Dutch translation and validation of the Norwich Patellar Instability score and Banff Patella Instability Instrument in patients after surgery for patellar instability

PurposeRecently, two new English specific patient reported outcome measures (PROMs) to evaluate treatment of patients with patellofemoral complaints have been developed: the Banff Patella Instability Instrument (BPII) and the Norwich Patellar Instability (NPI) score.  This study was designed to translate and validate the BPII and NPI in Dutch patients after surgical treatment for patellar instability.MethodsForward and backward translation of the outcome measures was performed. Patients who had been surgically treated for patellar instability filled out the NPI and BPII together with the Kujala Knee Score, numeric rating scales, Knee disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) and SF-36.  We assessed internal consistency and construct validity. We evaluated the presence of ceiling and floor effects.ResultsNinety-seven patients completed the online questionnaires. The internal consistency of the NPI and BPII score was excellent for both outcome measures. The BPII and NPI had good correlations with other PROMs. For the BPII we found no floor nor ceiling effect. For the NPI we found a floor effect but no ceiling effect. ConclusionOur results indicate that the Dutch version of the BPII and the NPI can be used for patients with patellar instability. Both PROMs have specific (dis)advantages.

Trochleoplasty procedures show complication rates similar to other patellar-stabilizing procedures

Purpose: Trochleoplasty aims to restore patellar stability. Various techniques have been described and almost all authors report successful results. However, the procedure has a significant risk of complications. Purpose of this study was to perform a systematic review and meta-analysis of the available literature to assess the rate of complications after the various techniques used for trochleoplasty procedures. Materials and methods: MEDLINE, EMBASE, Web of Science and Cochrane Library databases were searched. Studies on patients with recurrent patellar instability treated with a trochleoplasty with or without additional procedure, and reported complications were included. The primary outcome was the rate of complications per technique. A meta-analysis was performed whenever three or more studies per surgical technique could be included. Results: The selection process resulted in 20 studies included for analysis. A lateral facet elevating trochlear osteotomy was reported by two studies, ten studies reported on a Bereiter trochleoplasty, five on a Dejour trochleoplasty, one on an arthroscopic technique, one on a ‘modified’ technique and one on a recession wedge trochleoplasty. Meta-analysis showed that proportion of recurrent dislocation was 0.04 (95% CI 0.02–0.07) for Bereiter trochleoplasty and 0.02 (95% CI 0–0.08) for Dejour trochleoplasty. These proportions were 0.06 (95% CI 0.02–0.13) and 0.09 (95% CI 0.03–0.27) for recurrent instability, 0.07 (95% CI 0.02–0.19) and 0.12 (95% CI 0.00–0.91) for patellofemoral osteoarthritis and 0.08 (95% CI 0.04–0.14) and 0.20 (95% CI 0.11–0.32) for further surgery respectively. Conclusion: This study demonstrates that the complications after a Bereiter and Dejour trochleoplasty including additional procedures are in the range of those of other patellar stabilizing procedures. For four other techniques, no meta-analysis could be performed. The clinical relevance of this study is that it provides clinicians with the best currently available evidence on the rate of complications after trochleoplasty procedures. This can be helpful in the process of deciding whether or not to perform such a procedure, and can be used to better inform patients about the advantages and disadvantages of different trochleoplasty procedures. Level of evidence: Level IV

Complications of a self-centering sliding tibial tubercle osteotomy for patellofemoral complaints; low incidence of non-union and fracture

Item does not contain fulltex