DNA-Based coatings in implantology: utilization of structural properties of the DNA-module to modulate cell and tissue response.

Contains fulltext : 30220_dnabcoini.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)RU Radboud Universiteit Nijmegen, 15 maart 2007Promotores : Jansen, J.A., Nolte, R.J.M. Co-promotores : Walboomers, X.F., Sommerdijk, N.A.J.M.133 p

Electrosprayed Enzyme Coatings as Bioinspired Alternatives to Bioceramic Coatings for Orthopedic and Oral Implants

Contains fulltext : 80824.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access

Biomaterial-based possibilities for managing peri-implantitis

Contains fulltext : 218148.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)Peri-implantitis is an inflammatory disease of hard and soft tissues around osseointegrated implants, followed by a progressive damage of alveolar bone. Oral microorganisms can adhere to all types of surfaces by the production of multiple adhesive factors. Inherent properties of materials will influence not only the number of microorganisms, but also their profile and adhesion force onto the material surface. In this perspective, strategies to reduce the adhesion of pathogenic microorganisms on dental implants and their components should be investigated in modern rehabilitation concepts in implant dentistry. To date, several metallic nanoparticle films have been developed to reduce the growth of pathogenic bacteria. However, the main drawback in these approaches is the potential toxicity and accumulative effect of the metals over time. In view of biological issues and in attempt to prevent and/or treat peri-implantitis, biomaterials as carriers of antimicrobial substances have attracted special attention for application as coatings on dental implant devices. This review will focus on biomaterial-based possibilities to prevent and/or treat peri-implantitis by describing concepts and dental implant components suitable for engagement in preventing and treating this disease. Additionally, we raise important criteria referring to the geometric parameters of dental implants and their components, which can directly affect peri-implant tissue conditions. Finally, we overview currently available biomaterial systems that can be used in the field of oral implantology

Bone regenerative properties of rat, goat and human platelet-rich plasma.

Contains fulltext : 80731.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access)To explore the reported contradictory osteogenic capacity of platelet-rich plasma (PRP), the aim of the study was to examine and compare the bone regenerative effect of: PRPs of different species (rat, goat, human); human bone graft (HB) vs. HB combined with human PRP (HB+hPRP); and HB+hPRP vs. synthetic hydroxyapatite-tricalcium phosphate bone substitute combined with hPRP (HA/TCP+hPRP). For this purpose, 72 implants, divided into 6 groups (n=6) were inserted in critical-sized defects of immunodeficient rats. After 2 and 4 weeks, descriptive and quantitative histological, and micro-CT analyses were performed on the specimens. Rat and goat PRP combined with HA/TCP did not enhance bone regeneration compared with HA/TCP. In contrast, human PRP combined with HA/TCP resulted in significantly increased bone fill compared to HA/TCP. The addition of human PRP to human bone graft increased significantly the amount of newly formed bone after 2 weeks. HB+hPRP demonstrated enhanced bone healing compared to HA/TCP+hPRP. In conclusion, rat and goat PRP had no effect on bone formation. Human PRP improved the initial osteogenic response of human bone graft. Human PRP combined with human bone graft had better osteogenic capacity than human PRP combined with synthetic bone substitute

Efficiency of coculture with angiogenic cells or physiological BMP-2 administration on improving osteogenic differentiation and bone formation of MSCs

Item does not contain fulltex

The performance of CPC/PLGA and Bio-Oss((R)) for bone regeneration in healthy and osteoporotic rats

Item does not contain fulltex