Minimum Volume Standards: An Incentive To Perform More Radical Cystectomies?

Background: Minimum volume standards (MVS) for hospitals and/or surgeons remain a subject of debate. Opponents of MVS emphasize the possible negative effects of centralization, such as an unwanted incentive to perform surgery. Objective: To evaluate whether the introduction of MVS for radical cystectomy (RC) in the Netherlands resulted in more RCs outside guideline-recommended indications. Design, setting, and participants: All RCs performed for bladder cancer in the Netherlands between January 1, 2006 and December 31, 2017 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. During this period, two MVS were sequentially implemented for RC. RCs in intermediate-volume hospitals (hospitals that approximated the MVS) were compared with RCs in high-volume hospitals (hospitals exceeding the MVS by ≥5 RCs/yr) in a period before and a period after implementation of each of the two MVS. Outcomes measurements and statistical analysis: Descriptive analyses were performed to evaluate whether hospitals performed more RCs outside the recommended indication (cT2–4a N0 M0) and whether an increase in the number of RCs towards the end of the year could be observed. Results and limitations: After MVS implementation, no clear shift towards disease stages outside the recommended indication for RC was observed in comparison to the period before the MVS. Results for high-volume and intermediate-volume hospitals were similar. In addition, no increase in RCs towards the end of the year was evident. Conclusions: We did not find evidence indicating an unwanted incentive to perform more RCs as a result of MVS in the Netherlands. Our results further strengthen the case for MVS implementation. Patient summary: We evaluated whether criteria for the minimum number of radical cystectomies (surgical removal of the bladder) that hospitals have to perform caused urologists to perform more of these operations than necessary in order to meet the minimum level. We found no evidence that minimum criteria led to such an unwanted incentive

Low adherence to recommended use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Purpose: To evaluate guideline adherence and variation in the recommended use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the effects of this variation on survival in patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients and methods: In this nationwide, Netherlands Cancer Registry-based study, we identified 1025 patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC between November 2017 and November 2019 who underwent radical cystectomy. Patients with ECOG performance status 0–1 and creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 were considered NAC-eligible. Interhospital variation was assessed using case-mix adjusted multilevel analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between hospital specific probability of using NAC and survival. All analyses were stratified by disease stage (cT2 versus cT3-4a). Results: In total, of 809 NAC-eligible patients, only 34% (n = 277) received NAC. Guideline adherence for NAC in cT2 was 26% versus 55% in cT3-4a disease. Interhospital variation was 7–57% and 31–62%, respectively. A higher hospital specific probability of NAC might be associated with a better survival, but results were not statistically significant (HRcT2 = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.05 and HRcT3-4a = 0.71, 95% CI 0.25–2.04). Conclusion: Guideline adherence regarding NAC use is low and interhospital variation is large, especially for patients with cT2-disease. Although not significant, our data suggest that survival of patients diagnosed in hospitals more inclined to give NAC might be better. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism. As literature clearly shows the potential survival benefit of NAC in patients with cT3-4a disease, better guideline adherence might be pursued.</p

Low adherence to recommended use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer

Purpose: To evaluate guideline adherence and variation in the recommended use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and the effects of this variation on survival in patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). Patients and methods: In this nationwide, Netherlands Cancer Registry-based study, we identified 1025 patients newly diagnosed with non-metastatic MIBC between November 2017 and November 2019 who underwent radical cystectomy. Patients with ECOG performance status 0–1 and creatinine clearance ≥ 50 mL/min/1.73 m2 were considered NAC-eligible. Interhospital variation was assessed using case-mix adjusted multilevel analysis. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to evaluate the association between hospital specific probability of using NAC and survival. All analyses were stratified by disease stage (cT2 versus cT3-4a). Results: In total, of 809 NAC-eligible patients, only 34% (n = 277) received NAC. Guideline adherence for NAC in cT2 was 26% versus 55% in cT3-4a disease. Interhospital variation was 7–57% and 31–62%, respectively. A higher hospital specific probability of NAC might be associated with a better survival, but results were not statistically significant (HRcT2 = 0.59, 95% CI 0.33–1.05 and HRcT3-4a = 0.71, 95% CI 0.25–2.04). Conclusion: Guideline adherence regarding NAC use is low and interhospital variation is large, especially for patients with cT2-disease. Although not significant, our data suggest that survival of patients diagnosed in hospitals more inclined to give NAC might be better. Further research is warranted to elucidate the underlying mechanism. As literature clearly shows the potential survival benefit of NAC in patients with cT3-4a disease, better guideline adherence might be pursued.</p

Low Risk of Severe Complications After A Single, Post-Operative Instillation of Intravesical Chemotherapy in Patients with TaG1G2 Urothelial Bladder Carcinoma

Item does not contain fulltex

Non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the role of age in receiving treatment with curative intent

Objectives: To evaluate which patient and tumour characteristics are associated with remaining untreated in patients with potentially curable, non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to compare survival of untreated vs treated patients with similar characteristics. Patients and methods: For this cohort study, 15 047 patients diagnosed with cT2–T4aN0/xM0/x urothelial MIBC between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Factors associated with remaining untreated were identified using logistic regression analyses. Interhospital variation was assessed using multilevel analysis. Using a propensity score, the median overall survival (mOS) of untreated and treated patients was evaluated. Analyses were stratified by age (<75 vs ≥75 years). Results: One-third of patients aged ≥75 years remained untreated; increasing age, worse performance status, worse renal function, cT4a stage and previous radiotherapy in the abdomen/pelvic area increased the odds of remaining untreated. One in 10 patients aged <75 years remained untreated; significant associations were only found for performance status, renal function and cT4a stage. Interhospital variation for remaining untreated was largest for patients aged ≥75 years, ranging from 37% to 69% (case-mix-adjusted). Irrespective of age, mOS was significantly worse for untreated patients: 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1–7.3) vs 16.0 months (95% CI 13.5–19.1) for treated patients. Conclusion: On average, one in five patients with non-metastatic MIBC remained untreated. Untreated patients were generally older and had a more unfavourable prognostic profile. Untreated patients had significantly worse overall survival, regardless of age. Age alone should therefore not affect treatment decision-making. Considering the large interhospital variation, a proportion of untreated patients might be wrongfully denied life-prolonging treatment

Non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer: the role of age in receiving treatment with curative intent

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate which patient and tumour characteristics are associated with remaining untreated in patients with potentially curable, non-metastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC), and to compare survival of untreated vs treated patients with similar characteristics. PATIENTS AND METHODS: For this cohort study, 15 047 patients diagnosed with cT2-T4aN0/xM0/x urothelial MIBC between 2005 and 2019 were identified in the Netherlands Cancer Registry. Factors associated with remaining untreated were identified using logistic regression analyses. Interhospital variation was assessed using multilevel analysis. Using a propensity score, the median overall survival (mOS) of untreated and treated patients was evaluated. Analyses were stratified by age (&lt;75 vs ≥75 years). RESULTS: One-third of patients aged ≥75 years remained untreated; increasing age, worse performance status, worse renal function, cT4a stage and previous radiotherapy in the abdomen/pelvic area increased the odds of remaining untreated. One in 10 patients aged &lt;75 years remained untreated; significant associations were only found for performance status, renal function and cT4a stage. Interhospital variation for remaining untreated was largest for patients aged ≥75 years, ranging from 37% to 69% (case-mix-adjusted). Irrespective of age, mOS was significantly worse for untreated patients: 6.4 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 5.1-7.3) vs 16.0 months (95% CI 13.5-19.1) for treated patients. CONCLUSION: On average, one in five patients with non-metastatic MIBC remained untreated. Untreated patients were generally older and had a more unfavourable prognostic profile. Untreated patients had significantly worse overall survival, regardless of age. Age alone should therefore not affect treatment decision-making. Considering the large interhospital variation, a proportion of untreated patients might be wrongfully denied life-prolonging treatment

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bladder Cancer Care in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted regular health care with potential consequences for non-COVID diseases like cancer. To ensure continuity of oncological care, guidelines were temporarily adapted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands. METHODS: The number of bladder cancer (BC) diagnoses per month during 2020-2021 was compared to 2018-2019 based on preliminary data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Additionally, detailed data were retrieved from the NCR for the cohort diagnosed between March 1st-May 31st 2020 (first COVID wave) and 2018-2019 (reference cohort). BC diagnoses, changes in age and stage at diagnosis, and time to first-line treatment were compared between both periods. Changes in treatment were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: During the first COVID wave (week 9-22), the number of BC diagnoses decreased by 14%, corresponding with approximately 300 diagnoses, but increased again in the second half of 2020. The decline was most pronounced from week 13 onwards in patients≥70 years and patients with non-muscle invasive BC. Patients with muscle-invasive disease were less likely to undergo a radical cystectomy (RC) in week 17-22 (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.40-0.97). Shortly after the start of the outbreak, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 34% to 25% but this (non-significant) effect disappeared at the end of April. During the first wave, 5% more RCs were performed compared to previous years. Time from diagnosis to RC became 6 days shorter. Overall, a 7% reduction in RCs was observed in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The number of BC diagnoses decreased steeply by 14% during the first COVID wave but increased again to pre-COVID levels by the end of 2020 (i.e. 600 diagnoses/month). Treatment-related changes remained limited and followed the adapted guidelines. Surgical volume was not compromised during the first wave. Altogether, the impact of the first COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands appears to be less pronounced than was reported for other solid tumors, both in the Netherlands and abroad. However, its impact on bladder cancer stage shift and long-term outcomes, as well as later pandemic waves remain so far unexamined

The Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Bladder Cancer Care in the Netherlands

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has disrupted regular health care with potential consequences for non-COVID diseases like cancer. To ensure continuity of oncological care, guidelines were temporarily adapted. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the impact of the COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands. METHODS: The number of bladder cancer (BC) diagnoses per month during 2020-2021 was compared to 2018-2019 based on preliminary data from the Netherlands Cancer Registry (NCR). Additionally, detailed data were retrieved from the NCR for the cohort diagnosed between March 1st-May 31st 2020 (first COVID wave) and 2018-2019 (reference cohort). BC diagnoses, changes in age and stage at diagnosis, and time to first-line treatment were compared between both periods. Changes in treatment were evaluated using logistic regression. RESULTS: During the first COVID wave (week 9-22), the number of BC diagnoses decreased by 14%, corresponding with approximately 300 diagnoses, but increased again in the second half of 2020. The decline was most pronounced from week 13 onwards in patients≥70 years and patients with non-muscle invasive BC. Patients with muscle-invasive disease were less likely to undergo a radical cystectomy (RC) in week 17-22 (OR=0.62, 95% CI=0.40-0.97). Shortly after the start of the outbreak, use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy decreased from 34% to 25% but this (non-significant) effect disappeared at the end of April. During the first wave, 5% more RCs were performed compared to previous years. Time from diagnosis to RC became 6 days shorter. Overall, a 7% reduction in RCs was observed in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: The number of BC diagnoses decreased steeply by 14% during the first COVID wave but increased again to pre-COVID levels by the end of 2020 (i.e. 600 diagnoses/month). Treatment-related changes remained limited and followed the adapted guidelines. Surgical volume was not compromised during the first wave. Altogether, the impact of the first COVID-19 outbreak on bladder cancer care in the Netherlands appears to be less pronounced than was reported for other solid tumors, both in the Netherlands and abroad. However, its impact on bladder cancer stage shift and long-term outcomes, as well as later pandemic waves remain so far unexamined

Disease-Free Survival of Patients With Muscle-Invasive Bladder Cancer Treated With Radical Cystectomy Versus Bladder-Preserving Therapy:A Nationwide Study

Purpose: Although level I evidence is lacking that radical cystectomy (RC) is superior to bladder-preserving therapy (BPT), RC is still advocated as the recommended treatment in patients with nonmetastatic muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC). This study sought to compare the survival of patients with MIBC treated with BPT versus those treated with RC. Methods and Materials: All patients with nonmetastatic MIBC diagnoses were identified via the population-based Netherlands Cancer Registry. Only patients treated with BPT or RC were included. The primary endpoint was 2-year disease-free survival (DFS), defined as time from start of treatment until locoregional recurrence, distant metastasis, or death. The secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Inverse propensity treatment weighting (IPTW) was used based on propensity scores to adjust for baseline differences between treatment groups. Survival was analyzed with Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards models. Results: A total of 1432 patients were included, of whom 1101 underwent RC and 331, BPT. Median follow-up was 39 months (range, 27-51 months). The IPTW-adjusted 2-year DFS was 61.5% (95% CI, 53.5%-69.6%) with BPT and 55.3% (95% CI, 51.6%-59.1%) with RC, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.84 (95% CI, 0.69-1.05). The adjusted 2-year OS for patients treated with BPT versus RC was 74.0% (95% CI, 67.0%-80.9%) versus 66.0% (95% CI, 62.7%-68.8%), respectively, with an adjusted hazard ratio of 0.80 (95% CI, 0.64-0.98). Conclusions: There was no statistically significant difference between the 2-year DFS of patients treated with BPT and RC. We propose that both RC and BPT should be offered as a curative treatment option to eligible patients with nonmetastatic MIBC.</p