5 research outputs found

    (The) effect of breastfeeding education program in postpartum woman on breastfeeding practice

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/์„์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€] ์ตœ๊ทผ ์˜๋ฃŒ๊ณ„ ์ผ๋ถ€์™€ ์†Œ๋น„์ž ๋‹จ์ฒด๋“ค์—์„œ ๊ฐ์†Œ์ถ”์„ธ์— ์žˆ๋Š” ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ž๊ฐ๊ณผ ๋”๋ถˆ์–ด ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ๋ฅผ ์ค‘์ง„ ์‹œํ‚ค๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ์šด๋™์ด ํ™•์‚ฐ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ์‚ถ์ธ ์˜์•„๊ธฐ์— ์ตœ์ƒ์˜ ์˜์–‘๋ฒ•์ด ๊ณต๊ธ‰๋˜๋„๋ก ํ•˜์—ฌ ์ผ์ƒ์— ์žˆ์–ด์„œ ์„ฑ์žฅ์˜ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๊ณ ์ž ํ•˜๋Š” ์˜๋„์ธ ๊ฒƒ์ด๋‹ค. ์ด์™€ ๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ํ™•์‚ฐ ์šด๋™์—๋„ ๋ถˆ๊ตฌํ•˜๊ณ  ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์˜ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์œจ์€ ์•„์ง ๋‚ฎ์€ ์ˆ˜์ค€์œผ๋กœ ๋ณด๊ณ ๋˜๊ณ  ์žˆ์–ด ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์ฆ์ง„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๋”์šฑ ๋งŽ์€ ๋…ธ๋ ฅ์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•˜๋‹ค. ์šฐ๋ฆฌ๋‚˜๋ผ์˜ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋กœ๋Š” ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์˜ ์šฐ์ˆ˜์„ฑ, ์‹คํƒœ์กฐ์‚ฌ, ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์˜๋ฃŒ์ธ์ด๋‚˜ ์‚ฐ๋ชจ์˜ ํƒœ๋„์กฐ์‚ฌ, ๋ชจ์œ ๋ฅผ ์ค‘๋‹จ์‹œํ‚ค๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ง€์†์‹œํ‚ค๋Š” ์š”์ธ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ฑ์ด ์ฃผ๋ฅ˜๋ฅผ ์ด๋ฃจ๊ณ  ์žˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ๋ฅผ ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ฌ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์ค‘์žฌ ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์˜ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœ์ด๋‚˜ ์ค‘์žฌํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๋งŽ์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‹ค์ •์ด๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์ฆ์ง„์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ค‘์žฌ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋“ค๋„ ๋Œ€๋ถ€๋ถ„ 1ํšŒ์˜ ๊ต์œก์— ๊ทธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๋งŽ์•„ ๋ณด๋‹ค๋‹ค ์–‘ํ•œ ์ ‘๊ทผ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ด ์š”์ฒญ๋œ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ฐœ๋ณ„๊ต์œก๊ณผ ์ „ํ™”์ค‘์žฌ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋œ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ต์œกํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ œ๊ณตํ•œ ํ›„ ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๋Š” ๋น„๋™๋“ฑ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ ์‚ฌํ›„ ์‹œ์ฐจ์„ค๊ณ„(nonequivalent control group posttest non-synchronized design)์ด๋ฉฐ ์œ ์‚ฌ์‹คํ—˜์„ค๊ณ„์ด๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„์€ 1995๋…„ 3์›” 19์ผ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ 5์›” 12์ผ ๊นŒ์ง€ ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ •๋ณด์˜ ํ™•์‚ฐํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์šฐ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘์„ ๋จผ์ € ํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  1์ฃผ์ผ์˜ ๊ฐ„๊ฒฉ์„ ๋‘๊ณ  ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์˜ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ๋ฐ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Œ€์ƒ์€ T์‹œ์— ์œ„์น˜ํ•œ ๋ชจ์•„ ๋™์‹ค๋กœ ์šด์˜๋˜๋Š” 6๊ฐœ์˜ ์‚ฐ๋ถ€์ธ๊ณผ ๊ฐœ์ธ ๋ณ‘์›์— ์ž…์›ํ•œ ์‚ฐ๋ชจ ์ค‘ ๋ถ„๋งŒ ํ›„ 72์‹œ๊ฐ„์„ ๋„˜์ง€ ์•Š์€ ์‚ฌ๋žŒ์ด์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์œ ์˜ํ‘œ์ถœํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ตœ์ข… ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ 79๋ช…, ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ 72๋ช…์œผ๋กœ ์ด 151๋ช…์ด์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋ฅผ ์ž…์› ๊ธฐ๊ฐ„ ์ค‘ ๋ฐฉ๋ฌธํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์˜ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์ , ์‚ฌํšŒ์  ํŠน์„ฑ, ๋ถ„๋งŒ๊ณผ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ํŠน์„ฑ, ํ‡ด์› ํ›„ ์ˆ˜์œ ๊ณ„ํš๊ณผ ์ถ”ํ›„ ์ „ํ™” ์—ฐ๋ฝ์ฒ˜๋ฅผ ๊ตฌ์กฐํ™”๋œ ์„ค๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ๊ธฐ์ดˆ๋กœ ๋ฉด์ ‘ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—๊ฒŒ๋Š” ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ํ›„ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ๊ฐœ๋ณ„๊ต์œก์ด ์ฃผ์–ด์กŒ๊ณ  ํ‡ด์› ํ›„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ 2์ฐจ๋ก€์˜ ์ „ํ™”๋ฅผ ํ•˜์—ฌ ์นญ์ฐฌ๊ณผ ๊ด€์‹ฌ๋“ฑ์˜ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋˜ํ•œ ์‚ฐ๋ชจ๋“ค๋„ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์— ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ์‚ฌํ•ญ์„ ์–ธ์ œ๋“ ์ง€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ์ „ํ™”ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ด์™€๊ฐ™์€ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ต์œกํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž 1์ธ์— ์˜ํ•ด ์ œ๊ณต๋˜์—ˆ์œผ๋ฉฐ ์‚ฐํ›„ 4์ฃผ์งธ ์ „ํ™”๋กœ ์ˆ˜์œ ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์กฐ์‚ฌํ•˜์—ฌ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ๊ณผ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์˜ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์‹ค์ฒœ์œจ์„ ๋น„๊ตํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๋ฃŒ๋ถ„์„์€ SPSS-PC๋ฅผ ์‚ฌ์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐฑ๋ถ„์œจ, ์นด์ด์Šคํ€˜์–ด ๊ฒ€์ฆ(ฯ‡**2 -test), ๋กœ์ง€์Šคํ‹ฑ ํฌ๊ท€๋ถ„์„(logistic regression)์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์˜ ์š”์•ฝ์€ ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฐฉ๋ฒ•์ธ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ต์œกํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์˜ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์•Œ์•„๋ณด๊ธฐ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ฯ‡**2 -test ์™€ Logistic regression์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•œ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ต์œกํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์„ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›์€ ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์€ ์ œ๊ณต๋ฐ›์ง€ ์•Š์€ ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์— ๋น„ํ•ด ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์‹ค์ฒœ์œจ์€ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค(ฯ‡**2 =5.6660, p=.0590, Odds Ratio=4.0166, p=.0010, 95% Cl=1.7608-9.1611). ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์™€ ๊ด€๋ จ๋œ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ๋Š” ๋ถ„๋งŒ ํ˜•ํƒœ, ์ง์—…, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ธ๊ณต์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ณ„ํš์ด ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์‹ค์ฒœ์— ๊ฐ€์žฅ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์น˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค(๋ถ„๋งŒํ˜•ํƒœ Odds Ratio=.4342, P= .0427, 95% Cl= 0.1937-7.9727 ; ์ง์—… Odds Ratio= .2260, P= .0139, 95% Cl= 0.0691-0.7391 ; ์ธ๊ณต์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ณ„ํš Odds Ratio= .07737 P= .0023, 95% Cl= 0.0138-0.3929). ์ธ๊ณต์ˆ˜์œ ๋ฅผ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋œ ๋™๊ธฐ๋กœ๋Š” ๋‘ ๊ตฐ ๋ชจ๋‘์—์„œ ๋ชจ์œ ๋Ÿ‰ ๋ถ€์กฑ์ด ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ์ด์œ ์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ ์ธ๊ณต์ˆ˜์œ ๋ฅผ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•œ ์‹œ๊ธฐ๋กœ๋Š” ์‹คํ—˜๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์‚ฐํ›„ 1์ฃผ ์ด๋‚ด๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์€ ์ˆ˜๋ฅผ ์ฐจ์ง€ํ•œ๋ฐ ๋น„ํ•ด ๋Œ€์กฐ๊ตฐ์—์„œ๋Š” ์ฒ˜์Œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์ธ๊ณต์ˆ˜์œ ๋ฅผ ํ•œ ๊ฒฝ์šฐ๊ฐ€ ๊ฐ€์žฅ ๋งŽ์•˜๋‹ค. ์ด์ƒ์˜ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋กœ ์‚ฐํ›„ ์ดˆ๊ธฐ ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ ์‹œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ฐ˜๋ณต์ ์ด๊ณ  ๊ฐ•๋ ฅํ•œ ๊ต์œก๊ณผ ๊ฐ•ํ™”๋ฅผ ์ œ๊ณตํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณธ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ๊ต์œกํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ ์˜ ์‹ค์ฒœ์„ ์ฆ์ง„์‹œํ‚ค๋Š”๋ฐ ํšจ๊ณผ์ ์ด์˜€์Œ์„ ์•Œ ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค. ์ด ํ”„๋กœ๊ทธ๋žจ์€ ๋ชจ์•„๋™์‹ค์ด๋ผ๋Š” ์ œํ•œ๋œ ์ƒํ™ฉ๋งŒ์„ ๋Œ€์ƒ์œผ๋กœ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋˜์—ˆ๊ธฐ ๋•Œ๋ฌธ์— ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ์ผ๋ฐ˜ํ™”ํ•˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์ œํ•œ์ ์ด ์žˆ์œผ๋ฏ€๋กœ ๊ทธ ๋ฐ–์˜ ์ƒํ™ฉ์—์„œ๋„ ์ ์šฉํ•˜๊ณ  ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•˜์—ฌ ๊ทธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ๊ถŒ์žฅํ•˜๋ฉฐ, ์‚ฐํ›„ 1๊ฐœ์›” ์ด์ƒ์˜ ๋ณด๋‹ค ์žฅ๊ธฐ์ ์ธ ๋ชจ์œ ์ˆ˜์œ  ์‹ค์ฒœ์–‘์ƒ์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ] Recently a promotion of breastfeeding attitude among health care Profession along with Consumer's Right Association has been enhanced. The purpose of this study is to elucidate the effectiveness of breastfeeding education program on breastfeeding practice. The breastfeeding education program is consisted of individual lectures and providing on breastfeeding to the subjects have been given. Also two times of telephone counseling to the subjects while they discharged from hospital. This study is a quasi-experimental design using non-equivalent control group post-test non-synchronized design. Data collection was done from March 19 to May 12 in 1995. A data on control group was collected first and week interval was established between control group and experimental group to get effectiveness of information diffusion. The subjects was selected from 6 local obstetric clinics in T city. Also sampling was conducted with convenience. The data were analyzed in terms of percentage, ฯ‡**2 -test and logistic regression through Spss-PC. The following is the summary of this study. 1) Breastfeeding rate of the experimental group was higher than the control group.(ฯ‡**2 = 5.6600, P= .0590 : Odds Ratio = 4.0166, P= .0010, 95% CI= 1.7608-9.1611) 2) Factors related to breastfeeding were a delivery type, a job, a feeding plan, especially bottle feeding(job Odds ratio=.2260, P=.0139, 95% Cl=0.0691-0.7391; delivery type Odds ratio=.4342, p=.0427, 95% Cl=0.1937-0.9727: bottle feeding plan Odds Ratio=.0737, p=.0023, 95% Cl=0.0138-03929). 3) The insufficient milk supply was th main cause of bottle feeding. Also there exists a week of time difference on starting bottle feeding between the experimental and control groups. In conclusion, a strong emphasis on the breastfeeding education along with intensive telephone counseling shows a significant promotion of breastfeeding.restrictio

    (A) structural equation model explaining contraception behaviors of married Korean women.

    No full text
    ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธํ•™๊ณผ/๋ฐ•์‚ฌ[ํ•œ๊ธ€]๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋Š” ํ•œ๊ตญ ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์—ฌ์„ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ตฌํ˜•์„ ๊ตฌ์ถ•ํ•˜๊ณ  ์ด๋ฅผ ๊ฒ€์ฆํ•˜๋ ค๋Š” ๊ณต๋ณ€๋Ÿ‰ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ถ„์„ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ด๋‹ค. ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์‹ ๋… ๋ชจ๋ธ, ๊ณ„ํš์  ํ–‰์œ„ ์ด๋ก , ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๊ด‘๋ฒ”์œ„ํ•œ ๋ฌธํ—Œ๊ณ ์ฐฐ์„ ํ†ตํ•ด ๊ฐ€์„ค์  ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค์  ๋ชจํ˜•์€ 7๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑ๋˜๋Š”๋ฐ ์™ธ์ƒ๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ํ”ผ์ž„์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ์ง€์‹, ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ, ์„ฑ์  ์ž์œจ์„ฑ, ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ถ€๊ฐ„ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต์˜ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ๋ณ€์ธ์ด์ด๋‹ค. ์ด ์ค‘ ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ์€ ๋‹ค์‹œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ๋ฏผ๊ฐ์„ฑ๊ณผ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์‹ฌ๊ฐ์„ฑ์˜ 2๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก์ • ๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๊ณ  ๋ถ€๋ถ€๊ฐ„ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต์€ ์ผ๋ฐ˜์  ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต๊ณผ ์„ฑ๊ด€๋ จ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต์˜ 2๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก์ •๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋‚ด์ƒ๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ๋Š” ํ”ผ์ž„์— ๊ด€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„, ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ํ–‰์œ„ํ†ต์ œ, ์„ฑ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๊ณ„ํš์„ฑ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„๋กœ ๊ตฌ์„ฑํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„ ์ง€์†์„ฑ๊ณผ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„ ์ •ํ™•์„ฑ์˜ ๋‘ ๊ฐœ์˜ ์ธก์ •๋ณ€์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜๋ˆ„์–ด ํ”ผ์ž„์„ ์ธก์ •ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ์ž๊ฐ€๋ณด๊ณ ์‹ ์งˆ๋ฌธ์ง€๋ฅผ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ์„œ์šธ, ๋Œ€์ „, ๊ฐ•์›, ์ถฉ์ฒญ์ง€์—ญ์—์„œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์ˆ˜์ง‘ ํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์— ์ฐธ์—ฌํ•œ ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž๋Š” ์ด 243๋ช…์ด์—ˆ๋‹ค. ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๋„๊ตฌ๋Š” ๊ธฐ์กด์˜ ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ ๋‚ด์šฉ์„ ์ˆ˜์ •๋ณด์™„ ํ•˜๊ฑฐ๋‚˜ ์ œ์ž‘ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์ž๊ฐ€ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋ฉฐ, ๋„๊ตฌ์˜ Cronbach's ฮฑ๊ฐ’์€ .60์—์„œ๋ถ€ํ„ฐ .88์˜ ๋ฒ”์œ„์˜€๋‹ค. ์ˆ˜์ง‘๋œ ์ž๋ฃŒ๋Š” SPSS 8.0 Win program๊ณผ LISREL 8.12a Win program์„ ์ด์šฉํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ถ„์„ํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๋ชจํ˜•๊ตฌ์ถ•๊ณผ์ •์„ ๊ฐ„๋‹จํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๊ธฐ์ˆ ํ•˜๋ฉด ๋‹ค์Œ๊ณผ ๊ฐ™๋‹ค. 1. ๊ฐ€์„ค์  ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์ „๋ฐ˜์  ๋ถ€ํ•ฉ๋„๋Š” ์‹ค์ œ ์ž๋ฃŒ์™€ ๋น„๊ต์  ์ž˜ ๋ถ€ํ•ฉํ•˜์˜€์œผ๋‚˜ ๋ถ€๋ถ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ˆ˜์ •์ด ํ•„์š”ํ•จ์„ ์‹œ์‚ฌํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค(ฯ‡2=43.03, p=0.019, ฯ‡2/df=1.65, GFI=0.97, AGFI= 0.93, RMR=0.03, NNFI=0.97, NFI=0.97, CN=257.72). 2. ๋”์šฑ ๊ฐ„๋ช…ํ•˜๋ฉด์„œ๋„ ๋ถ€ํ•ฉ๋„ ๋†’์€ ๋ชจํ˜•์„ ์œ„ํ•˜์—ฌ ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์„ธ๋ถ€์  ์ง€์ˆ˜๊ฐ’์ธ ๊ณ ์ •์ง€์ˆ˜, ์ถ”๊ฐ€์ง€์ˆ˜ ๊ทธ๋ฆฌ๊ณ  ์ด๋ก ์  ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ๊ณ ๋ คํ•˜์—ฌ 4๊ฐœ์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ์ œ๊ฑฐ๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. 3. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ์ตœ์ข…๋ชจํ˜•์ธ ์ˆ˜์ •๋ชจํ˜•์—์„œ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์„ค์  ๋ชจํ˜•๋ณด๋‹ค ๋ถ€ํ•ฉ์ง€์ˆ˜๊ฐ€ ๋†’๊ณ , ๋ชจํ˜•์˜ ์„ค๋ช…๋ ฅ(SMC)์€ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„๋ฅผ 80% ์„ค๋ช…ํ•˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋†’๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค(ฯ‡2=20.54, p=0.77, ฯ‡2/df=0.79, GFI=0.99, AGFI= 0.96, RMR=0.03, NNFI=1.01, NFI=0.98, CN=538.87). ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฐ€์„ค ๊ฒ€์ฆ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์—ฌ์„ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„๋Š” ์›์น˜์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ์ด ๋†’์„ ๋•Œ(ฮณ42=0.24, t=0.67), ๋ถ€๋ถ€๊ฐ„์— ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต์„ ํšจ์œจ์ ์œผ๋กœ ์ž˜ ํ•˜๊ณ (ฮณ44 = 0.09, t=0.54), ํ”ผ์ž„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„(ฮฒ41= .33, t=1.99)๊ฐ€ ๊ธ์ •์ ์ด๋ฉฐ, ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ํ–‰์œ„ํ†ต์ œ(ฮฒ42=.71, t=5.62)๊ฐ€ ๋†’์„ ๋•Œ ์ž˜ ํ•˜๊ฒŒ ๋˜๋Š” ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์›์น˜์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ์€ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ํšจ๊ณผ๋Š” ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š์•˜์œผ๋‚˜ ํ”ผ์ž„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํƒœ๋„์™€ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ํ–‰์œ„ํ†ต์ œ๋ฅผ ํ†ตํ•œ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์ด ํฌ๊ฒŒ ์ž‘์šฉํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์„œ ์ดํšจ๊ณผ(ฮณ=1.11, t=3.03)์—์„œ ํ”ผ์ž„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ๊ฐ€์žฅ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์š”์ธ์œผ๋กœ ๋ถ„์„๋˜์—ˆ๋‹ค. ๋ถ€๋ถ€๊ฐ„ ์˜์‚ฌ์†Œํ†ต๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ”ผ์ž„์— ์ง์ ‘์ ์ธ ์˜ํ–ฅ์€ ์œ ์˜ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๊ฒŒ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์ง€๋งŒ ๊ฐ„์ ‘์ ์œผ๋กœ ํ”ผ์ž„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ๋ฏธ์นจ์œผ๋กœ์จ ์ดํšจ๊ณผ(ฮณ=.39, t=2.53)์—์„œ ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์˜ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์„ ๊ฐ€์ง์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ํ”ผ์ž„์ง€์‹(ฮณ41=.08, t=.91)์€ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„์— ํ†ต๊ณ„์ ์œผ๋กœ ์œ ์˜ํ•œ ์ˆ˜์ค€์—์„œ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ์ง€ ๋ชปํ•˜๋Š” ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ์œผ๋ฉฐ, ์„ฑ์  ์ž์œจ์„ฑ(ฮณ43=-.05, t=.54)๋„ ๋งˆ์ฐฌ๊ฐ€์ง€๋กœ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์ด ์ ์€ ๋ณ€์ˆ˜๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ์ž๊ธฐ ๋ถ€๋ถ€์˜ ์„ฑ๊ด€๊ณ„ ํŒจํ„ด์„ ํŒŒ์•…ํ•˜๊ณ  ๊ณ„ํšํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋Š” ์„ฑ๊ด€๊ณ„ ๊ณ„ํš์„ฑ(ฮฒ43=-.03, t=55)๋„ ์—ญ์‹œ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์˜ํ–ฅ๋ ฅ์€ ์ ์€ ๊ฒƒ์œผ๋กœ ๋‚˜ํƒ€๋‚ฌ๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ๋ฅผ ๋ฐ”ํƒ•์œผ๋กœ ๊ธฐํ˜ผ์—ฌ์„ฑ์˜ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„์— ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์ฃผ์š” ์š”์ธ๋“ค๊ณผ ์š”์ธ๊ฐ„์˜ ๊ฒฝ๋กœ๊ฐ€ ํŒŒ์•…๋˜์—ˆ์„ ๋ฟ๋งŒ ์•„๋‹ˆ๋ผ ๊ฑด๊ฐ•์‹ ๋… ๋ชจ๋ธ๊ณผ ๊ณ„ํš๋œ ํ–‰์œ„์ด๋ก ์—์„œ ๋นŒ๋ ค์˜จ ๋‘ ๊ฐ€์ง€ ๊ฐœ๋…์ธ ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ๊ณผ ํ”ผ์ž„์„ ์ž˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ํ–‰์œ„ํ†ต์ œ๊ฐ€ ํฐ ์˜ํ–ฅ์„ ์ฃผ๋Š” ์š”์ธ์ž„์„ ๊ฒฐ๋ก ์œผ๋กœ ๋„์ถœํ•จ์œผ๋กœ์จ ๋‘ ์ด๋ก ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„ ์„ค๋ช…์— ์œ ์šฉ์„ฑ๊ณผ ํƒ€๋‹น์„ฑ์„ ํ™•์ธํ•˜์˜€๋‹ค. ๋ณธ ์—ฐ๊ตฌ์˜ ๊ฒฐ๊ณผ์— ๋”ฐ๋ผ ํ”ผ์ž„ํ–‰์œ„ ์ฆ์ง„์„ ์œ„ํ•œ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ „๋žต ์ˆ˜๋ฆฝ ์‹œ, ์ง€์‹์ „๋‹ฌ ์œ„์ฃผ์˜ ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ค‘์žฌ ๋ณด๋‹ค๋Š” ์›ํ•˜์ง€ ์•Š๋Š” ์ž„์‹ ์— ๋Œ€ํ•œ ์ง€๊ฐ๋œ ์œ„ํ˜‘๊ฐ์„ ๊ฐ•์กฐํ•˜๊ณ  ๋Œ€์ƒ์ž์—๊ฒŒ ํ”ผ์ž„์„ ์ž˜ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋‹ค๋Š” ํ†ต์ œ๊ฐ์„ ์Šค์Šค๋กœ ๋งŽ์ด ์ž๊ฐํ•˜๊ฒŒ ํ•  ์ˆ˜ ์žˆ๋„๋ก ๊ฐ„ํ˜ธ์ค‘์žฌ๋ฅผ ๊ฐœ๋ฐœํ•˜๊ณ  ์ œ๊ณตํ•ด์•ผ ํ•  ๊ฒƒ์„ ์ œ์•ˆํ•œ๋‹ค. [์˜๋ฌธ]The purpose of this study was to develop and test the structural model of a contraceptive behavior in Married Korean women. A hypothesis model was constructed on the basis of the health belief model, the theory of planned behavior and extensive literature review of contraception. The model was built by seven constructs. Four exogeneous variables included in the model were consisted of the contraceptive knowledges, the perceived threats, the sexual autonomy and the communication within couple. Four endogenous variables were consisted of the attitudes toward contraception, the perceived control, the ability to plan a intercourse and the contraceptive behaviors. Empirical data for testing the hypothetical model were collected by the self report questionnaires from 243 Korean married women. The questionnaires used in this study were developed by this researcher and their Cronbach's alpha scores were ranged from .60 to .88. The collected data were analyzed by SPSS program(ver. 8.0) for descriptive statistical analysis and LISREL program(ver. 8.12a) for covariance structural analysis. In the test of hypothetical model to the empirical data, the overall fitness indices were ฯ‡2=43.03, p=0.019, ฯ‡2/df=1.65, GFI=0.97, AGFI= 0.93, RMR=0.03, NNFI=0.97, NFI=0.97, CN=257.72. For the further parsimonious model, a modification model was constructed by deleting 4 paths in accordance with the statistical and theoretical criteria. In the final model, the overall fitness indices were ฯ‡2=20.54, p=0.77, ฯ‡2/df=0.79, GFI=0.99, AGFI= 0.96, RMR=0.03, NNFI=1.01, NFI=0.98, CN=538.87. The final model could explain the 80% of contraception behaviors. The results of testing hypothesis were followed : 1. The perceived threats(ฮณ=0.64, t=3.26) and the communications within couple(ฮณ=0.31, t=4.38) had a significant direct effect on the attitudes toward contraception. 2. The perceived threats(ฮณ=0.93, t=3.63) and the communications within couple couples(ฮณ=0.28, t=2.53) had a significant direct effect on the perceived control. 3. The communication between couples(ฮณ=0.28, t=2.53) had a significant direct effect on the ability to plan an intercourse. 4. The perceived threats had a significant indirect effect(ฮณ=0.87, t=3.42) and a total effect(ฮณ=1.11, t=3.03) on the contraceptive behavior. The communications within couple had a significant indirect effect(ฮณ=0.30, t=2.67)and a total effect(ฮณ=0.39, t=2.53) on the contraceptive behavior. And the attitudes toward contraception(ฮณ=0.33, t=1.99) and the perceived control(ฮณ=0.71, t=5.62) had a significant direct effect on the contraceptive behavior. 5. The contraceptive knowledge had a insignificant effect on the attitudes toward contraception, the perceived control and contraceptive behaviors. Also, sexual autonomy had an insignificant effect on the attitudes toward contraception, the perceived control and contraceptive behaviors. It could make the women practice contraception continually and correctly that they have the high perceived threats, the effective communication within couple, the positive attitudes toward contraception, and the high perceived control. On the basis of this results, it could be suggested that contraceptive behaviors be greatly affected by the perceived threats, the communications within couple, the attitudes toward contraception and the perceived control. Finally this model would be useful for the practice, theory and research of nursing.ope
    corecore