Demographic patterns and outcomes of patients in level I trauma centers in three international trauma systems

Introduction: Trauma systems were developed to improve the care for the injured. The designation and elements comprising these systems vary across countries. In this study, we have compared the demographic patterns and patient outcomes of Level I trauma centers in three international trauma systems. Methods: International multicenter prospective trauma registry-based study, performed in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, the Netherlands, John Hunter Hospital (JHH), Newcastle, Australia, and Harborview Medical Center (HMC), Seattle, the United States. Inclusion: patients =18 years, admitted in 2012, registered in the institutional trauma registry. Results: In UMCU, JHH, and HMC, respectively, 955, 1146, and 4049 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 300, 412, and 1375 patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Mean ISS was higher in JHH (13.5; p < 0.001) and HMC (13.4; p < 0.001) compared to UMCU (11.7). Unadjusted mortality: UMCU = 6.5 %, JHH = 3.6 %, and HMC = 4.8 %. Adjusted odds of death: JHH = 0.498 [95 % confidence interval (CI) 0.303-0.818] and HMC = 0.473 (95 % CI 0.325-0.690) compared to UMCU. HMC compared to JHH was 1.002 (95 % CI 0.664-1.514). Odds of death patients ISS > 15: JHH = 0.507 (95 % CI 0.300-0.857) and HMC = 0.451 (95 % CI 0.297-0.683) compared to UMCU. HMC = 0.931 (95 % CI 0.608-1.425) compared to JHH. TRISS analysis: UMCU: Ws = 0.787, Z = 1.31, M = 0.87; JHH, Ws = 3.583, Z = 6.7, M = 0.89; HMC, Ws = 3.902, Z = 14.6, M = 0.84. Conclusion: This study demonstrated substantial differences across centers in patient characteristics and mortality, mainly of neurological cause. Future research must investigate whether the outcome differences remain with nonfatal and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, we must focus on the development of a more valid method to compare systems

Incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome and associated mortality in a polytrauma population

Background: The incidence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) has decreased in the last decade by improvement in trauma and critical care. However, it still remains a major cause of morbidity and mortality. This study investigated the current incidence and mortality of ARDS in polytrauma patients. Methods: A 4.5-year prospective study included consecutive trauma patients admitted to a level 1 trauma center intensive care unit (ICU). Isolated head injuries, drowning, asphyxiation, burns, and deaths <48 hours were excluded. Demographics, Injury Severity Score (ISS), physiologic parameters, resuscitation parameters, Denver Multiple Organ Failure scores, and ARDS data according to Berlin criteria were prospectively collected. Data are presented as median (IQR), and p<0.05 was considered significant. Results: 241 patients were included. The median age was 45 (27-59) years, 178 (74%) were male, the ISS was 29 (22-36), and 232 (96%) patients had blunt injuries. Thirty-one patients (13%) died. Fifteen patients (6%) developed ARDS. The median time to ARDS onset was 3 (2-5) days after injury. The median duration of ARDS was 2.5 (1-3.5) days. All patients with ARDS were male compared with 61% of non-ARDS patients (p=0.003). Patients who developed ARDS had higher ISS (30 vs. 25, p=0.01), lower Partial Pressure of Oxygen in arterial blood (PaO2) both in the emergency department and ICU, and higher Partial Pressure of Carbon Dioxide in arterial blood (PaCo2) in the ICU. Patients with ARDS needed more crystalloids <24 hours (8.7 vs. 6.8 L, p=0.03), received more fresh frozen plasma <24 hours (3 vs. 0 U, p=0.04), and more platelet <8 hours and <24 hours. Further, they stayed longer on the ventilator (11 vs. 2 days, p<0.001), longer in the ICU (12 vs. 3 days, p<0.001), and in the hospital (33 vs. 15 days, p=0.004). Patients with ARDS developed more often multiple organ dysfunction syndrome (40% vs. 3%, p<0.001) and died more often (20% vs. 3%, p=0.01). Only one patient with ARDS (7%) died of ARDS. Discussion: In this polytrauma population mortality was predominantly caused by brain injury. The incidence of ARDS was low; its presentation was only early onset, during a short time period, and accompanied by low mortality. Level of evidence: Level III

The association of patient and trauma characteristics with the health-related quality of life in a Dutch trauma population

BACKGROUND: It is suggested in literature to use the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as an outcome indicator for evaluating trauma centre performances. In order to predict HRQoL, characteristics that could be of influence on a predictive model should be identified. This study identifies patient and injury characteristics associated with the HRQoL in a general trauma population. METHODS: Retrospective study of trauma patients admitted from 1st January 2007 through 31th December 2012. Patients were aged ≥18 years and discharged alive from the level I trauma centre. A combined health survey (SF-36 and EQ-5D) was sent to all traceable patients. The subdomain outcomes and EQ-5D index value (EQ-5Di) were compared with the reference population. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify parameters associated parameters with the HRQoL outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1870 patients were included for analyses. Compared to the eligible population, included patients were significantly older, more severely injured, more often admitted in the ICU and had a longer admission duration. The SF-36 and EQ-5Di were significantly lower compared to the Dutch reference population. The variables age, Injury Severity Score, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, and severe injury to the head and extremities were associated with the HRQoL in the majority of the subdomains. DISCUSSION: In order to use HRQoL as an indicator for trauma centre performances, there should be a consensus of the ideal timing for the measurement of HRQoL post-injury and the appropriate HRQoL instrument. Furthermore, standardised HRQoL outcomes must be developed. CONCLUSION: This study revealed eight factors (described above) which could be used to predict the HRQoL in trauma patients

The association of patient and trauma characteristics with the health-related quality of life in a Dutch trauma population

BACKGROUND: It is suggested in literature to use the Health Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) as an outcome indicator for evaluating trauma centre performances. In order to predict HRQoL, characteristics that could be of influence on a predictive model should be identified. This study identifies patient and injury characteristics associated with the HRQoL in a general trauma population. METHODS: Retrospective study of trauma patients admitted from 1st January 2007 through 31th December 2012. Patients were aged ≥18 years and discharged alive from the level I trauma centre. A combined health survey (SF-36 and EQ-5D) was sent to all traceable patients. The subdomain outcomes and EQ-5D index value (EQ-5Di) were compared with the reference population. A linear regression analysis was performed to identify parameters associated parameters with the HRQoL outcome. RESULTS: A total of 1870 patients were included for analyses. Compared to the eligible population, included patients were significantly older, more severely injured, more often admitted in the ICU and had a longer admission duration. The SF-36 and EQ-5Di were significantly lower compared to the Dutch reference population. The variables age, Injury Severity Score, hospital length of stay, ICU length of stay, Revised Trauma Score, probability of survival, and severe injury to the head and extremities were associated with the HRQoL in the majority of the subdomains. DISCUSSION: In order to use HRQoL as an indicator for trauma centre performances, there should be a consensus of the ideal timing for the measurement of HRQoL post-injury and the appropriate HRQoL instrument. Furthermore, standardised HRQoL outcomes must be developed. CONCLUSION: This study revealed eight factors (described above) which could be used to predict the HRQoL in trauma patients

Base deficit from the first peripheral venous sample: a surrogate for arterial base deficit in the trauma bay

Arterial base deficit (ABD) measurement is a standard test for assessment of the trauma patient's metabolic response to shock. Venous blood is readily available earlier during the trauma resuscitation. The aim of this study is to analyze the difference (correlation, agreement, clinical significance) between the first peripheral venous base deficit (pVBD) and the first ABD during trauma resuscitation. Consecutive trauma patients >18 years presenting to John Hunter Hospital (JHH), Newcastle, Australia, from January 2007 until July 2007 requiring arterial blood gas sampling had a peripheral venous blood gas performed simultaneously. A survey of JHH trauma clinicians and members of the American Association for the Surgery of Trauma was performed to determine a clinically relevant difference between two serial base deficit measurements. Pearson correlation and Bland-Altman tests were performed. During the 7-month period, 127 patients (79% men, mean age, 46.3 [±18.4 years] and median injury severity score of 15 [interquartile range, 8–23; range, 1–75]) were included into the study. The average peripheral ABD (pABD) and pVBD were −2.2 mmol/L ± 3.8 mmol/L and −1.3 mmol/L ± 3.8 mmol/L, respectively. The average difference between measurements was 0.9 (range, −1.7 to +3.5; 95% confidence interval, 0.7–1.0) with pVBD > pABD. The Pearson test showed highly significant correlation (r = 0.97, p < 0.0001). The survey of 11 JHH and 56 American Association for the Surgery of Trauma clinicians determined 2 mmol/L as clinically relevant difference between two base deficit measurements. All individual paired sample's difference sat within the clinically relevant limits and >95% (121 of 127) of samples sat within the 1.96 standard deviation acceptable by the Bland-Altman plot. There is near perfect correlation and clinically acceptable agreement between pABD and pVBD values on simultaneous testing. pVBD is an acceptable test to assess trauma patients' initial metabolic status when occult blood loss suspected

Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review

PURPOSE: Traumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries. The most common mechanism of injury is direct blunt trauma to the anterior chest wall. Most (> 95%) sternal fractures are treated conservatively. Surgical fixation is indicated in case of fracture instability, displacement or non-union. However, limited research has been performed on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current treatment practices and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published from 1990 to June 2017 was conducted. Original studies on traumatic sternal fractures, reporting sternal healing or sternal stability were included. Studies on non-traumatic sternal fractures or not reporting sternal healing outcomes, as well as case reports (n = 1), were excluded. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in this review, which reported treatment outcomes for 191 patients. Most included studies were case series of poor quality. All patients showed sternal healing and 98% reported pain relief. Treatment complications occurred in 2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations is an underexposed topic. Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality

Current treatment and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures-a systematic review

PURPOSE: Traumatic sternal fractures are rare injuries. The most common mechanism of injury is direct blunt trauma to the anterior chest wall. Most (> 95%) sternal fractures are treated conservatively. Surgical fixation is indicated in case of fracture instability, displacement or non-union. However, limited research has been performed on treatment outcomes. This study aimed to provide an overview of the current treatment practices and outcomes of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations. METHODS: A systematic review of literature published from 1990 to June 2017 was conducted. Original studies on traumatic sternal fractures, reporting sternal healing or sternal stability were included. Studies on non-traumatic sternal fractures or not reporting sternal healing outcomes, as well as case reports (n = 1), were excluded. RESULTS: Sixteen studies were included in this review, which reported treatment outcomes for 191 patients. Most included studies were case series of poor quality. All patients showed sternal healing and 98% reported pain relief. Treatment complications occurred in 2% of patients. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment of traumatic sternal fractures and dislocations is an underexposed topic. Although all patients in this review displayed sternal healing, results should be interpreted with caution since most included studies were of poor quality

Neutrophil heterogeneity and its role in infectious complications after severe trauma

Background: Trauma leads to a complex inflammatory cascade that induces both immune activation and a refractory immune state in parallel. Although both components are deemed necessary for recovery, the balance is tight and easily lost. Losing the balance can lead to life-threatening infectious complications as well as long-term immunosuppression with recurrent infections. Neutrophils are known to play a key role in these processes. Therefore, this review focuses on neutrophil characteristics and function after trauma and how these features can be used to identify trauma patients at risk for infectious complications. Results: Distinct neutrophil subtypes exist that play their own role in the recovery and/or development of infectious complications after trauma. Furthermore, the refractory immune state is related to the risk of infectious complications. These findings change the initial concepts of the immune response after trauma and give rise to new biomarkers for monitoring and predicting inflammatory complications in severely injured patients. Conclusion: For early recognition of patients at risk, the immune system should be monitored. Several neutrophil biomarkers show promising results and analysis of these markers has become accessible to such extent that they can be used for point-of-care decision making after trauma

Demographic Patterns and Outcomes of Patients in Level i Trauma Centers in Three International Trauma Systems

Introduction: Trauma systems were developed to improve the care for the injured. The designation and elements comprising these systems vary across countries. In this study, we have compared the demographic patterns and patient outcomes of Level I trauma centers in three international trauma systems. Methods: International multicenter prospective trauma registry-based study, performed in the University Medical Center Utrecht (UMCU), Utrecht, the Netherlands, John Hunter Hospital (JHH), Newcastle, Australia, and Harborview Medical Center (HMC), Seattle, the United States. Inclusion: patients ≥18 years, admitted in 2012, registered in the institutional trauma registry. Results: In UMCU, JHH, and HMC, respectively, 955, 1146, and 4049 patients met the inclusion criteria of which 300, 412, and 1375 patients with Injury Severity Score (ISS) > 15. Mean ISS was higher in JHH (13.5; p 15: JHH = 0.507 (95 % CI 0.300-0.857) and HMC = 0.451 (95 % CI 0.297-0.683) compared to UMCU. HMC = 0.931 (95 % CI 0.608-1.425) compared to JHH. TRISS analysis: UMCU: Ws = 0.787, Z = 1.31, M = 0.87; JHH, Ws = 3.583, Z = 6.7, M = 0.89; HMC, Ws = 3.902, Z = 14.6, M = 0.84. Conclusion: This study demonstrated substantial differences across centers in patient characteristics and mortality, mainly of neurological cause. Future research must investigate whether the outcome differences remain with nonfatal and long-term outcomes. Furthermore, we must focus on the development of a more valid method to compare systems