114 research outputs found
Consumer`s safety consciousness and safety seeking behavior
νμλ
Όλ¬Έ(λ°μ¬)--μμΈλνκ΅ λνμ :μλΉμμλνκ³Ό,1997.Docto
Analysis of health promotion needs in employees in a government office in Seoul
κ°νΈνκ³Ό/μμ¬[νκΈ]
λ³Έ μ°κ΅¬λ μμΈμ μΌ κ΅¬μ² μ§μμ 건κ°μ¦μ§ μꡬλ₯Ό νμ
νκ³ κ·Έ κ΄κ³μ λΆμμ ν΅νμ¬ μ§μ₯λ΄ κ±΄κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ κ°λ°νκΈ° μν κΈ°μ΄μλ£λ₯Ό μ 곡νκΈ° μν΄ μλλ μμ μ μκ΄κ΄κ³ μ°κ΅¬μ΄λ€.
μ°κ΅¬μ λμμ μΌ κ΅¬μ²μ 근무νλ μ μ§μμ€ μΈκ·Όμλ₯Ό μ μΈν 586λͺ
μ΄μκ³ μλ£ μμ§κΈ°κ°μ 1997λ
4μ 30μΌλΆν° 5μ 10μΌ κΉμ§ μ€μνμλ€. μ°κ΅¬μ λꡬλ κΉμμμΈ (1996)κ° κ°λ°ν ꡬ쑰νλ μκ°λ³΄κ³ ν μ§λ¬Έμ§λ₯Ό κΈ°λ³ΈμΌλ‘ μ°κ΅¬μκ° λ¬Ένκ³ μ°°μ ν΅νμ¬ μμ 보μ
ν μ§λ¬Έμ§λ₯Ό μ¬μ©νμκ³ μμ§λ μλ£λ SPSS Windowλ₯Ό μ΄μ©νμ¬ μ μ°μ²λ¦¬νμμΌλ©° κ·Έ κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
1. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μΈκ΅¬μ¬ννμ μΈ νΉμ±μ λ¨μκ° 71.8%, μ¬μκ° 27.2%λ‘ λ¨μκ° λ§μμΌλ©° μ°λ Ήμ 21μΈμμ 62μΈκΉμ§λ‘ νκ· μ°λ Ήμ 37.2μΈ μλ€. κ΅μ‘μμ€μ κ³ μ‘Έμ΄μμ΄ 94.9%λ‘ λμ κ΅μ‘μμ€μ 보μμΌλ©° κΈ°νΌμ΄ 77.1%μ΄λ©° 50.6%κ° μ’
κ΅λ₯Ό κ°μ§κ³ μμλ€.
2. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μΈμ§λ 건κ°μνλ 보ν΅μ΄ 45.2%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μλ€.
3. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ 건κ°νμλ ν‘μ°μ¨μ΄ 41.1%μκ³ μμ£Όμ¨μ 74.1%μ΄μλ€. μ°κ΅¬λμμμ μ΄λμ λλ 14.3%κ° μ£Ό3-4νμ΄μ, 26.1%κ° μ£Ό1-2ν μ΄λνκ³ μμμΌλ©°, 59.2%κ° μ΄λμ κ±°μ μνκ³ μμλ€.
4. λμμμ μ§μ
μ νΉμ±μΌλ‘ νκ· κ·Όλ¬΄λ
μκ° 9.6λ
μ΄μμΌλ©°, μ
무λ§μ‘±λλ 보ν΅μ κ²½μ°κ° 52.4%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μκ³ λ§μ‘±νλ κ²½μ°κ° 33.6%μκ³ λΆλ§μ‘±νλ κ²½μ°λ 14.0%μμΌλ©°, 근무νκ²½ λ§μ‘±λλ 보ν΅μΈ κ²½μ°κ° 65.7%λ‘ κ°μ₯ λ§μλ€.
5. 건κ°μ¦μ§μ λν μꡬλλ κ°μ₯ λμ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ μ΄λνλ‘κ·Έλ¨(58.4%)μ΄μμΌλ©° λ€μμ μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬(46.4%), 체μ€μ‘°μ λ° κ΄λ¦¬(29.9%), μμλ°©(29.0%), κΈμ°(18.4%), κ³ νμ(15.7%), κΈμ£Ό(13.8%), λΉλ¨κ΄λ¦¬(11.4%)μ μ μ΄μλ€.
6. 건κ°μ¦μ§μ λν μ°Έμ¬μλλ κ°μ₯ λμ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ΄ μ΄λνλ‘κ·Έλ¨(49.3%)μ΄μμΌλ©° λ€μμ μ€νΈλ μ€ κ΄λ¦¬(42.6%), 체μ€μ‘°μ λ° κ΄λ¦¬(26.5%),μμλ°©(25.3%), κΈμ°(15.2%), κ³ νμ(13.5%), κΈμ£Ό(11.4%), λΉλ¨κ΄λ¦¬(10.4%)μμ΄μλ€.
7. λ‘μ§μ€ν± νκ·λΆμμ ν΅ν΄ 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ λν μꡬλμ μ μνκ² μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ λΆμν κ²°κ³Όλ λ€μκ³Ό κ°λ€.
λλΆλΆμ λμμλ€μ΄ μ΄λμ΄λ μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨κ³Ό κ°μ΄ μ λ°μ μΈ κ±΄κ°μ¦μ§μ λͺ©μ μΌλ‘ νλ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μνκ³ μμΌλ©° μ΄λνλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μꡬλμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈλ€μ κ²½μ μμ€, 근무λΆμ, μ§μ₯ λ΄μμμ 건κ°μ μ€μμ±μ λν μΈμ§, ν‘μ°μΌλ‘ λνλ¬μΌλ©°, μ€νΈλ μ€κ΄λ¦¬ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μꡬλμ μν₯μ λ―ΈμΉλ μμΈμ μ±λ³, μ’
κ΅, ν‘μ°, μ€νΈλ μ€ μ λλ‘ λνλ¬λ€. ννΈ κ³ νμ, λΉλ¨, κΈμ°, κΈμ£Όμ κ°μ ꡬ체μ μΈ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨λ€μ μμ΄μλ κ³ νμ, κ³ νλΉ, ν‘μ°, μμ£Ό, κ³Όλ€μ²΄μ€κ³Ό κ°μ 건κ°μνμμλ€μ μ€μ λ‘ κ°μ§κ³ μλ λμμλ€μμ 건κ°μνμμμ κ΄λ ¨λ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μꡬλκ° ν΅κ³μ μΌλ‘ μ μνκ² λμ κ²μΌλ‘ λνλ¬λ€.
λ°λΌμ κ΅¬μ² μ§μλ€μ΄ μμ μ μ λ°μ μΈ κ±΄κ°μνλ₯Ό μ¦μ§μν€κ±°λ 건κ°μ μ ν΄ν νμλ₯Ό 건κ°νμλ‘ λ³νμν€λ €λ μκ΅¬κ° λλ€κ³ μκ°λλ©°, λμμλ€μ μꡬλμ λ§λ 건κ°μ¦μ§ νλ‘κ·Έλ¨μ μ κ°λ°νμ¬ μ€μνλ€λ©΄ μ’μ κ²°κ³Όλ₯Ό μ»μ μ μμ κ²μ΄λΌ μκ°λλ€.
[μλ¬Έ]
This study was conducted to prepare a data base for a health promotion program for employees who were working for a certain Government Office in Seoul. An investigation of the types of health promotion employee needed and analysing the influencing factors in their health promotion needs was made.
This is a descriptive correlation study. The data was collected from April 30 to May 10 1997 utilizing a questionaire deveolped by Euisook Kim et al(1996) revised through studying reference, and was analyzed using the SPSS(Statistical Package for Social Science)-Window P.C.
The following is a summary of the study
1. The study surveyed a total of 586 employees. Among the subjects, 71.8% were men and 27.2% were women. The mean age of the subjects wes 37.2 years with the range from 21 to 62 years, and the majority (77.1%) were married. A large proportion of the subjects (94.9%) had received a high school education or further
education and a small majority reported a having religion(50.6%).
2. Among the subjects, 41.1% were smokers, 74.1% consumed alcohol, 14.3% engaged in regular exercise at least 3 or 4 times a week, 26.1% engaged in exercise at least once or twice a week, 59.2% did not exercise; 45.2% perceived themselves as being moderately healthy.
3. The average working period was 9.6 years in the Government Office, and 52.4% of the were moderately satisfied with their jobs ; 33.6% of subjects were satsfied; 14.0% of subjects were dissatisfied. In terms of the job environment, 65.7% of subjects were moderately satisfied; 14.2% of subjects were satsfied ; 20.1% were dissatisfied.
4. Among the types of health promotion programs, an exercise program (58.4%) was what the subjects needed the most, followed by stress management (46.4%), weight control (29.9%), cancer prevention (29.0%), smoking cessation (18.4%), hypertension management (15.7%), a program to stop drinking alcohol (13.8%), and diabetic melitus management (11.4%).
5. Among the types of health promotion programs, an exercise program (49.3%) was what the subjects showed the highest intent of participation followed by stress management program (42.6%), weight control program (26.5%), cancer prevention program (25.3%), smoking cessation program (26.5%), cancer prevention program (25.3%), smoking cessation program (15.2%), hypertension management program (13.5%), a program to stop drinking alcohol (11.4%), and diabetic melitus management program (10.4%).
Consequently, a large proportion of the subjects wanted general health promotion programs to promote their present health status, such as exercise or stress management programs. On the other hand, subjects who had specfic risk factors such as hypertension, hyperglycemia, being overweight, smoking, and drinking, desired
specfic programs focusing on hypertension management, diabetic melitus control, body weight management, smoking cessation or drinking cessation.
The subjects showed that they had health promotion needs in order to promote their present health status or to prevent further disease related health risk factors that they may have.restrictio
- β¦