Prognostic Models in Head and Neck Oncology: Predictors and dynamics

Head and neck malignancies originating from the mucosal lining of the upper aerodigestive tract (head and neck squamous cell carcinoma’s: HNSCC’s) and the salivary glands make up nearly 5% of the total number of malignant tumours in the Netherlands. Variation of incidence trends between sites exist1, the general incidence of HNSCC’s is 17/100,000; the incidence of malignant salivary gland tumours 0.7/100,000 (Netherlands Cancer Registry). In this thesis we discuss prognostics in both types of cancer, although we focus on HNSCC’s. Once diagnosed with head and neck cancer, the prognosis (likely outcome of the disease) plays an enormous role in choosing treatment options and informing patients. Generally, survival rates for patients vary depending on the type and the stage (extent) of the cancer involved. The fi ve-years survival rate of patients (the percentage of patients who survive at least fi ve years after the cancer is detected) with HNSCC is around 50%. For those with salivary gland cancer this fi gure is highly dependent on the type of tumour and diff ers between 30% to nearly 100%. The prognosis at the time of diagnosis of cancer is taken into account in the choice of treatment. When it comes to informing patients about their prognosis, physicians also incorporate events such as staying free for cancer or the occurrence of a non related health event (eg. myocardial infarction) during follow up. The methods of determination of prognosis, the way prognosis changes over time and the way in which prognosis should be discussed with patients are the central themes of this thesis. This introduction aims to explore the concept of prognosis, the fallibility of prognostic factors, the statistical methods used when working with prognostic factors and the role prognosis plays in the process of decision-making. Finally, we will state the central hypotheses for this thesis

Child- and Environment-Related Factors Influencing Daily Cochlear Implant Use: A Datalog Study

Objectives: To understand the varying levels of daily cochlear implant (CI) use in children, previous studies have investigated factors that may be of influence. The objective of this study was to investigate the degree with which new child-related and environment-related characteristics were associated with consistent CI use. Design: The design of this study was retrospective. Data were reviewed of 81 children (51% females, mean age 6.4 years with a range of 1.3 to 17.7 years) who received a CI between 2012 and 2019. Developmental status, quantified burden of comorbidity, hearing experience, and hearing environment were investigated for correlation with consistency in daily CI use. The CIs datalog was used to objectively record the wearing times. Associations were examined using univariate correlation analyses and a linear regression analysis. Results: On average, the CI was worn 8.6hr per day and 59% of the children wore it more than 8 hr daily. The latter children’s hearing performance was significantly higher than that of the others. Consistency in CI use correlated significantly with the child-related characteristics chronological age, nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, pre CI acoustic experience, CI experience, and one of the environment related characteristics “parental communication mode.” In a multivariate linear regression model, consistency in CI use was significantly dependent on nonverbal IQ and parental communication mode. These together accounted for 47% of the variation in daily CI use. Conclusions: The findings indicate that children with lower nonverbal IQ scores and low exposure to oral communication by their parents are at risk of inconsistent CI use

Repeated audiometry after bacterial meningitis: Consequences for future management

Objective: Sensorineural hearing loss is a common sequela of bacterial meningitis. The objective of this study is to delineate the incidence and course of hearing loss after bacterial meningitis. Study Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Tertiary referral center. Patients: Data of 655 patients who suffered from bacterial meningitis between 1985 and 2015 were analyzed. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measurements: Availability of audiometric data, incidence of hearing loss, and onset and course of hearing loss. Results: In this cohort the incidence of hearing loss (>25 dB) was 28% (95% confidence interval 23-34%). The incidence of profound hearing loss (>80 dB) was 13% (95% confidence interval 10-18%). Normal hearing at the first assessment after treatment for meningitis remained stable over time in all these patients. In 19 of the 28 patients with diagnosed hearing loss, the hearing level remained stable over time. Hearing improved in six patients and deteriorated in two patients. One patient showed a fluctuating unilateral hearing loss. Conclusion: Audiological tests in patients with bacterial meningitis, especially children, should be started as soon as possible after the acute phase is over. As we found no deterioration of initial normal hearing after bacterial meningitis, repeated audiometry seems indicated only for those with diagnosed hearing loss at first assessment

Child- and Environment-Related Factors Influencing Daily Cochlear Implant Use: A Datalog Study

OBJECTIVES: To understand the varying levels of daily cochlear implant (CI) use in children, previous studies have investigated factors that may be of influence. The objective of this study was to investigate the degree with which new child-related and environment-related characteristics were associated with consistent CI use. DESIGN: The design of this study was retrospective. Data were reviewed of 81 children (51% females, mean age 6.4 years with a range of 1.3 to 17.7 years) who received a CI between 2012 and 2019. Developmental status, quantified burden of comorbidity, hearing experience, and hearing environment were investigated for correlation with consistency in daily CI use. The CIs datalog was used to objectively record the wearing times. Associations were examined using univariate correlation analyses and a linear regression analysis. RESULTS: On average, the CI was worn 8.6 hr per day and 59% of the children wore it more than 8 hr daily. The latter children's hearing performance was significantly higher than that of the others. Consistency in CI use correlated significantly with the child-related characteristics chronological age, nonverbal intelligence quotient (IQ), American Society of Anesthesiologists physical status class, pre CI acoustic experience, CI experience, and one of the environment related characteristics "parental communication mode." In a multivariate linear regression model, consistency in CI use was significantly dependent on nonverbal IQ and parental communication mode. These together accounted for 47% of the variation in daily CI use. CONCLUSIONS: The findings indicate that children with lower nonverbal IQ scores and low exposure to oral communication by their parents are at risk of inconsistent CI use

A Retrospective Analysis and Comparison of the STAM and STAMCO Classification and EAONO/JOS Cholesteatoma Staging System in Predicting Surgical Treatment Outcomes of Middle Ear Cholesteatoma

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate and compare the STAM classification, STAMCO classification and the EAONO/JOS staging system as predictors for cholesteatoma recidivism and postoperative hearing, using a large patient cohort in our tertiary referral center. METHOD: Two hundred thirty-one patients who underwent surgery for primary cholesteatoma between 2003 and December 2012 were included and retrospectively classified and staged according to the STAM classification, STAMCO classification, and EAONO/JOS staging system. Data on cholesteatoma recidivism rates and postoperative hearing were collected. The predictive value of the three instruments for recurrent and residual cholesteatoma was compared by using receiver operating characteristic curves. RESULTS: For predicting recurrent cholesteatoma, the STAMCO classification was significantly superior compared to the other two instruments. For predicting residual cholesteatoma, the STAMCO classification was superior to the EANO/JOS Staging system. The postoperative hearing shows a significant increase in ABG with increasing extension of cholesteatoma in the CWU group and a significant decrease in AC threshold level with increasing stage and a significant increase in AC with increasing ossicular chain status in the CWD group. CONCLUSION: Based on our study, the STAMCO classification represents the best available predictor for recurrent cholesteatoma and holds most promise for predicting residual cholesteatoma. Extension of cholesteatoma seems to be linked to postoperative hearing and thus the classifications and staging systems may be able to predict postoperative hearing. More studies are needed to assess the validation of these classifications

A directional remote-microphone for bimodal cochlear implant recipients

To evaluate whether speech recognition in noise differs according to whether a wireless remote microphone is connected to just the cochlear implant (CI) or to both the CI and to the hearing aid (HA) in bimodal CI users. The second aim was to evaluate the additional benefit of the directional microphone mode compared with the omnidirectional microphone mode of the wireless microphone. This prospective study measured Speech Recognition Thresholds (SRT) in babble noise in a ‘within-subjects repeated measures design’ for different listening conditions. Eighteen postlingually deafened adult bimodal CI users. No difference in speech recognition in noise in the bimodal listening condition was found between the wireless microphone connected to the CI only and to both the CI and the HA. An improvement of 4.1 dB was found for switching from the omnidirectional microphone mode to the directional mode in the CI only condition. The use of a wireless microphone improved speech recognition in noise for bimodal CI users. The use of the directional microphone mode led to a substantial additional improvement of speech perception in noise for situations with one target signal

Noncompliance to guidelines in head and neck cancer treatment; associated factors for both patient and physician

Background: Decisions on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) treatment are widely recognized as being difficult, due to high morbidity, often involving vital functions. Some patients may therefore decline standard, curative treatment. In addition doctors may propose alternative, nonstandard treatments. Little attention is devoted, both in literature and in daily practice, to understanding why and when HNSCC patients or their physicians decline standard, curative treatment modalities. Our objective is to determine factors associated with noncompliance in head and neck cancer treatment for both patients and physicians and to assess the influence of patient compliance on prognosis. Methods: We did a retrospective study based on the medical records of 829 patients with primary HNSCC, who were eligible for curative treatment and referred to our hospital between 2010 and 2012. We analyzed treatment choice and reasons for nonstandard treatment decisions, survival, age, gender, social network, tumor site, cTNM classification, and comorbidity (ACE27). Multivariate analysis using logistic regression methods was performed to determine predictive factors associated with non-standard treatment following physician or patient decision. To gain insight in survival of the different groups of patients, we applied a Cox regression analysis. After checking the proportional hazards assumption for each variable, we adjusted the survival analysis for gender, age, tumor site, tumor stage, comorbidity and a history of having a prior tumor. Results: 17 % of all patients with a primary HNSCC did not receive standard curative treatment, either due to nonstandard treatment advice (10 %) or due to the patient choosing an alternative (7 %). A further 3 % of all patients refused any type of therapy, even though they were considered eligible for curative treatment. Elderliness, single marital status, female gender, high tumor stage and severe comorbidity are predictive factors. Patients declining standard treatment have a lower overall 3-year survival (34 % vs. 70 %). Conclusions: Predictive factors for nonstandard treatment decisions in head and neck cancer treatment differed between the treating physician and the patient. Patients who received nonstandard treatment had a lower overall 3-year survival. These findings should be taken into account when counselling patients in whom nonstandard treatment is considered

The Effect of Binaural Beamforming Technology on Speech Intelligibility in Bimodal Cochlear Implant Recipients

Although the benefit of bimodal listening in cochlear implant users has been agreed on, speech comprehension remains a challenge in acoustically complex real-life environments due to reverberation and disturbing background noises. One way to additionally improve bimodal auditory performance is the use of directional microphones. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of a binaural beamformer for bimodal cochlear implant (CI) users. This prospective study measured speech reception thresholds (SRT) in noise in a repeated-measures design that varied in listening modality for static and dynamic listening conditions. A significant improvement in SRT of 4.7 dB was found with the binaural beamformer switched on in the bimodal static listening condition. No significant improvement was found in the dynamic listening condition. We conclude that there is a clear additional advantage of the binaural beamformer in bimodal CI users for predictable/static listening conditions with frontal target speech and spatially separated noise sources

Management and outcomes of obstructive sleep apnea in children with Robin sequence, a cross-sectional study

Objective: The objective of this cross-sectional study is to assess the prevalence, course, and management of obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) in children with Robin sequence (RS) aged 1–18 years. Materials and methods: A cross-sectional study was conducted in 63 children aged 1 to18 years with RS. Patient data were collected on baseline characteristics and management. OSA was evaluated by polysomnography. Results: Sixty-three children with RS were included (median age 8.0 years) and divided into two groups based on the initial treatment: prone positioning or respiratory support. Respiratory support was more often indicated in children with a non-isolated RS (p < 0.05). At cross section, in the prone positioning group (n = 32), one child was diagnosed with OSA. In the respiratory support group (n = 31), 13 children (42 %) had respiratory problems of whom 10 needed respiratory support. Conclusions: Between the age of 1 and 18 years, almost one out of four children with RS still has respiratory problems. Children with RS, who can be treated with prone positioning only as an infant, are not likely to develop obstructive airway problems at a later age. In contrast, children who need respiratory support early after birth are at risk of continuing or re-developing OSA after the age of 1 year. Clinical relevance: This study shows that those who need respiratory support at an early age need careful monitoring until adulthood