1,891 research outputs found

    Matchings in Random Biregular Bipartite Graphs

    Get PDF
    We study the existence of perfect matchings in suitably chosen induced subgraphs of random biregular bipartite graphs. We prove a result similar to a classical theorem of Erdos and Renyi about perfect matchings in random bipartite graphs. We also present an application to commutative graphs, a class of graphs that are featured in additive number theory.Comment: 30 pages and 3 figures - Latest version has updated introduction and bibliograph

    A point-line incidence identity in finite fields, and applications

    Full text link
    Let E⊆Fq2E \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q^2 be a set in the 2-dimensional vector space over a finite field with qq elements. We prove an identity for the second moment of its incidence function and deduce a variety of existing results from the literature, not all naturally associated with lines in Fq2\mathbb{F}_q^2, in a unified and elementary way.Comment: 30 page

    Products of Differences over Arbitrary Finite Fields

    Full text link
    There exists an absolute constant δ>0\delta > 0 such that for all qq and all subsets A⊆FqA \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q of the finite field with qq elements, if ∣A∣>q2/3−δ|A| > q^{2/3 - \delta}, then ∣(A−A)(A−A)∣=∣{(a−b)(c−d):a,b,c,d∈A}∣>q2. |(A-A)(A-A)| = |\{ (a -b) (c-d) : a,b,c,d \in A\}| > \frac{q}{2}. Any δ<1/13,542\delta < 1/13,542 suffices for sufficiently large qq. This improves the condition ∣A∣>q2/3|A| > q^{2/3}, due to Bennett, Hart, Iosevich, Pakianathan, and Rudnev, that is typical for such questions. Our proof is based on a qualitatively optimal characterisation of sets A,X⊆FqA,X \subseteq \mathbb{F}_q for which the number of solutions to the equation (a1−a2)=x(a3−a4) ,  a1,a2,a3,a4∈A,x∈X (a_1-a_2) = x (a_3-a_4) \, , \; a_1,a_2, a_3, a_4 \in A, x \in X is nearly maximum. A key ingredient is determining exact algebraic structure of sets A,XA, X for which ∣A+XA∣|A + XA| is nearly minimum, which refines a result of Bourgain and Glibichuk using work of Gill, Helfgott, and Tao. We also prove a stronger statement for (A−B)(C−D)={(a−b)(c−d):a∈A,b∈B,c∈C,d∈D} (A-B)(C-D) = \{ (a -b) (c-d) : a \in A, b \in B, c \in C, d \in D\} when A,B,C,DA,B,C,D are sets in a prime field, generalising a result of Roche-Newton, Rudnev, Shkredov, and the authors.Comment: 42 page
    • …
    corecore