Pengadaan Tanah Untuk Kepentingan Umum (Perbandingan Antara Malaysia Dan Indonesia)

Land is a basic capital for human's life. As a basic capital, land has two functions: productive function and non-productive function. The needs of land use often clashed with each other since the amount of land is limited, in other side population grows rapidly. For the sake of development, every state in the world needs land. The development is related to land and needs land. During the practice of development, the program might clashed with the land which right already attributed or the land has already been possessed by person or legal entity. As the strategy to obtain that land, government uses the term of public interest. This research is a comparative research between Indonesia and Malaysia in providing land for public interest. The problem in this research is how the regulation take over the land and the concept of public interest in Indonesia and Malaysia.The result of the research shows that there is deviation of the meaning of public interest in both state which generates different perception in society related to land providing. Even so, land providing for public interest has already expressed into legislation in both states

Konsepsi Hak Menguasai Oleh Negara Atas Sumberdaya Agraria

The ideal aspiration which exists in the Authority Rights of a State conception is to place the State as a party who has the authority to regulate the use of the State property to the welfare of the society. The Aspiration requires a neutral State which is free from the interest of others, except the interest of social welfare. However, In the reality, State is not neutral from intervention of individual Interest or a group of people Interest on behalf of the public interest. Thus, the promise of the State to grant welfare to the society is merelyn on the normative level

Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Buruh Perempuan Pada Malam Hari

Both Act No. 13 on the year of 2003 and the Ministery Degree No. 244 on the Year 2003 have already regulated the protection of female workers in the night. Act No. 13 on the Year 2003 emphasizes sanction ifthere Is infrigements

Kaitan Kuasa Pertambangan dengan Hak-Hak Atas Tanah dalam Undang-Undang Pokok Agraria

This paper tries to emerge the phenomena of Mining Authority and Land Right in the Basic Principle of Agrarian Law. Argumentatively the Act of Mining No. 11, 1967 does not show any relationship to the considerance of the Principal Act of Agrarian (UUPA). its existence(UUPA) is not expiicitiy stated in the Body Frame, and is mentioned unclearly on Article 2 letter b of the Basic Principle of Agrarian Law (UUPA). The Article states that land rights are rights on the land area located in certain part of the earth based on the IndonesianLaw. This perception seems dear when the Indonesian Law is indefinitely elaborated. However, if it is traced, there is a close relationship between The Basic Principal of MiningAct and the Basic Principle of Agrarian Law