Neoadjuvant Treatment of Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors with [Lu-177-DOTA(0),Tyr(3)]Octreotate

Surgical oncolog

Early and Late Complications After Surgery for MEN1-related Nonfunctioning Pancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors

Objective: To estimate short and long-term morbidity after pancreatic surgery for multiple endocrine neoplasia type 1 (MEN1)-related nonfunctioning pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (NF-pNETs). Background: Fifty percent of the MEN1 patients harbor multiple NF-pNETs. The decision to proceed to NF-pNET surgery is a balance between the risk of disease progression versus the risk of surgery-related morbidity. Currently, there are insufficient data on the surgical complications after MEN1 NF-pNET surgery. Methods: MEN1 patients diagnosed with a NF-pNET who underwent surgery were selected from the DutchMEN1 study group database, including >90% of the Dutch MEN1 population. Early postoperative complications, new-onset diabetes mellitus, and exocrine pancreatic insufficiency were captured. Results: Sixty-one patients underwent NF-pNET surgery at 1 of the 8 Dutch academic centers. Patients were young (median age 41 years) with low American Society of Anesthesiologists scores. Median NF-pNET size on imaging was 22mm (3-157). Thirty-three percent (19/58) of the patients developed major early - Clavien-Dindo grade III to IV - complications mainly consisting International Study Group of Pancreatic Surgery grade B/C pancreatic fistulas. Twenty-three percent of the patients (14/61) developed endocrine or exocrine pancreas insufficiency. The development of major early postoperative complications was independent of the NF-pNET tumor size. Twenty-one percent of the patients (12/58) developed multiple major early complications. Conclusions: MEN1 NF-pNET surgery is associated with high rates of major short and long-term complications. Current findings should be taken into account in the shared decision-making process when MEN1 NF-pNET surgery is considered

Robot-assisted spleen preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients

Surgical oncolog

Robot-assisted spleen preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients

BackgroundMultiple Endocrine Neoplasia type 1 (MEN1) patients often undergo multiple pancreatic operations at a young age. ObjectiveTo describe robot-assisted and laparoscopic spleen-preserving pancreatic surgery in MEN1 patients, and to compare both techniques. MethodsRobot-assisted pancreatectomies of the DutchMEN1 study group and the Universite de Lorraine, Nancy, France were compared to a historical cohort of laparoscopic treated MEN1 patients. Perioperative outcomes were compared. ResultsA total of 21 MEN1 patients underwent minimally invasive pancreatic surgery for pancreatic neuroendocrine tumors, seven patients were subjected to robot-assisted surgery, and 14 patients underwent laparoscopic surgery. Demographics and clinical characteristics did not differ between the cohorts and no significant differences in operative outcomes were found. A high number of ISGPS grade B/C pancreatic fistulas were observed in both cohorts (38%), and no conversions were seen in the robot-assisted cohort (respectively 0% vs. 43%, P=0.06). In one laparoscopic and one robot-assisted case the primary tumor was not resected. ConclusionsMinimally invasive spleen-preserving surgery in MEN1 patients is safe and feasible. Patients who underwent robot-assisted surgery did not require conversion to open surgery. J. Surg. Oncol. 2016;114:456-461. (c) 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc

A nationwide comparison of laparoscopic and open distal pancreatectomy for benign and malignant disease.

BACKGROUND: Cohort studies from expert centers suggest that laparoscopic distal pancreatectomy (LDP) is superior to open distal pancreatectomy (ODP) regarding postoperative morbidity and length of hospital stay. But the generalizability of these findings is unknown because nationwide data on LDP are lacking. STUDY DESIGN: Adults who had undergone distal pancreatectomy in 17 centers between 2005 and 2013 were analyzed retrospectively. First, all LDPs were compared with all ODPs. Second, groups were matched using a propensity score. Third, the attitudes of pancreatic surgeons toward LDP were surveyed. The primary outcome was major complications (Clavien-Dindo grade >/=III). RESULTS: Among 633 included patients, 64 patients (10%) had undergone LDP and 569 patients (90%) had undergone ODP. Baseline characteristics were comparable, except for previous abdominal surgery and mean tumor size. In the full cohort, LDP was associated with fewer major complications (16% vs 29%; p = 0.02) and a shorter median [interquartile range, IQR] hospital stay (8 days [7-12 days] vs 10 days [8-14 days]; p = 0.03). Of all LDPs, 33% were converted to ODP. Matching succeeded for 63 LDP patients. After matching, the differences in major complications (9 patients [14%] vs 19 patients [30%]; p = 0.06) and median [IQR] length of hospital stay (8 days [7-12 days] vs 10 days [8-14 days]; p = 0.48) were not statistically significant. The survey demonstrated that 85% of surgeons welcomed LDP training. CONCLUSIONS: Despite nationwide underuse and an impact of selection bias, outcomes of LDP seemed to be at least noninferior to ODP. Specific training is welcomed and could improve both the use and outcomes of LDP