¨κ³Ό νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μ €κ³¨μ„ μ΄μ‹ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λ‹¨μΌλ§Ήκ²€μœΌλ‘œ μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ–΄ λͺ¨λ“  ν™˜μžλŠ” μ‹œν—˜μ΄ 끝날 λ•ŒκΉŒμ§€ μžμ‹ μ΄ μ†ν•œ ꡰ을 μ•Œ 수 μ—†μ—ˆλ‹€. μˆ˜μˆ μ€ μƒμ•…λ™μ˜ 츑벽에 ν‘œμ€€ν™”λœ ν˜•νƒœλ‘œ κ³¨μ‚­μ œλ₯Ό μ‹œν–‰ν•œ ν›„, 상악동막을 κ±°μƒν•˜κ³  λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ˜ κ³¨μ΄μ‹μž¬λ₯Ό μ΄μ‹ν•˜λŠ” λ°©μ‹μœΌλ‘œ μ§„ν–‰λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 수술 직후에 ν•΄λ‹Ή λΆ€μœ„μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ„ μ‹œν–‰ν•˜μ˜€κ³ , 6κ°œμ›” ν›„μ—λŠ” μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ„ μž¬μ‹œν–‰ν•˜κ³  치과용 κ΄€μƒν†±μœΌλ‘œ 쑰직생검을 μ§„ν–‰ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. κ²°κ³Ό 뢄석은 일차적으둜 쑰직학적인 κ³¨μ§ˆμ„ ν‰κ°€ν•˜μ˜€μœΌλ©°, 이차적으둜 3μ°¨μ›μœΌλ‘œ μž¬κ±΄ν•œ μ»΄ν“¨ν„°λ‹¨μΈ΅μ΄¬μ˜μ—μ„œ κ³¨μ΄μ‹μž¬μ˜ 높이와 λΆ€ν”Όλ₯Ό μΈ‘μ •ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. μž„μƒμ‹œν—˜ κ³Όμ • 쀑에 4λͺ…이 쀑도 νƒˆλ½ν•˜μ˜€κ³  1λͺ…은 뢄석 κ³Όμ •μ—μ„œ ν”„λ‘œν† μ½œ μœ„λ°˜μ΄ λ°œκ²¬λ˜μ–΄, 총 11λͺ… ν™˜μž (per-protocolλΆ„μ„μ—μ„œ15개 상악동; intention-to-treat λΆ„μ„μ—μ„œ 16개 상악동)κ°€ μ΅œμ’… 뢄석에 ν¬ν•¨λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 쑰직학적 λΆ„μ„μ—μ„œ μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ€ 신생골 ν˜•μ„±κ³Ό μž”μ‘΄ μ΄μ‹μž¬ 양에 μžˆμ–΄μ„œ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ—μ„œ 같은 μž…μž 크기의 μ΄μ‹μž¬λ₯Ό μ μš©ν–ˆμŒμ—λ„ λΆˆκ΅¬ν•˜κ³  λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°μ— λΉ„ν•΄ μ‹œν—˜κ΅°μ˜ 쑰직 μŠ¬λΌμ΄λ“œμ—μ„œ μž”μ‘΄ μ΄μ‹μž¬μ˜ 크기가 더 μž‘μ€ 것이 κ΄€μ°°λ˜μ—ˆλ‹€. 방사선학적 λΆ„μ„μ—μ„œλŠ” λŒ€μ‘°κ΅°κ³Ό μ‹œν—˜κ΅° λͺ¨λ‘ μ΅œμ†Œν•œμ˜ 높이와 λΆ€ν”Όμ˜ λ³€ν™”λ₯Ό λ³΄μ˜€λ‹€. μ΄μƒμ˜ 연ꡬλ₯Ό 톡해 μƒμ•…λ™κ±°μƒμˆ μ—μ„œ νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μ €κ³¨μ΄ νƒˆλ‹¨λ°±μš°κ³¨κ³Ό λΉ„μŠ·ν•œ κ³¨ν˜•μ„±λŠ₯κ³Ό λΆ€ν”Ό μ•ˆμ •μ„±μ„ λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 것을 ν™•μΈν–ˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ 더 μ •ν™•ν•œ 평가λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄μ„œλŠ” 더 λ§Žμ€ ν‘œλ³Έμ„ ν†΅ν•œ 더 κΈ΄ κΈ°κ°„ λ™μ•ˆμ˜ μž„μƒμ‹œν—˜μ΄ ν•„μš”ν•  κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ μ‚¬λ£Œλœλ‹€.openλ°•

    Peers' Perception on Inclusion and Instructional Support for Elementary students with Mental Retardation in Inclusive Settings

    No full text
    이 μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” 정신지체 학생과 같은 ν•™κΈ‰μ—μ„œ ν•¨κ»˜ κ³΅λΆ€ν•˜κ³  μžˆλŠ” μ΄ˆλ“±ν•™μƒλ“€μ΄ 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ μΌλ°˜ν•™κΈ‰λ‚΄ μΌλ°˜κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 참여에 λŒ€ν•΄ 가지고 μžˆλŠ” 견해와 정신지체 학생이 μˆ˜μ—… 쀑에 λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 문제 행동과 ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μ§€μ›ν•˜λŠ” 방식에 λŒ€ν•œ 인식과 μ‹€μ œλ₯Ό μ•Œμ•„λ³΄λŠ”λ° λͺ©μ μ΄ μžˆλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ μ„œμšΈμ‹œλ‚΄ μ΄ˆλ“±ν•™κ΅ 10개 ν•™κΈ‰ 250λͺ…을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ μ§ˆλ¬Έμ§€λ₯Ό μ΄μš©ν•˜μ—¬ μ‘°μ‚¬ν•˜μ˜€λ‹€. 연ꡬ κ²°κ³Ό, 첫째, 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ μΌλ°˜κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • 참여에 λŒ€ν•œ ν•™κΈ‰ λ™λ£Œμ˜ 인식은 비ꡐ적 κΈμ •μ μ΄μ—ˆλ‹€. λ‘˜μ§Έ, 정신지체 학생이 μˆ˜μ—… 쀑에 λ³΄μ΄λŠ” 문제 행동에 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ λŒ€μ²˜ν•  것인가에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ μ ˆν•˜κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆκ³  μ‹€μ œλ‘œ 비ꡐ적 μ μ ˆν•˜κ²Œ λŒ€μ²˜ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. μ…‹μ§Έ, μˆ˜μ—… 쀑에 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ ν•™μŠ΅μ„ μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ 도와쀄 것인지에 λŒ€ν•΄ μ μ ˆν•˜κ²Œ μΈμ‹ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆκ³  μ‹€μ œλ‘œ 비ꡐ적 μ μ ˆν•˜κ²Œ μ§€μ›ν•˜κ³  μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. λ„·μ§Έ, 정신지체 학생과 같은 λ°˜μ—μ„œ κ³΅λΆ€ν•œ κ²½ν—˜μ€ 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ 문제 행동 및 ν•™μŠ΅ μ§€μ›μ˜ μ‹€μ œμ— 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜μ§€ λͺ»ν–ˆλ‹€. λ‹€μ„―μ§Έ, 정신지체 ν•™μƒκ³Όμ˜ 친ꡬ κ²½ν—˜μ€ 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ 문제 행동 및 ν•™μŠ΅ μ§€μ›μ˜ μ‹€μ œμ— λ‹€μ†Œ 영ν–₯을 λ―ΈμΉ˜λŠ” κ²ƒμœΌλ‘œ λ‚˜νƒ€λ‚¬λ‹€. 이와 같은 κ²°κ³ΌλŠ” 정신지체 ν•™μƒμ˜ μΌλ°˜κ΅μœ‘κ³Όμ • μ°Έμ—¬λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ 일반 학생듀을 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ ν™œμš©ν•˜κ³  지원해야 ν•˜λŠ”κ°€μ— λŒ€ν•œ μ—¬λŸ¬ μ‹œμ‚¬μ λ“€μ„ μ œκ³΅ν•˜κ³  μžˆλ‹€. The purpose of this study was to investigate peers' perception on inclusion and instructional support for students with mental retardation in inclusive settings. Two-hundred fifty students in 10 inclusive classrooms completed a questionnaire eliciting their perception on inclusion and instruction support for students with mental retardation.Primary findings included: (a) students without disabilities positively perceived inclusion of students with mental retardation, (b) students without disabilities were aware of how to address inappropriate behaviors of students with mental retardation, (c) students without disabilities positively perceived instructional support for students with mental retardation, but the students without disabilities were not able to provide such support for the students with mental retardation.,. (d) inclusive setting, itself, did not appear to promote students without disabilities to provide instructional support for the students with mental retardation, and (e) opportunities to have friendship with students with mental retardation appeared to promote students without disabilities to provide instructional support for the students with mental retardation to some extent. The implications to be drawn from this study are (a) students without disabilities can share a teachers responsibility of providing instructional support for students with disabilities, (b) peer tutoring is a promising instructional approach to increase self-esteem and interpersonal skills of students with disabilities, (c) it is important for a teacher to identify and construct peer network that can maximize the success of inclusion, and (d) it is recommended that a teacher provides an orientation on students with disabilities prior to inclusion in order to increase peer understanding and acceptance of students with disabilitie

    Media's Negative Portrayal of Bureaucrats: The Relationship of Media Coverage with Presidential Bureaucracy-Bashing and Public Perception

    No full text
    λ³Έ μ—°κ΅¬λŠ” λ―Όμ£Όν™” 이후 κΈ‰κ²©νžˆ μ•…ν™”λœ κ³΅λ¬΄μ›μ˜ μ΄λ―Έμ§€μ—λŠ” 언둠보도가 적지 μ•Šμ€ 영ν–₯을 λ―Έ 쳀을 κ²ƒμ΄λΌλŠ” 가정에 κ·Όκ±°ν•΄ λ―Όμ£Όν™” 이후 곡무원에 λŒ€ν•œ 언둠보도가 μ–΄λ–»κ²Œ λ³€ν•΄μ™”λŠ”μ§€λ₯Ό λΆ„μ„ν–ˆλ‹€. 이λ₯Ό μœ„ν•΄ κΉ€μ˜μ‚Ό-이λͺ…λ°• λŒ€ν†΅λ Ή(1993-2012) κΈ°κ°„ 4개 신문을 λŒ€μƒμœΌλ‘œ 곡무원을 닀룬 사섀을 λ‚΄μš©λΆ„μ„ν–ˆλ‹€. 뢄석 κ²°κ³Ό, 곡무원을 λΆ€μ •μ μœΌλ‘œ 닀룬 사섀이 μ „μ²΄μ˜ 85.3%에 λ‹¬ν–ˆλ‹€. λ˜ν•œ κΉ€μ˜μ‚Ό, κΉ€λŒ€μ€‘ μ‹œκΈ°μ—λŠ” κ³΅μ§λΆ€νŒ¨ λ“±κ³Ό κ΄€λ ¨λœ μœ€λ¦¬μ„± λ²”μ£Ό 보도가 κ°€μž₯ 큰 비쀑을 μ°¨μ§€ν–ˆμ§€λ§Œ, λ…Έλ¬΄ν˜„ μ΄ν›„λΆ€ν„°λŠ” λŠ₯λ ₯κ³Ό μ„±κ³Ό, λ―Όμ£Όμ„± λ²”μ£Ό 보도가 크게 μ¦κ°€ν–ˆλ‹€. μ •μΉ˜ο½₯μ‚¬νšŒμ  λ―Όμ£Όν™”μ˜ μ§„μ²™μœΌλ‘œ λΆ€νŒ¨ ν†΅μ œκ°€ μ–΄λŠ 정도 μ„±κ³΅ν•˜λ©΄μ„œ μƒλŒ€μ μœΌλ‘œ 민주적이고 참여적인 ν–‰μ •κ³Ό 정책에 λŒ€ν•œ μš”κ΅¬κ°€ λ†’μ•„μ‘ŒκΈ° λ•Œλ¬ΈμœΌλ‘œ λΆ„μ„λœλ‹€. 특히 κ³΅μ§λΆ€νŒ¨μ— λŒ€ν•œ λ³΄λ„λŠ” λŒ€ν†΅λ Ήμ΄ 주기적으둜 μ œκΈ°ν•˜λŠ” 곡직사정 의제, 그리고 그에 λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ€‘μ˜ 인식과 λ°€μ ‘νžˆ 연관돼 μžˆμ—ˆλ‹€. κ·ΈλŸ¬λ‚˜ κ³΅μ§λΆ€νŒ¨μ— λŒ€ν•œ 언둠보도, λŒ€ν†΅λ Ήμ˜ 의제, λŒ€μ€‘μ˜ 인식은 λͺ¨λ‘ μ‹€μ œ ν˜„μ‹€μ—μ„œ μΌμ–΄λ‚œ 곡무원 λ²”μ£„μ˜ 증감과 λ¬΄κ΄€ν–ˆλ‹€. μ΄λŠ” 곡무원에 λŒ€ν•œ λŒ€μ€‘μ˜ 인식은 객관적 ν˜„μ‹€μ„ λ°˜μ˜ν•˜κΈ° λ³΄λ‹€λŠ” λŒ€ν†΅λ Ήκ³Ό μ–Έλ‘  λ“±μ˜ 영ν–₯을 κ°•ν•˜κ²Œ λ°›μœΌλ©° ν˜•μ„±λμŒμ„ μ‹œμ‚¬ν•˜λŠ” 것이닀.This study aims to analyze how the media's portrayal of bureaucrats has changed in Korea since the democratization of 1987. To this end, the authors conducted a content analysis of editorials focused on bureaucrats. The sample was from the editorials of four newspapers issued from the Kim Young-sam Administration to the Lee Myung-bak Administration (1993-2012). It was found that 85.3% of bureaucrat-focused editorials described bureaucrats in a negative way. It was also found that coverage concerning corruption in of ficialdom was most common in the Kim Young-sam and the Kim Dae-jung Administrations, but that coverage related to bureaucracys capacity, performance, and responsiveness have gradually increased since the Roh Mu-hyun Administration. This indicates meaningful interpretations that, while the corrupt practices of government officials gradually decreased since democratization, citizens demands for getting involved in the public policy process increased. In addition, it was found that the coverage concerning corruption in officialdom was related to president-initiated bureaucracy bashing and the public perception of corruption among public officials. This may suggest that president-initiated 'bureaucracy bashing' influences press reports, which also negatively affect public perception of officials. It was also found that the three variables, president-initiated bureaucracy bashing, media's negative portrayal of officials, and negative public perception of officials, were not related to real changes in corrupt practices by government officials. These findings may suggest that the negative image of officials is socially constructed
    corecore