Five-Year Outcomes of the SuperB Trial:A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Heparin-Bonded Endograft to Surgical Femoropopliteal Bypass

Objective: This study aims to compare the 5-year outcomes of endoluminal bypass (EB) using heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents versus bypass surgery for extensive femoropopliteal disease, including technical and clinical outcomes and health status. Background: The surgical femoropopliteal bypass was the gold standard to treat peripheral arterial disease (PAD) for decades; however, endovascular treatment modalities are now recommended for most femoropopliteal lesions. One-year data of a randomized controlled trial comparing EB with surgical bypass (SB) have shown a faster recovery, less morbidity, and comparable patency rates between the two techniques. To date, long-term randomized controlled data regarding both techniques are lacking. Methods: Five-year results of a multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing EB with SB in patients with femoropopliteal artery disease were evaluated based on intention-to-treat and per-protocol analyses. Results: At 5-year follow-up, primary, primary-assisted, and secondary patency rates were 36.2%, 52.4%, and 68.1% for EB and 49.4%, 72.2%, and 77.8% for SB, respectively (p=0.608). Freedom from target lesion revascularization (fTLR) was 34.1% for EB and 57.6% for SB (p=0.365). In both groups, the ankle-brachial index, Rutherford classification, and walking distance significantly improved compared with baseline without differences between groups at follow-up. Freedom from major amputation rate was 92.6% in the EB group and 96.2% in the SB group (p=0.361). The 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey showed no significant differences between groups. Conclusion: Treatment of extensive femoropopliteal disease with self-expanding covered stents provides comparable clinical-related and health-related questionnaire outcomes when compared with SB through 5 years of follow-up. However, the EB is related to a higher number of reinterventions. Clinical Impact: This present study is the first to report five-year outcomes comparing an endoluminal (EB) using heparin-bonded self-expanding covered stents with surgical bypass (SB) for long and complex femoropopliteal disease. Although the advantages of treatment with EB are mostly seen in the early period after treatment, the outcomes support the use of EB for this indication and seems to be a valid and safe alternative for bypass surgery. Future trials comparing various endovascular strategies may provide further guidance for the development of an evidence-based treatment algorithm.</p

1-Year Results of a Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Heparin-Bonded Endoluminal to Femoropopliteal Bypass

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to compare heparin-bonded endografts with femoropopliteal bypass, including quality of life, using general health and disease-specific questionnaires as well as patency rates. BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment continues to advance and is gaining acceptance as primary treatment for long occlusive or stenotic lesions in the superficial femoral artery. Heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene endografts have been related to outcomes comparable to bypass surgery, but this has not been tested in a randomized fashion. METHODS: A multicenter randomized-controlled trial was performed comparing femoropopliteal bypass with heparin-bonded expanded polytetrafluoroethylene endografts. Data were analyzed on an intention-to-treat and per-protocol manner. RESULTS: A total of 129 patients were randomized and 125 patients were treated, 63 in the endoluminal and 62 in the surgical group (42 venous, 20 prosthetic). Enrollment was terminated before reaching the predefined target number for patency. Baseline characteristics and anatomical data were similar. Patients were treated for critical limb ischemia in 38.1% and 32.2% in the endoluminal and surgical arms, respectively. Mean lesion length was 23 cm in both groups and lesions were largely TransAtlantic Inter-Society Consensus II D. Hospitalization time and 30-day morbidity were significantly lower in the endoluminal group, without differences in serious adverse events (n = 5 each; surgical: 4 venous and 1 polytetrafluoroethylene bypass). There were no significant differences in Rutherford category between groups at any time point. At 30 days the endoluminal group showed a greater improvement in quality-of-life scores. At 1 year, these differences had largely disappeared and no differences in primary (endoluminal: 64.8%; surgical: 63.6%), assisted primary (endoluminal: 78.1%; surgical: 79.8%), secondary patency (endoluminal: 85.9%; surgical: 83.3%), and target vessel revascularization (endoluminal: 72.1%; surgical: 71.0%) were observed. Limb salvage rate was 100% in both groups. CONCLUSIONS: Heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass for long segment lesions shows promising results (less morbidity, faster recovery, and improvement in quality of life with indistinguishable patency rates at 1 year) compared with surgical bypass. Long-term results have to be awaited

SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass: SUPERB-trial; Heparin-bonded endoluminal versus surgical femoro-popliteal bypass: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial

Contains fulltext : 96315.pdf (publisher's version ) (Open Access)BACKGROUND: Endovascular treatment options for the superficial femoral artery are evolving rapidly. For long lesions, the venous femoropopliteal bypass considered to be superior above the prosthetic bypass. An endoluminal bypass, however, may provide equal patency rates compared to the prosthetic above knee bypass. The introduction of heparin-bonded endografts may further improve patency rates. The SUrgical versus PERcutaneous Bypass (SuperB) study is designed to assess whether a heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass provides equal patency rates compared to the venous bypass and to prove that it is associated with improved quality of life, related to a decreased complication rate, or not. METHODS/DESIGN: Two-hundred-twenty-two patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease, category 3-6 according to Rutherford, will be randomized in two treatment arms; 1. the surgical femoro-popliteal bypass, venous whenever possible, and 2. the heparin-bonded endoluminal bypass. The power analysis was based on a non-inferiority principle, with an effect size of 90% and 10% margins (alpha 5%, power 80%). Patients will be recruited from 5 teaching hospitals in the Netherlands during a 2-year period. The primary endpoint is primary patency and quality of life evaluated by the RAND-36 questionnaire and the Walking Impairment Questionnaire. Secondary endpoints include secondary patency, freedom-from-TLR and complications. DISCUSSION: The SuperB trial is a multicentre randomized controlled trial designed to show non-inferiority in patency rates of the heparin-bonded endograft compared to the surgical bypass for treatment of long SFA lesions, and to prove a better quality of life using the heparin bonded-endograft compared to surgically treatment, related to a reduction in complications. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Clinicaltrials: NCT01220245

Efficacy of treatment of edge stenosis of endografts inserted for superficial femoral artery stenotic disease

ObjectiveThe role of endografts in the treatment of extensive superficial femoral artery (SFA) occlusive disease is enlarging. Results are limited by the occurrence of edge stenosis. The aim of the study was to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of treatment of edge stenosis of endografts inserted for SFA occlusive disease. MethodsAll patients, treated between November 2001 and December 2011, with a self-expandable polytetrafluoroethylene-endograft were gathered in a prospective database in three hospitals. The incidence of primary edge stenosis and the incidence of re-edge stenosis after treatment were retrospectively noted and a comparison was made between the results of percutaneous transluminal angioplasty (PTA) and extension of the endograft. ResultsA total of 88 patients presented with 115 edge stenoses, of which the majority presented within 1 year after insertion of the endograft (mean time to edge stenosis 10.78.2 months). Seventy-three stenoses (63%) manifested at the proximal and 42 at the distal edge (37%). The 1-year incidence of restenosis and/or occlusion was 45% after PTA and 43% after endograft extension, with 1-year patency rates of 81% and 92%, respectively. The incidence of restenosis/occlusion after treatment with PTA was 12% higher at two years compared to extension of the endograft (55% vs. 43%, respectively). ConclusionEdge stenosis may well be treated with either PTA or extension of the endograft. The incidence of restenosis and/or occlusion after both PTA and extension is high, but patency rates are acceptable. Aggressive surveillance is needed during the first year after insertion. (c) 2015 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

Outcome of Thrombolysis and Thrombectomy for Thrombosed Endografts Inserted in the Superficial Femoral Artery for Occlusive Disease

Purpose: To evaluate the efficacy and outcome of thrombolysis and thrombectonny for thronnbosed polytetrafluoroethylene stent-grafts inserted in the superficial femoral artery (SFA) for occlusive disease. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 79 consecutive patients with a thrombosed SFA endograft between November 2001 and December 2011. Of these, 46 (58%) were treated with thrombolysis (n=40, 87%) or thrombectomy 13%) and form the study group (33 men; median age 66.8 years, range 30-80). Median time from stent-graft insertion to thrombosis was 3 months (range 0-53). Results: Thrombolysis was successful in 38 (95%) patients over a mean 24 hours (range 3 48); one patient had failed lysis and another died during lytic treatment. Thrombectomy was successful in all 6 patients. Thrombosis without a causal lesion was significantly more common in occlusions that presented Conclusion: Thronnbolysis and thrombectonny of thrombosed endografts in the SEA is effective and safe. Patency rates after treatment are moderate, but prolonged secondary patency can be achieved