4,530 research outputs found

    Aimhigher: Excellence Challenge: a policy evaluation using the Labour Force Survey

    Get PDF

    Fiscal Effects of Reforming the UK State Pension System

    Get PDF

    UK Annuitants

    Get PDF

    The Saving Gateway and the Child Trust Fund: Is asset-based welfare 'well fair'?

    Get PDF
    The 2001 Labour Party manifesto committed the government to introducing a 'Child Trust Fund' and a 'Saving Gateway' in the current parliament. This Commentary assesses these two policy proposals. It looks for possible rationales behind the government's plans for some form of asset-based welfare. It provides a discussion of many of the issues important to the design of the Child Trust Fund and the Saving Gateway. It also presents new evidence on the characteristics, incomes and savings of lower-income groups who might be eligible for the Saving Gateway

    Two cheers for the Pension Credit?

    Get PDF
    On 6 October 2003, the pension credit replaced the minimum income guarantee as the principal means-tested benefit for families containing an individual aged 60 or over. This Briefing Note examines the impact of this reform. A finding is that with regards to the government's objectives of giving more resources to low- to middle-income pensioners, rewarding pensioners for having saved in the past and encouraging people of working age to save for the future, the pension credit is likely to achieve the first two but not the third. This Briefing Note is set out as follows. Section 2 describes how the pension credit operates and why the problems that occurred with the Inland Revenue's administration of the new tax credits for families with children in April 2003 should not occur with the pension credit. The distributional impact of the reform is shown in Section 3. Section 4 discusses the inevitable problem of incomplete take-up of the new payment. Section 5 discusses the likely impact of the pension credit on saving and Section 6 discusses some of the longer-term issues that it raises. Section 7 concludes

    Differential mortality in the UK

    Get PDF
    In this paper we use the two waves of the British Retirement Survey (1988/89 and 1994) to quantify the relationship between socio-economic status and health outcomes. We find that, even after conditioning on the initial health status, wealth rankings are important determinants of mortality and the evolution of the health indicator in the survey. For men aged 65 moving from the 40th percentile to the 60th percentile in the wealth distribution increases the probability of survival by between 2.4 and 3.4 percentage points depending on the measure of wealth used. A slightly smaller effect is found for women of between 1.5 and 1.9 percentage points. In the process of estimating these effects we control for non-random attrition from our sample

    Differential mortality in the UK

    Get PDF

    Achieving simplicity, security and choice in retirement? An assessment of the government's proposed pensions reforms

    Get PDF
    On 17 December 2002, the government published a Department for Work and Pensions Green Paper about working and saving for retirementÒ± and a set of Inland Revenue proposals for reforms to the tax treatment of private pensions.2 Of the options explored in the two papers, it is claimed that ŃŽhese proposals for better information, simpler pensions, simplified tax treatment, better protection and more flexible retirement are designed to enable people to make their own choices for retirement' (DWP Green Paper, Summary, 66, 10). The perceived need for yet more reforms to the UK pension system seems to stem from the governmentÒł belief that Ń°erhaps 3 million people are seriously under-saving (or planning to retire too soon)' and that ŃĄ further group of between 5 and 10 million people may want to consider saving more or working longer' (DWP Green Paper, 3, 16, 36). In this Briefing Note, we discuss whether or not the proposed reforms are likely to help individuals to make choices about how to provide for their retirement that are appropriate to their circumstances. We focus particularly on whether or not the proposals might prompt those individuals who are not thought to be providing sufficiently for their retirement to save more each year or to retire at an older age than might otherwise have been the case. This would help alleviate concerns about underprovision. The structure of our discussion is as follows. Section 2 describes the main proposed reforms. Section 3 discusses whether they are likely help individuals to make saving decisions that are appropriate to their circumstances. Section 4 looks at how the reforms might affect retirement ages. Section 5 concludes

    The 2007 Comprehensive Spending Review: a challenging spending review?

    Get PDF
    In advance of the publication of the CSR, this briefing note examines what we already know about the CSR settlement, what remains to be announced and what this might imply for government departments and public services
    • 

    corecore